Comics Oh, Come On!!!!

Donald Thomas said:
ALoha,
I'm loving this conversation. One thing that we should all be aware of is that AS long as Sidey is wearing that Iron SPidey costume-NONE of the laws of Spidey necessairly apply. Do you think that Tony Stark would ever make a costume that he couldn't control?I'm upset that Peter still puts it on. I was hoping that The Other would at least explore the range of Spidey's new powers. Not only hasn't that happened, we still don't know the full scope of the Iron Spidey costume.IT'S BUGGED people. Tony Stark knows when Peter pisses,makes love and belches. As far as Spidey lifting 15 tons and being a Wimp. How do you explain Kingpin being able to physically challege Spidey for the past several decades.?In my opinion, the fuil range of Spidey's powers have never been explored by Marvel. It should take ONE PUNCH from Spidey to defeat ANY normal crook. This crap about holding back his pucnhes is just that. As far as SPidey being beat by C class villians in Civil War-between the costume and the total confusion in Peter's head right now-anything is possible. Although he has been around for a long time-Spidey really needs a super hero mentor-Tony Stark AIN'T It, although at one point Peter thought he could be.
Spidey rules


All what-ifs... they've NEVER even hinted that Stark can monitor and/or control Pete with that costume. And, on page, that's all that counts. Ya, the suits probably bugged, but until they say it is... it isn't. And, sorry to say, but Spider-Man is a ****ing MORON if he hasn't even considered that possibility. If he had, he'd have torn that suit off way before he switched sides.

I'm just not gonna rationalize all this crappy Spidey writing based off of the "suit". That's just lazy. :down:
 
USMC said:
I'm just not gonna rationalize all this crappy Spidey writing based off of the "suit". That's just lazy. :down:

Pretty much how I feel about ALL the people who rationalize ANY of this Civil War crap.

Eat another spoonful of crap kids! Mmmmmmmm! Yummy!
 
Firstly - HoratioRome - do me a favor and stop referring to people who are looking at this differently as "fans" (ie in quotation marks). Whether or not they think - as you claimed - that Ant-Man can beat Spider-Man doesn't make them ANY less Spider-Man fans. Suggesting that they're NOT fans by doing the whole quotation thing is an insult. People who like "Sins Past" aren't any less Spider-Man fans for liking it - they're just fans of ****ty writing. So, do us a favor and quit, m'kay?

IMO, I disagree with the whole "Spidey gets taken down by a couple of C-Listers" AT ALL, I can certainly UNDERSTAND why they're doing it. This is Spider-Man's fall from grace. Putting his family in danger, fighting against someone he considered a friend, and then getting taken down by foes he could wipe the floor with on a normal day - this is his lowest moment (at least in recent history). I see where they're going with this, even if the execution is terribly off...
 
I'll still wait to see ASM # 536 myself before I pass a final judgement. Just because he didn't face the new Thunderbolts, Goblin, Venom, etc...doesn't mean that he didn't go through other types of roadblocks that WEREN'T the Thunderbolts.

I'm just kind of having a lot of fun with this thread because there are some people who seem to ACTUALLY be in deep rooted love with Spider-Man. I mean he's my favorite comic book character and everything but just because a couple of lower level villains lay a smack down on him doesn't mean that he's a "wimp". Haha. Sheesh. And nobody is overreacting, huh? :oldrazz:
 
Lt. Figgnuts said:
Firstly - HoratioRome - do me a favor and stop referring to people who are looking at this differently as "fans" (ie in quotation marks). Whether or not they think - as you claimed - that Ant-Man can beat Spider-Man doesn't make them ANY less Spider-Man fans. Suggesting that they're NOT fans by doing the whole quotation thing is an insult. People who like "Sins Past" aren't any less Spider-Man fans for liking it - they're just fans of ****ty writing. So, do us a favor and quit, m'kay?

IMO, I disagree with the whole "Spidey gets taken down by a couple of C-Listers" AT ALL, I can certainly UNDERSTAND why they're doing it. This is Spider-Man's fall from grace. Putting his family in danger, fighting against someone he considered a friend, and then getting taken down by foes he could wipe the floor with on a normal day - this is his lowest moment (at least in recent history). I see where they're going with this, even if the execution is terribly off...

I'm sorry but I think it is perfectly legitimate of me to put fans in quotation mark when referring to some people. As you know,the word fan is short for "fanatic" which is defined as irrational enthusiasm. We can further deduce from the word that "fans" have an unrelenting support, love, and uncompromising attachement to the object of their desire.
They root for the object of their desire often irrationally, not against it.

So when someone actually argues against said object, particularly when they are in fact ignoring the positives and focusing on the negatives. When their reasoning puts down and demeans said object, it is perfectly reasonable for me to question their "fanaticism".

I do and will continue to question a "fan" who thinks that Spider-man can be defeated by the likes of Ant man, Captain America, Wolverine or most of the MU. given SM's powers, skills, weapons, unrelenting spirit, experience, and the fact that he's already faced and defeated most of the MU.


People who like "sins past" may not be any less of a fan than I am because that's a matter of choice and taste in story telling and direction, but people who root for SM to be beat, who say things like "it's about time he got taken down a few notches", who argue for him to lose against much weaker opponents, who ignore all his accomplishements and focus only on the failures which are most often attributed to bad writing, who rationalize and make excuses for the unfair and innaccurate treatment of SM, who clearly either don't know or don't understand the character's powers and abilities, who either don't know the character's past and the overwhelmingly powerful foes he's faced and beaten in the past, who assume the worst rather than the best, and so on and so on,, those people's "fanaticism" must be in question.

I've said this before, imagine a sports "fan" doing the same for his team. How quickly would he be dismissed as faker. he might even get his ass kicked in the wring crowd.

sorry if that bugs you but I am withing my rights.
 
USMC said:
All what-ifs... they've NEVER even hinted that Stark can monitor and/or control Pete with that costume. And, on page, that's all that counts. Ya, the suits probably bugged, but until they say it is... it isn't. And, sorry to say, but Spider-Man is a ****ing MORON if he hasn't even considered that possibility. If he had, he'd have torn that suit off way before he switched sides.

I'm just not gonna rationalize all this crappy Spidey writing based off of the "suit". That's just lazy. :down:

Aloha,
#528-end of comic Stark listens in to see if it's the real Peter.
#529 MJ asks Tony if the bird can see as well as talk and Tony says" it can only talk and then says"Nice tan by the way" just as a joke. Okay-so the man who can remote control ALL of his Iron Man suits forgets to install the same technology into the Iron Spidey suit. Peter dosen't own that suit Stark does.Do they have to spell out every detail of a character who by his nature keeps tabs on everything within his domain?I noticed that you never responded to the Kingpin being able to go toe to toe with Spidey. Thats been happening for decades and is totally out of the question since Kingpin is a normal human being.The idea of Spidey pulling his punches to fight normal guys is also out of wack. You pull your punches so you don't KILL normal people, but that still means ONE punch and ALL normal crooks are out for the count.Over the years there has been many contradictions regarding the powers of Spider-Man.I don't think that Ant Man can beat Spidey, but I do know that ANY champ can lose on any given day.And champion athletes have lost to third rate players.For the record, while we all have the right to our opinions regarding any particular story arc-Civil War is a financial success in the comic book market this year. In the face of that success it makes some internet fans a joke in the eyes of the comic book industry.
Spidey rules
 
Donald Thomas said:
Aloha,
#528-end of comic Stark listens in to see if it's the real Peter.
#529 MJ asks Tony if the bird can see as well as talk and Tony says" it can only talk and then says"Nice tan by the way" just as a joke. Okay-so the man who can remote control ALL of his Iron Man suits forgets to install the same technology into the Iron Spidey suit. Peter dosen't own that suit Stark does.Do they have to spell out every detail of a character who by his nature keeps tabs on everything within his domain?

If that were the case, then by Spider-Man's own nature, he would have never have done the things he's done and/or he still would have known the suit was bugged from the very beginning, but he acts as if he has no clue. So, as readers, we're expected to just "know" that Stark, by his very nature, should act in a specific way in regards to his toys, but swallow the ridiculous things that Peter has or hasn't done that does not jive with his own very nature? What's good for one character isn't good for the other?

I noticed that you never responded to the Kingpin being able to go toe to toe with Spidey.

I don't know that I ever got into any discussion over the fight? Maybe that was intended for someone else?:huh: I said I'll reserve judgement about the fight after reading ASM...

Thats been happening for decades and is totally out of the question since Kingpin is a normal human being.The idea of Spidey pulling his punches to fight normal guys is also out of wack. You pull your punches so you don't KILL normal people, but that still means ONE punch and ALL normal crooks are out for the count.Over the years there has been many contradictions regarding the powers of Spider-Man.I don't think that Ant Man can beat Spidey, but I do know that ANY champ can lose on any given day.And champion athletes have lost to third rate players.

I concur. Spidey losing a fight doesn't bother me that much, so long as it's written well... I know Spidey is the best hero in the MU, I don't need to see him written like he's Wolverine to prove that.

For the record, while we all have the right to our opinions regarding any particular story arc-Civil War is a financial success in the comic book market this year. In the face of that success it makes some internet fans a joke in the eyes of the comic book industry.
Spidey rules

:D That's a fact.
 
You kno, i have one question, was IronMan always this manipulative Batman-esque character? I've never followed the IronMan comics so i dont know, if someone can answer that for me i'd be grateful. And if he was always this way, then im real surprised this civil war between him and cap hasn't happened sooner.
 
If that were the case, then by Spider-Man's own nature, he would have never have done the things he's done and/or he still would have known the suit was bugged from the very beginning, but he acts as if he has no clue. So, as readers, we're expected to just "know" that Stark, by his very nature, should act in a specific way in regards to his toys, but swallow the ridiculous things that Peter has or hasn't done that does not jive with his own very nature? What's good for one character isn't good for the other?

Aloha,
This is where the editing or lack thereof comes into play.First the one shot-Spider-Man Black and Blue and Read all over-attempts to explain why Peter would do such a STUPID thing like reveal his secret identity.Men do dumb things sometimes to please the women in their lives. Aunt May and MJ sincerely wanted Peter to receive the credit for all of the good things he's done over the years.Then in Amazing #529, he goes to Aunt May and MJ regarding the whole registration act to get their seal of approval.They say -go for it.The one thing that I have realized in the reading of Spider-Man novels is that the MASK of Spider-Man is looked upon as a MAJOR factor in people not trusting him and fearing him.If you will, that was the reason for him taking off that mask. Since he was going legit, he wanted to come out in the open completely. Now in hindsight, it was still the DUMBEST THING SPIDER-MAN HAS EVER DONE! But, if you had a billionaire courting you for your assistance,setting up your loved ones in the lap of luxury AND you were the original hard luck guy- you might take a stab at what you imagine should be the good life for you and your family. Just a thought!
Spidey rules
 
This discussion is so ridiculous I can't even believe it's going on.

Are we really saying people aren't "fans" because they're not fanatics? I mean, c'mon, I love the face painters and screamers at games, they up the entertainment level and all, but I hope to God that I'm not ever one of them. Because it's just lame. I've got way better things to do with my time and life. Doesn't make me any less of a Steelers/Penguins/Pirates fan.

There also seems to be this move to quantify Spidey's powers to justify/shoot down a plot point. Give me a break. Spidey went toe-to-toe with Firelord once. Firelord. Cosmic Power vs a strong guy who can jump around a lot. If this was the "real world" (an invocation that I hate that people around here seem to love), and these "powers" existed, that fight would have lasted long enough for Firelord to flash-fry our favorite hero. Now, that was one of the most memorable Spidey fights, and I always include it in lists of best spidey battles. And I'm more than willing to overlook an obvious mismatch in order to give me such an entertaining story. Is Spidey versus these two losers a mismatch? Of course it is. Is Spidey versus these two losers a mismatch after Spidey has gone at it with Iron Man and been shot through a window? Maybe it still is, but it's not quite as clear now. Throw in the fact that there may have been more fighting and villains off-panel (which I think is perfectly appropriate for a mini like this which is only supposed to be the jumping off point to other titles, I mean, why do you think they do these things?), than it's perfectly plausible. Throw in the NFL axiom, "on any given sunday", and hey, someone like the Jester could get the drop on a beat-up, distracted Spidey.
 
iloveclones said:
This discussion is so ridiculous I can't even believe it's going on.

Are we really saying people aren't "fans" because they're not fanatics? I mean, c'mon, I love the face painters and screamers at games, they up the entertainment level and all, but I hope to God that I'm not ever one of them. Because it's just lame. I've got way better things to do with my time and life. Doesn't make me any less of a Steelers/Penguins/Pirates fan.

There also seems to be this move to quantify Spidey's powers to justify/shoot down a plot point. Give me a break. Spidey went toe-to-toe with Firelord once. Firelord. Cosmic Power vs a strong guy who can jump around a lot. If this was the "real world" (an invocation that I hate that people around here seem to love), and these "powers" existed, that fight would have lasted long enough for Firelord to flash-fry our favorite hero. Now, that was one of the most memorable Spidey fights, and I always include it in lists of best spidey battles. And I'm more than willing to overlook an obvious mismatch in order to give me such an entertaining story. Is Spidey versus these two losers a mismatch? Of course it is. Is Spidey versus these two losers a mismatch after Spidey has gone at it with Iron Man and been shot through a window? Maybe it still is, but it's not quite as clear now. Throw in the fact that there may have been more fighting and villains off-panel (which I think is perfectly appropriate for a mini like this which is only supposed to be the jumping off point to other titles, I mean, why do you think they do these things?), than it's perfectly plausible. Throw in the NFL axiom, "on any given sunday", and hey, someone like the Jester could get the drop on a beat-up, distracted Spidey.

I hate to tell you this, but if you read the THREAD it has already been establish that there is NO SUCH battle in Amazing Spiderman 536. Hence forth the outrage that people are expressing in these boards. Next thing you know they'll have a D-List character like Jiggsaw breaking Spider-man arm... OPPS
 
I did read the thread. 50 posts repeating the same thing in a different way.

Outrage? Really?
 
iloveclones said:
This discussion is so ridiculous I can't even believe it's going on.

Are we really saying people aren't "fans" because they're not fanatics?
Now I just have to laugh about this. Please do yourself a favor and read that again. You might see the same absurdity that I see in the question. Duhh, of course we're saying people aren't fans because they're not fanatics:woot: :woot: that's the point. It's like asking, "are you saying people aren't basketball players because they don't play basketball? People aren't tall because they're short? people aren't black because they're white? "etc. That's just too funny. There are plenty of people who like something, who may even follow it to a certain extent, they may even like it very much, but aren't "fans". The word fan is specific and like every other word has a meaning. So no, people who aren't fanatics aren't fans.
I mean, c'mon, I love the face painters and screamers at games, they up the entertainment level and all, but I hope to God that I'm not ever one of them. Because it's just lame. I've got way better things to do with my time and life. Doesn't make me any less of a Steelers/Penguins/Pirates fan.

of course that doesn't make you less of a fan. that's not what we're talking about. to be a fan doesn't mean you are a clown or you have to act like one. There are all kinds of "fans". Some are very quiet fans, and some are very loud. What makes a him a fan is what's in his heart. the degree to which he loves, supports, follows, etc. a subject.
I like football, I used to be a Bills fan (when they went to the SB 4 times in a row) but I've since moved to another area and the bills suck. guess what? I'm no longer a Bills fan I (if I ever was). I follow footballs, there are a lot of teams I like and root for, but I'm not yet a "fan" of any of those teams. There is a difference. Heck, I love Superman, but I'm not a Superman "fan".
There also seems to be this move to quantify Spidey's powers to justify/shoot down a plot point. Give me a break. Spidey went toe-to-toe with Firelord once. Firelord. Cosmic Power vs a strong guy who can jump around a lot. If this was the "real world" (an invocation that I hate that people around here seem to love), and these "powers" existed, that fight would have lasted long enough for Firelord to flash-fry our favorite hero. Now, that was one of the most memorable Spidey fights, and I always include it in lists of best spidey battles. And I'm more than willing to overlook an obvious mismatch in order to give me such an entertaining story. Is Spidey versus these two losers a mismatch? Of course it is. Is Spidey versus these two losers a mismatch after Spidey has gone at it with Iron Man and been shot through a window? Maybe it still is, but it's not quite as clear now. Throw in the fact that there may have been more fighting and villains off-panel (which I think is perfectly appropriate for a mini like this which is only supposed to be the jumping off point to other titles, I mean, why do you think they do these things?), than it's perfectly plausible. Throw in the NFL axiom, "on any given sunday", and hey, someone like the Jester could get the drop on a beat-up, distracted Spidey.

this is yet again a perfect example of the misconception of who and what Spider-man is. Look, Spider-man is no light weight. he has never been. He was never supposed to be. Very early on, Stan Lee established that SM could hold his own against people like the Thing, the Submariner, Rhino, and a host of other really powerfull people.
As for the fight against Firelord, again this is a case of a "fan" looking at things to the detrement of the character rather than to his advantage.
Firelord IS stronger and much more powerfull than SM. But he is NOT stronger than the foes that SM has faced in the past. He only lifts 50 tons. As for his cosmic power, it is only powerful if it hits its target. Guess what? SM has ALWAYS had the speed and agility to avoid shots taken at him yes even from the likes of Firelord.

Besides, and this is VERY important, THAT story was handled VERY well, because it did not show SM treating FL as an equal. It did not have SM going toe to toe with FL, exchanging blow for blow. It did not have SM absorbing FL's blast as if they couldn hurt him. It did not treat Sm like he was Thor.

What it did was understand that there was a HUGE descrepency between their power lever, and it respected that. TIt understood that FL is much more powerful than SM. Therefore SM had to deal with this mismatch in order to win. how? by utilizing SM's abilities to their fullest.
*They first had SM acknowledge Firelord was much more powerful than he.
*Then they made it clear that SM could not handle a hit from FL by having him running and avoiding getting hit by any means necessary (which given his speed and experience is perfectly reasonable),
*Then they had SM use other things besides his own power to soften up FL (like an exploding gas station and a falling building),
*Then they had SM take him down with a barrage of punches rather than a single punch. which given SM's strength is also reasonable

That is perfectly fine story telling. A great way to demonstrate SM's abilities, resourcefullness, courage and greatness as a hero.

THAT is NOT what they are currently doing. remember, please, I'm begging you, remember that SM is 25 times stronger actually more than than cause SM now lifts 15 tons and 15 times faster than Cap, but Firelord is only 5 times stronger than SM.
Yet when SM faced Cap, he was the one saying how unbelievable Cap is and how HE couldn't deal with Cap. they made it that Spider-man had to go to his bag of tricks in order to cope with Cap, Not the other way around.
I'm telling you that makes no sense. And No "fan" should accept that.

I promise you, if ANY writer ever writes a SM vs Firelord story, and in the book they have Firelord talking about how powerfull SM is, and how he can't keep up with him, how much more powerfull SM is, and how he has to go to other sources just to survive against him, I will be on here saying that is terrible writing.

It's unbelievable. I guess Marvel has done such a good job of lessenning this character that even the "fans" don't know anything about him.

One last point, I will agree that Marvel is responsible for this misconception. there were too many instances in the past where SM struggled against human level people. Someone brought up the Kingpin, and they are right. But trust me on this, I've studied SM comics very carefully and for a long time. and I can tell you all is not what it seems.
The historical fact is that Marvel established SM as a person who holds back tremendously when he faces human foes. yes too much, yes it makes very little sense, yes it is often a technical mistake, and yes it makes him look much weaker than he actually is, but that is what they did. Spiderman holds back. Superman suffered from the same problem. Yes SM struggled against the likes of the Kingpin, but when you read the stories carefully you find that
A) SM often had some handicap which reduced his power
B)SM was never hurt or in any real danger in those fights. even when it seemed like he was. Read the stories carefully and you will find that most often he was playing possom, or a tricking those characters.
C) when and if SM did get hurt it would be because of some other factor, like an explosion, or getting hit from behind, rather than the power of his foe.
D) if SM ever had to he could and did stop those fights with one punch (the latest example of this I read was in ASM 271 where he fought the manslaughter. A human but very strong guy. IN the beginning the guy slams Spidey against a wall with a punch then forces SM to duck and get out of his way. BUT, when he hurts a bistander, SM gets mad and tells him to take his best shot. the guy swings at Spidey and Spidey catches the punch in his hand as if it was nothing. then SM just knocks him out with one punch.

When you read SM comics carefully you find plenty of examples like that, where SM stops seemingly tough fights with a single punch.

I'm begging you, go back, re-read those comics and see for yourself. (read ASM, the other books were not as consistent)


For some reason however all "fans" could remember are the times when he struggles against the likes of the prowler, but forget the many times where he's knocked out the likes of Mr.Hyde, Rhino, Forelord, etc etc,.

what a shame
 
AmazingSpider-Man271_small.jpg
This book.
 
Well, i'm a fan of Spider-man, and I really don't care if he Loses a fight or not. If i bring drama, which it does, then it's fine by me. As long as it's interesting, which it is to me, then i'll read.
 
HR, I have to make this clear. I have zero interest in how much any of these characters can and cannot lift. From Hulk down to Humbug. I think when you start to quantify these things, it sucks all the living fun out of it. It's why I don't go to vs. threads.

I've been reading Spidey since the mid-70s. I'm very comfortable with my knowledge of the character and my status as a fan. Not a fanatic (if you want to play semantics.) But a simple fan. One who has invested thousands upon thousands of dollars, and many more hours in this hobby. And to have someone imply that I'm not a fan because I don't find it to be the end of all existance that the Jester got the drop on Spidey, or that I don't go around screaming that Marvel is spitting/pissing/crapping/insert-favorite-bodily-fluid-here all over my favorite character, frankly, is mildly insulting. Because I don't believe it.
 
iloveclones said:
HR, I have to make this clear. I have zero interest in how much any of these characters can and cannot lift. From Hulk down to Humbug. I think when you start to quantify these things, it sucks all the living fun out of it. It's why I don't go to vs. threads.

I've been reading Spidey since the mid-70s. I'm very comfortable with my knowledge of the character and my status as a fan. Not a fanatic (if you want to play semantics.) But a simple fan. One who has invested thousands upon thousands of dollars, and many more hours in this hobby. And to have someone imply that I'm not a fan because I don't find it to be the end of all existance that the Jester got the drop on Spidey, or that I don't go around screaming that Marvel is spitting/pissing/crapping/insert-favorite-bodily-fluid-here all over my favorite character, frankly, is mildly insulting. Because I don't believe it.

man, you're totally missing the point.
 
maybe some reading comprehension classes may help:woot:

here's some help. let me point out some of the "points"
of course that doesn't make you less of a fan. that's not what we're talking about. to be a fan doesn't mean you are a clown or you have to act like one. There are all kinds of "fans". Some are very quiet fans, and some are very loud. What makes a him a fan is what's in his heart. the degree to which he loves, supports, follows, etc. a subject.
I like football, I used to be a Bills fan (when they went to the SB 4 times in a row) but I've since moved to another area and the bills suck. guess what? I'm no longer a Bills fan I (if I ever was). I follow footballs, there are a lot of teams I like and root for, but I'm not yet a "fan" of any of those teams. There is a difference. Heck, I love Superman, but I'm not a Superman "fan".

this is yet again a perfect example of the misconception of who and what Spider-man is. Look, Spider-man is no light weight. he has never been. He was never supposed to be. Very early on, Stan Lee established that SM could hold his own against people like the Thing, the Submariner, Rhino, and a host of other really powerfull people.
As for the fight against Firelord, again this is a case of a "fan" looking at things to the detrement of the character rather than to his advantage.
Firelord IS stronger and much more powerfull than SM. But he is NOT stronger than the foes that SM has faced in the past. He only lifts 50 tons. As for his cosmic power, it is only powerful if it hits its target. Guess what? SM has ALWAYS had the speed and agility to avoid shots taken at him yes even from the likes of Firelord.

Besides, and this is VERY important, THAT story was handled VERY well, because it did not show SM treating FL as an equal. It did not have SM going toe to toe with FL, exchanging blow for blow. It did not have SM absorbing FL's blast as if they couldn hurt him. It did not treat SM like he was Thor.

What it did was understand that there was a HUGE descrepency between their power level, and it respected that. TIt understood that FL is much more powerful than SM. Therefore SM had to deal with this mismatch in order to win. how? by utilizing SM's abilities to their fullest.
*They first had SM acknowledge Firelord was much more powerful than he.
*Then they made it clear that SM could not handle a hit from FL by having him running and avoiding getting hit by any means necessary (which given his speed and experience is perfectly reasonable),
*Then they had SM use other things besides his own power to soften up FL (like an exploding gas station and a falling building),
*Then they had SM take him down with a barrage of punches rather than a single punch. which given SM's strength is also reasonable

That is perfectly fine story telling. A great way to demonstrate SM's abilities, resourcefullness, courage and greatness as a hero.

THAT is NOT what they are currently doing. remember, please, I'm begging you, remember that SM is 25 times stronger actually more than than cause SM now lifts 15 tons and 15 times faster than Cap, but Firelord is only 5 times stronger than SM.
Yet when SM faced Cap, he was the one saying how unbelievable Cap is and how HE couldn't deal with Cap. they made it that Spider-man had to go to his bag of tricks in order to cope with Cap, Not the other way around.
I'm telling you that makes no sense. And No "fan" should accept that.

I promise you, if ANY writer ever writes a SM vs Firelord story, and in the book they have Firelord talking about how powerfull SM is, and how he can't keep up with him, how much more powerfull SM is, and how he has to go to other sources just to survive against him, I will be on here saying that is terrible writing.

It's unbelievable. I guess Marvel has done such a good job of lessenning this character that even the "fans" don't know anything about him.

One last point, I will agree that Marvel is responsible for this misconception. there were too many instances in the past where SM struggled against human level people. Someone brought up the Kingpin, and they are right. But trust me on this, I've studied SM comics very carefully and for a long time. and I can tell you all is not what it seems.
The historical fact is that Marvel established SM as a person who holds back tremendously when he faces human foes. yes too much, yes it makes very little sense, yes it is often a technical mistake, and yes it makes him look much weaker than he actually is, but that is what they did. Spiderman holds back. Superman suffered from the same problem. Yes SM struggled against the likes of the Kingpin, but when you read the stories carefully you find that A) SM often had some handicap which reduced his power
B)SM was never hurt or in any real danger in those fights. even when it seemed like he was. Read the stories carefully and you will find that most often he was playing possom, or a tricking those characters.
C) when and if SM did get hurt it would be because of some other factor, like an explosion, or getting hit from behind, rather than the power of his foe.
D) if SM ever had to he could and did stop those fights with one punch (the latest example of this I read was in ASM 271 where he fought the manslaughter. A human but very strong guy. IN the beginning the guy slams Spidey against a wall with a punch then forces SM to duck and get out of his way. BUT, when he hurts a bistander, SM gets mad and tells him to take his best shot. the guy swings at Spidey and Spidey catches the punch in his hand as if it was nothing. then SM just knocks him out with one punch.

When you read SM comics carefully you find plenty of examples like that, where SM stops seemingly tough fights with a single punch.

I'm begging you, go back, re-read those comics and see for yourself. (read ASM, the other books were not as consistent)


For some reason however all "fans" could remember are the times when he struggles against the likes of the prowler, but forget the many times where he's knocked out the likes of Mr.Hyde, Rhino, Forelord, etc etc,.

better?
 
iloveclones said:
You're right, because I've yet to see one.

The point is, that while for some here it's enough to read anything Marvel puts out, some of us demand more. If a character is established to be a certain way; If that character's popularity it based upon these ideas, then there are those of us who want to see these qualities all the time. There's also such a thing as evolution of character. As you do a given action, it becomes increasingly easy for you. Peter has been doing what he does for a very long time. He should get better at it, not worse.

While for you and others any action, any scenario is acceptable, for myself, I get taken out of a story if what I'm seeing isn't convincing. Peter has a spider sense. It's supposed to warn him of danger. He has superhuman reflexes, strength, speed. On his worse day, he's still many times superior to the likes of The Jester on his BEST DAY. He has combat smarts that soeone like the Jester can't possibly have. You can talk abou any given Sunday all you want. You're not taking down a tank with a firecracker.

And another thing. As for CW#5, I just flipped through it. There's nothing to indicate that Spidey fought anyone else. The damage to his suit appears to be from nothing other than the barrage of shots that sent him through the window, and the resulting fall. I also checked out ASM #536, and without giving away any spoilers, it and CW #5 don't even remotely match up. They're like two completely different stories. Now, that may be peachy keen for some of you. It's not enough for the rest of us.
 
Dragon said:
And another thing. As for CW#5, I just flipped through it. There's nothing to indicate that Spidey fought anyone else. The damage to his suit appears to be from nothing other than the barrage of shots that sent him through the window, and the resulting fall. I also checked out ASM #536, and without giving away any spoilers, it and CW #5 don't even remotely match up. They're like two completely different stories. Now, that may be peachy keen for some of you. It's not enough for the rest of us.

Aloha,
Again an issue of editing or lack thereof.
Spidey rules
 
Dragon said:
The point is, that while for some here it's enough to read anything Marvel puts out, some of us demand more. If a character is established to be a certain way; If that character's popularity it based upon these ideas, then there are those of us who want to see these qualities all the time. There's also such a thing as evolution of character. As you do a given action, it becomes increasingly easy for you. Peter has been doing what he does for a very long time. He should get better at it, not worse.

While for you and others any action, any scenario is acceptable, for myself, I get taken out of a story if what I'm seeing isn't convincing. Peter has a spider sense. It's supposed to warn him of danger. He has superhuman reflexes, strength, speed. On his worse day, he's still many times superior to the likes of The Jester on his BEST DAY. He has combat smarts that soeone like the Jester can't possibly have. You can talk abou any given Sunday all you want. You're not taking down a tank with a firecracker.

And another thing. As for CW#5, I just flipped through it. There's nothing to indicate that Spidey fought anyone else. The damage to his suit appears to be from nothing other than the barrage of shots that sent him through the window, and the resulting fall. I also checked out ASM #536, and without giving away any spoilers, it and CW #5 don't even remotely match up. They're like two completely different stories. Now, that may be peachy keen for some of you. It's not enough for the rest of us.

go ahead and spill the beans. Just put a "spoiler alert" on the post. I want to know, but I sure won't be buying the book so,...spill
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"