if kraven IS in the movie then there HAS to be superhuman villian as well, even 'kraven's last hunt' had vermin (man/rat).
Why did he have nothing involving his daughter at the end. That just seemed weird to me.
Also what's weird is Sandman not being in Spider-man 4 because alot of people will wonder what happened to him.
Very true. I guess we'll just have to wait and see, and I'm quite excited about this, even though something tells me it isn't true.True.
And may I remember that we got a plot summary and a Q&A more than a year in advance of S-M3 here on these boards?![]()
True.
And may I remember that we got a plot summary and a Q&A more than a year in advance of S-M3 here on these boards?![]()
Yeah, I was thinking that Kraven made sense given that Raimi was going for a 'back to basics' approach after the super villan melee of SM3.
If you have one human type villan you can then concentrate most of the budget and sfx work on the Lizard.
The person on aicn said Kraven was one of the villans, if he was pulling a fast one I would have thought he would have bs'd the other villan too.
But maybe he only came by news on the one villan as there was talk round the campfire of who'd been offered a role in SM4, The Lizard role already being cast.
His info on Avengers also seemed plausible, as in, the bare facts he had seemed like a sketch of where they are going with it, and not some elaborate thing someone would make up to get attention.
Yeah, could all be bs, but it's another name to talk about anyway.
btw he said the villans in Avengers would beThe Skrulls
if kraven IS in the movie then there HAS to be superhuman villian as well, even 'kraven's last hunt' had vermin (man/rat).
I say this guy is BS. That sounds like a terribly cheezy, unimaginative plot for Avengers IMO. If Clive Owen isn't announced before the year we know it's BS.
I just can't accept Skrulls for movie one. It just completely throws away the credibility Favreau established, which is why he is probably worried **** about the movie. Depends on what they do with Thor, but I don't see Branagh getting all alien on us either. I am bias so that's why I think the rumor is BS, but that's how I feel about it.

I just can't accept Skrulls for movie one. It just completely throws away the credibility Favreau established, which is why he is probably worried **** about the movie. Depends on what they do with Thor, but I don't see Branagh getting all alien on us either. I am bias so that's why I think the rumor is BS, but that's how I feel about it.
Is Joe Johnston freaking out because there's no way a super soldier can interact with a god/immortal in a superhero fantasy movie?I just can't accept Skrulls for movie one. It just completely throws away the credibility Favreau established, which is why he is probably worried **** about the movie. Depends on what they do with Thor, but I don't see Branagh getting all alien on us either. I am bias so that's why I think the rumor is BS, but that's how I feel about it.
Favreau isn't running the show, Marvel is. It's their baby.Clive Owen is not the right choice for Kraven.
The thing is though, even if they DO use Kraven, are they gonna adapt the Kraven's Last Hunt storyline or would it be a typical supervillain plot? I mean Kraven's Last Hunt was pretty much the only memorable Kraven storyline but i'm thinkking it may be a bit too dark for a Spider-man movie that kids will be watching. But i, personally would love to see that adapted. I mean after already using Green Goblin, Doc Ock and Venom, they need to find a way to make Kraven a much more formidable villain than any of the aforementioned ones.
Wikpedia too says that Clive is going to portray Kraven!
Of course it's a highly unreliable source..
however do we have any official announcements yet I haven't heard of??
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clive_Owen
Wikipedia says it's rumoured

I see
it could be a sign that it's true though..