So, in other words: 3d is always darker than 2d.No it isn't. Not in a theater with proper calibrations and bulb usage (well, as long as the movie itself is color timed properly)
I'm just glad they made an effort to distance themselves from the past films. I liked that there was no Pearl or that old crew. They were great, but it was better without them. I just loved seeing Jack and Barbossa on their own and not being tied down to Will and Elizabeth's stories. It was so nice.
I think Angelica finding the voodoo doll on the beach is just a playful thing. I doubt it will go anywhere. I would prefer for a different love interest in each film.
And in the next film, he can have the Pearl. We don't need to see them get it out of the bottle. Jack just can escape from some place and Gibbs can have the sails go up.
And I'd say go in the opposite direction for Jack's brother. Go with someone like Hugh Jackman. They should be complete opposites. A well respected conventional society type. Someone who Jack cannot stand. It would make no goddamn sense to use Brand. Yes, they share similar mannerisms, but Jack became like he is now because of bein trapped on that island. He was never like that beforehand. So for Brand to be like him is stupid.
free ticket here. i told them give me a f.... 2D ticket. f... you hollywood.
-i was shocked how digital the movie looked
-i was shocked what a mess the story was. its like they learned nothign from POTC3. to many characters,to many stories.
-i was shocked how small the movie was in scope. let me guess......80% of the budget was used on the paychecks for Depp and Jerry Bruckheimer?
-i was shocked that the movie looked like an expensive tv episode

free ticket here. i told them give me a f.... 2D ticket. f... you hollywood.
-i was shocked how digital the movie looked
-i was shocked what a mess the story was. its like they learned nothign from POTC3. to many characters,to many stories.
-i was shocked how small the movie was in scope. let me guess......80% of the budget was used on the paychecks for Depp and Jerry Bruckheimer?
-i was shocked that the movie looked like an expensive tv episode
and not obvious hetero.Saw it again. I think I hate it.
Give me all the stupid **** in AWE any day...atleast Jack was who he is...a lying, backstabbing, bastard.

and not obvious hetero.
in the first movie it was not sure if he likes man or women .or if he even cares
its like Disney had to force on us '' hey Depp is playing a character that likes girls''.
hahahhahahhahahahha![]()
was there a bit after the credits ?
Saw it. The mermaid love story was weak and forced. Blackbeard was a softie, he should have been way more evil. Angelica was annoying as hell.
Here's my real nitpick on the movie:
Why did Blackbeard need the fountain of youth to escape the prophecy of being killed by the one legged man?
I mean.... The fountain of youth does not make one immortal. It only gives you extra years of life that are taken from another life. You only are able to live longer. Still if you take for example 20 eyars from another life, a sword of bullet will still kill you as you are not immortal. So even if Blackbeard would have gotten 30 extra years from the fountain of youth, the one legged man would still kill him. The fountain of youth would have never saved Blackbeard from the one legged man.
the worst part about the zombies was that the make-up on the zombies was minimal. i mean TV_budget_cheap. they didnt even use a lot of make up.the zombies looked really cheap and lame. you don't need to go over the top, but this movie was more expensive than dead man's chest and it had nothing to show. to me it could have been made with a smaller budget than first pirates.

t:a small POTC movie would be fine if the ticket price would be low. you pay the same amount of money.
Did you demand Black Swan cost you no more than $3?Black Swan's story and acting deserves the full ticket price.This has to be the most backwards thing I have read in here.
Pay less if the movie costs less?Did you demand Black Swan cost you no more than $3?
