javon
Superhero
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2006
- Messages
- 6,041
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 58
Um...oh, okay.They're the same person I believe.
Um...oh, okay.They're the same person I believe.
Not completely. Cablerine doesn't have the healing factor. So rumor has it they he may be a clone of Wolverine from the sample that Sabertooth took during the end of Date Night.
The last issue just came out Wednesday, so that would be a no. It'll be a few monthsHas the Cable arc been put into TPB yet?


Next writer pleaseNext arc please![]()

You defended none of the problems we have with Kirkman, so in response to your rant...Kirkman still sucks.![]()
t:Spoons wins.t:

1. He destroyed a significant part of Wolverine/Sabretooth history by establishing Creed as Logan's son. Wolverine's arch enemy is his son? Thats silly..
2. He destroyed Cable's character. Theres no way this character can be anything but a dead ender now. No, theres no future for Cable in Ultimate Marvel.
3. His Ultimate Phoenix story is cheese extreme. The Phoenix was a cosmic entity that was locked up in a cage created by aliens and the cage eventually developed into planet Earth? Thats just garbage.
4. His dialogue and character development for the characters is blatently contrived. Its obvious hes trying way too hard to make them interesting. The discussions about the play Storm is writing and Charles revealing to Scott that hes in love with Jean are good examples of Kirkman shooting blanks.
5. The Magician arc. Nuff' said..
Yeah. Pretty much what everyone previous has said is the reason I, and most of us, are hating Kirkman's run. To make it simple? It's a lack of interesting things.
Interesting things. In Kirkman's world, this apparently means shock factor. Now, hey, shock has its uses, but in a world where shocking things happen all the time, shock factor tends to either fall short or set a constantly rising bar. But there's a difference between shock factor with bad writing behind it and shock factor with good writing behind it.
Examples (and yes, these are my own opinions): Brubaker killing Banshee in Deadly Genesis was, despite tasteless and mostly meaningless (despite it being pretty much the only thing done with Banshee in some time), shock factor with good writing behind it. Bru's a good writer, and while Deadly Genesis and his current Uncanny arc might have their flaws - well, all writing inevitably will.
Cable-Wolverine, Professor Xavier's secret lust, and Wolverine's bastard child, Earth as a cage... Those are all shock factors here and there, but they're all bad writing. Any of those, theoretically, could be done well. They could be made interesting. No, not all four at once can be made interesting. No, Magician is not interesting. Magician sucked. The other ideas could hold promise, but in Kirkman's unsteady hands, unfortunately do not. Might I also point out that, of those four, I know for certain that at least two of them suffered from the "shock ending" syndrome. This is the idea in writing that you start a chapter with a shock or end a chapter with a shock - and while this is a good technique when used sparingly, when used constantly it becomes a constant and boring feature. I just don't remember where in their issues Sabretooth and Lilandra let the figurative cats out of their bags.
We might all think anyone who likes Kirkman on this book is messed up, but hey, it's your opinion. I just don't know how in the world you can come to have it.t:
As for Vaughan's run being bad... Wow. I don't know, just off the top of my head, I can think of three hugely interesting things he did - introducing Ultimate Longshot, which was done infinitely better than the introduction of Ultimate Cable (it's almost like comparing a pristine apple to a rotton one), introducing and expanding upon Emma's school and the characters there (Havok, Polaris, Cannonball, Northstar, Sunspot, Doug Ramsey) which was similarly handled much better than Ultimate Cable or Magician or Date Night, and the ending arc... What was it, Magnetic North? This arc was a huge grand finale, and set a great landmark for the title. ... Which is why I hope Kirkman doesn't touch it with a thirty foot pole.
Oh boy:
1. COLOSSUS! Remember the guy who beat up Thor and IronMan in Ultimate War? Yeah, I do. He's the same guy getting tossed around by the Blob and detained by freaking Multiple man. Write the damn character better and stronger.
2. His Jean Grey makes me sick. She's not as crazy as she is emo and annoying. I can dig the goblins but c'mon.
3. The way the Magician arc ended was ridiculous. He had the same powers as Proteus(pretty much) and the Proteus arc was much more entertaining and it ended waay better.
4. Charles in love with JeanI know it's an old 616 conecept but I could have lived without seeing this Ultimized.
5. He's totally killed the Iceman character for me. Bobby hasn't done anything badass or even memorable since Kirkman got behind the reigns. Same goes for Storm really.
Kirkman is rockin my socks off in Ant-Man. I don't know what other books he writes off the top of my head but you'd think Kirkman wrote Ant-Man first thing in the morning after a nutritious breakfast and after a night of clubbing and drug abuse, he comes home and writes UXM.
Next arc please![]()
Next writer please
Horhey said:1. He destroyed a significant part of Wolverine/Sabretooth history by establishing Creed as Logan's son. Wolverine's arch enemy is his son? Thats silly..
Do we know what the next arc will be called or what it's going to be about?Next arc please![]()
Does Bryan Singer still want to co-write 12 issues with Brian K. Vaughan?Next writer please
The next one is a two-issues one and it's called "Aftermath", dealing with the events in "Cable", the next is "Cliffhanger" (1 issue) and then we'll have "All Different" (I don't know how many issues), when we'll see a new ultimized character.Do we know what the next arc will be called or what it's going to be about?
Does Bryan Singer still want to co-write 12 issues with Brian K. Vaughan?
When was this said?