http://www.slashfilm.com/article.php/20061009brokeback-mountain
Its so utterly ridculous but why do I have a bad feeling about this?
Its so utterly ridculous but why do I have a bad feeling about this?
LadyMoira said:Relax...Jake's agent publicly denied the rumor.
fabman said:there were rumors that gyllenhaal signed on to play dent but the agent pretty much denied his involvement.
ampersand said:Why do you type God, G-d?
raybia said:Actually, it following what many Jewish leaders had previously started doing. Spelling it that way to:
Specify that we are referring to THE GOD worshipped by Jews, Christians, and Muslims
and
Because we recognize clearly that the opposite spelling is DOG. So while no offense to dogs, we just choose to write it that way out of respect and love for our creator.
It doesn't offend me to see it spelt out by others, I just don't choose to write it like that for the reasons above.
What's so gimmicky? Two actors are in a movie after just being in a highly talked about oscar-winning film. No biggie.ANTHONYNASTI said:This won't happen. Nolan is smart enough to know how gimmicky this would come across as.
Crooklyn said:What's so gimmicky? Two actors are in a movie after just being in a highly talked about oscar-winning film. No biggie.
Are you talking to me?StorminNorman said:Yes, because having a Oscar Nominated actor in a film is always a bad thing.
Exactly, let the film do it's job. Not like Heath and Jake (if cast) would be sharing much screentime together anyway.Fenrir said:Yeah. Besides, already there are more than enough "Batman is gay" puns out there so it's not like it's going to make a huge difference. The film will speak for itself. Everything else is just inane blabbering.
Crooklyn said:What's so gimmicky? Two actors are in a movie after just being in a highly talked about oscar-winning film. No biggie.
Crooklyn said:Are you talking to me?
It's only a gimmick if the sole reason Nolan cast Jake was to attract hype and cause a ruckus. Otherwise, it's a simple coincedence. And like I said before, it's the film's job to make sure TDK stands on it's own, and not a reunion of BM.ANTHONYNASTI said:Normally, I wouldn't have a problem with it. But considering the film is Brokeback Mountain, which quickly became imbedded into pop culture through various jokes and negative press (not talking about reviews and overall reaction to the film itself), it comes off as a bit gimmicky to cast the two main actors of that movie in two very important parts.
I wouldn't mind those choices either. It's just annoying as hell everyone is so afraid of this BM connection. Chances are, no one will be talking about it in 2 years time. People find new things to talk about, the media is a fast paced outlet.I myself am pushing for either Schreiber or DiCaprio.
The only people that reference Batman gay jokes are fans of the comic(more so the old comics). The fans of Batman comics make up a very small amount of the Batman movie audience.Fenrir said:Yeah. Besides, already there are more than enough "Batman is gay" puns out there so it's not like it's going to make a huge difference.
As if the Oscars actually celebrate quality. For that matter let's have Ben Affleck and Matt Damon write The Dark Knight, they actually won oscars for their writing.StorminNorman said:Yes, because having a Oscar Nominated actor in a film is always a bad thing.
Punch said:As if the Oscars actually celebrate quality. For that matter let's have Ben Affleck and Matt Damon write The Dark Knight, they actually won oscars for their writing.
StorminNorman said:So you are trying to say that Jake Gyllenhaal is a poor actor?
Pretty irrational thing to say. What's the basis of thinking that?Punch said:The only reason he would be cast is because he's popular.