Sequels Official Spider-Man 4 Cast & Crew Discussion

[olemonica]

As long as it's not Gyllenhaal.
We have to remember he should look like Parker, not maguire.

I still think that Jonathan Bennett would be a better Peter Parker

 

[Odametal]

Jerry Seinfeld isn't funny though.

Tobey has a quieter sense of humour.

I put Seinfeld cause he was the first comediant that I remember at the time. Choose any other funny guy you want writting the jokes for Maguire, and he still will not be "Spider-Man funny".

 

[Odametal]

One idea for a villain:
Gerard Butler as Kraven.
What do you guys think?


PS: If other people already post this idea, I'm sorry.

 

[Venom 1988]

One idea for a villain:
Gerard Butler as Kraven.
What do you guys think?


PS: If other people already post this idea, I'm sorry.

Exactly!

I know he would be the perfect guy actor for Kraven. Like I've said in the past, hes a fantastic actor and could easily pull off the physique and the look of Kraven.

 

[notoriousnate87]

How about we all maintain the faith that Raimi&Co will return for a future installment instead of pondering what actors could actually replace Macguire...geez.

 

[DorkyFresh]

How about we all maintain the faith that Raimi&Co will return for a future installment instead of pondering what actors could actually replace Macguire...geez.

how about you let others do what they want to do?

 

[Eddie Brock]

How about we all maintain the faith that Raimi&Co will return for a future installment instead of pondering what actors could actually replace Macguire...geez.

Just because most people (myself included) would prefer it, doesn't mean that we shouldn't look to the future.

 

[Odametal]

How about we all maintain the faith that Raimi&Co will return for a future installment instead of pondering what actors could actually replace Macguire...geez.

Guess not... NEXT.t:

Just kiddin'

I think its time to Raimi step down and let other people show their vision of these characters.
The third movie just prove that. And if Raimi leave, the cast will too.
So lets dream( and hope) for good cast and crew.
Thats the whole point of this thread.

 

[notoriousnate87]

how about you let others do what they want to do?

I have nothing wrong with other people's opinions. I am just stating mine in relation to many others who post on the boards.

 

[notoriousnate87]

Just because most people (myself included) would prefer it, doesn't mean that we shouldn't look to the future.

Agreed. I would greatly be extremely thrilled if Raimi returned as well as Maguire and Dunst. They need a break from these film for a few years though.

 

[Odametal]

In S-M3 is more than clear thar Raimi show everything he could offer to the Spider-Man franchise. Its time for him to move on, and some other director try to bring his talent to the director's chair.
I wouldn't mind if Tobey and Kirsten leaves too.
As long as they keep the J.K Simmons, Bryce, and maybe, bring back Topher(I just hope they do this, is hard to see Venom treated like that).

 

[Eddie Brock]

bring back Topher(I just hope they do this, is hard to see Venom treated like that).

Hard to see him treated as what? As an ACTUAL human being? Is it hard to see him treated like a character with REAL depth who responds normally in a bad situation? Is it sooooo hard to watch Raimi give the character a realistic interpretation rather than "Arrrgh! I eat brains! Look at my obnoxiously long tongue! Arrgh! Green drool...EVERYWHERE!!"

 

[DorkyFresh]

my problem with the way Raimi portrayed Venom isn't that Venom's not a drooling monster who wants to tear Spider-Man limb from limb (i hate the "monster" approach to Venom) but it's just that Venom's story felt so rushed and he didn't feel very threatening to me. yes, he was, physically, a tough match for Spider-Man but that's it.

the biggest threat Venom posed, imo, is that he knew everything there is to know about Spider-Man because the symbiote stuck to Pete first. the symbiote knew all of Pete's secrets...his life, his loves, his fighting tactics, EVERYTHING...and that wasn't even hinted at in the movie. the villains in part 3 not being as fleshed out as Norman, Harry, or Otto is what made me disappointed in the portrayal of both Sandman and Venom.

 

[Eddie Brock]

the symbiote knew all of Pete's secrets...his life, his loves, his fighting tactics, EVERYTHING...and that wasn't even hinted at in the movie.

Of course it was..how else did Venom know about MJ and "Tiger"?

 

[DorkyFresh]

Of course it was..how else did Venom know about MJ and "Tiger"?

that's a mild hint and a far cry from letting the audience know that Venom knows everything about Peter...

 

[prluver]

Either Wes Craven or Steven Spielberg for the director.
The rest are hard to choose.

 

[Odametal]

Hard to see him treated as what? As an ACTUAL human being? Is it hard to see him treated like a character with REAL depth who responds normally in a bad situation? Is it sooooo hard to watch Raimi give the character a realistic interpretation rather than "Arrrgh! I eat brains! Look at my obnoxiously long tongue! Arrgh! Green drool...EVERYWHERE!!"

I agree with you, in some points.
Maybe I wasn't clear enough in my post. IMO, the character of Eddie Brock, was one of the only things that were actually good in the movie. The thing that bottered me is the fact the he was way underused. The same problem happen with Sandman(the sick daughter was not well handle)and Gwen Stacy( she is HOT, but she didn't add nothing to story).

And you have to agree with me: Venom dying after ONE bomb hit him was LAME. I hope he didn't, but since Sam Raimi continues on the director's chair, I can't be so sure.

 

[Eddie Brock]

I agree with you, in some points.
Maybe I wasn't clear enough in my post. IMO, the character of Eddie Brock, was one of the only things that were actually good in the movie. The thing that bottered me is the fact the he was way underused. The same problem happen with Sandman(the sick daughter was not well handle)and Gwen Stacy( she is HOT, but she didn't add nothing to story).

And you have to agree with me: Venom dying after ONE bomb hit him was LAME. I hope he didn't, but since Sam Raimi continues on the director's chair, I can't be so sure.

Um...symbiote are suceptible to fire, and the 1st GG used bombs that incinerated people and turned them into ash, so one bomb could EASILY defeat Venom.

 

[Maximum Carnage]

Making movies is their job. Wouldn't you want more money for your job if you could get it? Just because he makes a lot of money doesn't mean he hasd a huge ego, you're just making assumptions which are probably based on jealously, because you don't make that type of money or have the luxury of demanding more money from your current employer and getting it.

Yes, I have seen it actually. He may not be the most sarcastic person in the world and a loud mouthed wisecracker, but the writers gave him crappy dialogue in that scene.

I'm not saying he's an amazing actor, but he's a better actor than you are giving him credit for. Have you seen any of his other work? As for him not deserving twenty million dollars, you're probably right but he deserves it a lot more than a lot of other people who make that kind of cash. He's playing an iconic character and has been for three movies now and people are attached to him as Spider-man. If he wants more money that is in a reasonable price range, he should get it.

And don't apologize, just don't do it. What's the point in doing it anyway?

Who gives a crap if hes playing an iconic character?? He does not play the character very well. I believe the entire point I was making was that actors continually ask for more money (you agreed). And your saying thats not ego driven? Use common sense; the idea of saying "Ill only do this movie for this amount of dollars because I am worth it." if thats not ego then i do not know what is. You call it a "cliche" but its the truth, my friend. and yes I have seen a number of his movies as well as parts he has done on television; still not a 20 million dollar actor.

oh but wait I am just feeding cliches. bravo.

 

[Odametal]

Um...symbiote are suceptible to fire, and the 1st GG used bombs that incinerated people and turned them into ash, so one bomb could EASILY defeat Venom.

But still, it was lame.
Which brings me a question: How the hell the Goblins in these movies can tell difference between the bombs? They all look the same, and somehow, there are a lot of types: one the turn people into ashes, other that it just go BOOM(the one the scars Harry), other that you can throw in the face and it just shattered your FABRIC mask(Spider-Man 1, anyone?).

 

[DorkyFresh]

don't forget the razor pumpkins...

 

[Eddie Brock]

But still, it was lame.
Which brings me a question: How the hell the Goblins in these movies can tell difference between the bombs? They all look the same, and somehow, there are a lot of types: one the turn people into ashes, other that it just go BOOM(the one the scars Harry), other that you can throw in the face and it just shattered your FABRIC mask(Spider-Man 1, anyone?).

If you're trying to rationalize Spider-Man, you've already failed.

Need I play the "radioactive spider?" card?

 

[Spider-Fan83]

But still, it was lame.
Which brings me a question: How the hell the Goblins in these movies can tell difference between the bombs?

maybe they don't know, they just grap, throw, and sees what happens lol

 

[Odametal]

If you're trying to rationalize Spider-Man, you've already failed.

Need I play the "radioactive spider?" card?

Ok, your're right.
But you have to agree with me that a bomb basically hits the Peter's eye(or get close enough to) on Spider-Man1 in didn't leave a tiny scar on him, and a similar bomb turns Harry in Phantom Of the Opera is just dumb.

 

[jaienviedechier]

In your opinion, would Peter Jackson be interested in directing Spidey 4?