<Algrim apparently isn't fighting Thor>
How about this: we've kicked around the idea of there being a flashback that shows how half of Malekith's face got to be the way it is. Maybe in that same confrontation, Algrim gets turned into Kurse. So we establish Algrim as a warrior of Svartalfheim, and then set it up for Kurse's later appearances, in the present-day, in the movie.
It could go several directions using this. It could be that Malekith betrays Algrim (but apparently not while Algrim is fighting Thor). It could be that Malekith is trying to make a super-dark-elf, but the spell doesn't go right, there's a big explosion, we get Kurse and Malekith gets a half burned face. It could be the attack that gives Malekith also strikes Algrim, and in the process of patching him up, Algrim winds up being Kurse, like Frankenstein's monster.
Picking up the redemption arc idea we had for Kurse a while back, it could be that the dark elves are all told about how irredeemably evil the Asgardians are. Somewhere along the line, Kurse sees that the true picture is more nuanced. (Maybe when the spell goes wrong, Malekith leaves him to die, and some Asgardian magic user (Odin if in the past, possibly Loki if in the present) stabilizes him (and if it's Loki, it doesn't have to be a post-redemption Loki. It could be that he does it for his own purposes, to have a marker in Svartalfheim).)
Maybe Kurse relates his origin to some of the other characters, in the way that Beta Ray Bill tells Odin and Thor his story (accompanied with flashbacks).
I think it works well to have the change be some point in the past. In the Simonson run, it's over a year in real time before we see Kurse again (from issue 348 to 364, as I recall)
At least in Simonson's telling. Maybe they've cooked up something new here
That would be cool!
Agreed.
I said:
My talk of craters is causing you to do a rewrite? Sorry about that! But it would be a shame to have some big fights without tearing up the turf!
What issue are you through?
Yeah.
<Thor and Loki fighting>
I agree. Maybe they will yell at each other. It would give Loki a chance to use some of that venom he has in the books.
Well, when those Bourne Woods pictures first came out, I remember 04nbod made a comment about his braids. At the time I thought she was referring to how there's a lot of hair from the top of his head pulled back with about 3 bands at the back of his head near the crown. Later, when the University of Greenwich pictures came out, I saw the braids on the side of his head and remembered her comment. Still later, I saw another Bourne Woods picture where I thought I saw a little braid near his ear just like in University of Greenwich.
I think the Bourne Woods pictures are longer shots (basically people sitting in the woods photographing from afar). The braids are pretty small. So they will be hard to distinguish, especially from afar and especially if his hair is matted from sweat or dirt.
Here's another factor: the braids appear to be asymmetric. There appear to be more braids on the right side than on the left side. Compare, especially, pictures 4 and 5 from this post:
http://forums.superherohype.com/showpost.php?p=24629101&postcount=7
Now if you look at this picture from Bourne Woods,
http://forums.superherohype.com/showpost.php?p=24304355&postcount=4, we see Bobby Holland Hanton's right side, and it looks like he might have a braid. We see Chris Hemsworth's left side, and he does not. Most of the images we have of Chris Hemsworth from Bourne Woods show primarily his left side.
Edit: here's the picture of Bobby Holland Hanton in the sleeveless costume in Iceland:
http://forums.superherohype.com/showpost.php?p=24598945&postcount=539 It's kind of hard to tell, but it looks like he might have a braid on the right side. None on the left.
Now, having said far more than I ever would have thought I would about braids, I'll say that your hypothesis is nevertheless possible. I still wonder about hair length every time I look at those photos.
Actually, looking at them again, I think the hair length may indeed be different. Look at the first photo here:
http://forums.superherohype.com/showpost.php?p=24629093&postcount=6. The hair extends to about where the cape is no longer fastened to the metal support structure underneath it (see also the 2nd and 5th picture). Now go back and look at Bobby Holland Hanton again. His hair extends further down. His head is roughly in the same position as Hemsworth's in that first picture in the link in this paragraph, so the hair ought to be lying roughly the same in the two pictures.
(which could really mess up your summary!)