On Reading Reviews: A Different Vision for Us?

Ursavior01 said:
Yeah the picture is total photoshop. The color tone of the different character are totally off. Bobby is too bright and pale looking and so is Collosus.

Bobby looks as bright as he does in the TV spot ('We're not kids anymore'). It's the lighting from the basement.
 
There might have been some lighting problems, but I think that the photo is ultimately real and there could've been a few digital touch-ups on a few things (i.e., Beast's suit)

-TNC
 
WHY did they even bother putting Angel in an X uniform??! I can kinda understand why they did it with Cyclops, familiarity and all but it baffles me why they'd mislead us with Angel in uniform! Nightcrawler was never in uniform!
 
Storm22 said:
WHY did they even bother putting Angel in an X uniform??! I can kinda understand why they did it with Cyclops, familiarity and all but it baffles me why they'd mislead us with Angel in uniform! Nightcrawler was never in uniform!


True. I thought we were going back to our theory + running time? hehe :)
 
Aw crap, I ruined something else for myself, didn't I?

Is that why there's so much fussing about this photo? Is it because Angel supposedly doesn't wear a uniform in some of the early screenings?

-TNC
 
Ursavior01 said:
Phantom zone? Is that our group name? What about The Inner Circle...like Hell Fire club :).

I'd just like to think of our group as......RIGHT!:up:
 
Storm22 said:
I'd just like to think of our group as......RIGHT!:up:

What's wrong with The Inner Circle...fits with the Dark Phoenix Saga. I saw the cartoon last night.
 
The Original Bamfer said:
But it is a secret because FOX, themselves, have not seemed to officialy release it! Sure, the BBFC or whatever did - but its probably because they got the press version. That doesn't mean its the final cut. Wow... I mean, I trust Darkie totally...

I'm with you there! Darkie has always been reliable, and for my part, I'm rather inclined to believe her until I actually clock the movie for myself on May 26th and see if it's other wise.
 
I trust PWR too and he clocked the press screening as 95mins including credits.
 
Storm22 said:
I trust PWR too and he clocked the press screening as 95mins including credits.

I trust myself cause I'm going to see it at midnight.
 
I read one today and said that who thinks that there won't be a X4 will have to see all the credits from X3.

Is there hope?
 
WorthyStevens4 said:

Yep he clocked ot from the marvel logo to when the end lights went up! He said the end credits were only 4 or 5 mins. Now if the total press screening running time was 95mins then the length of footage must have been around 90 mins. The official running time is 103mins which means around 97 mins of actual footage. 7 mins is a big difference imo.
Then of course we have Darkie's clocked 1hr 50mins! CONFUSION!!
 
Hope is lost. My free screening of X-men 3 at work.

Friday, June 30 X-MEN: THE LAST STAND 6:30 & 9:00pm
When a cure is found to treat mutations, lines are drawn amongst the X-Men, led by Professor Charles Xavier
(Stewart), and the Brotherhood, a band of powerful mutants organized under Xavier's former ally, Magneto
(McKellen).
Starring: Hugh Jackman, Patrick Stewart, Ian McKellen
MPAA Rating: PG-13 Running Time: 1 hr. 44 min.
 
But I am still not going to lose hope. 1 hour 50minutes still sound better.
 
Ursavior01 said:
But I am still not going to lose hope. 1 hour 50minutes still sound better.

Do you not understand what I'm trying to get across?! According to PWR the press screening was 95mins with credits meaning 90/91mins without!! With the official running time at 103mins that means around a running time of 96/97 mins without credits.
That's a 7min approx. difference in the run time of the press screening and the official film meaning there could be additional footage in the official theatrical cut.
 
Storm22 said:
Do you not understand what I'm trying to get across?! According to PWR the press screening was 95mins with credits meaning 90/91mins without!! With the official running time at 103mins that means around a running time of 96/97 mins without credits.
That's a 7min approx. difference in the run time of the press screening and the official film meaning there could be additional footage in the official theatrical cut.


Yes I understand that.
 
Running time shouldn't be much of a worry then. I'm no longer concerned about it.
 
Storm22 said:
Do you not understand what I'm trying to get across?! According to PWR the press screening was 95mins with credits meaning 90/91mins without!! With the official running time at 103mins that means around a running time of 96/97 mins without credits.
That's a 7min approx. difference in the run time of the press screening and the official film meaning there could be additional footage in the official theatrical cut.
Hmmm. I wonder what could be in that extra seven minutes. And Darkie clocked 110 minutes without credits, right? Storm22 you better be in charge of the contradicting times, with/without credits, because they confuse me. Can you sum it up?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

  • C. Lee
    Superherohype Administrator

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,374
Messages
22,093,838
Members
45,888
Latest member
amyfan32
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"