Ps3 to load discs slower than the 360?

Shodan said:
All girls are like that, even Canadian's :(

Yeah, there are few girls like that here too.
It's just that girls in my city are known in like....pretty much all of the country for being materialistic *****es.
But there are good girls.
 
Girl-sombrero.jpg
 
Fixed it up a bit for ya:
owned.jpg




Topdawg said:
People that have friends, or siblings usually buy a second controller.
to play fighting games and sports games and such.

Have friends. They own their own 360s, so they bring theirs along with them. Also play a lot with people on LIVE which requires no multiple controllers on my side of the world.
 
imdaly said:
Fixed it up a bit for ya:
owned.jpg






Have friends. They own their own 360s, so they bring theirs along with them. Also play a lot with people on LIVE which requires no multiple controllers on my side of the world.



You forgot one















notneeded.jpg
 
Yum Yum Barbara

That nipple nipple is kinda cutting it close :o
 
So add 40 dollars for a PS3 headset. Still very comparable.
 
Aran said:
So add 40 dollars for a PS3 headset. Still very comparable.

It would only be comparable if everybody NEEDED all those accessories...and even still you underappreciate the value of choice.
 
Aran said:
You don't like the truth I take it. :confused:

YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!!!!!!















....sorry...couldn't help it :D
 
imdaly said:
It would only be comparable if everybody NEEDED all those accessories...and even still you underappreciate the value of choice.

What they need and don't need doesn't really matter as much, the two things that people care about from these systems is that they both play games, and can go online. Microsoft says you have choice, yes, but people are not buying the core unit at all, so they've made their choice about which features they want.

It's not as if you can just say you want online: you have to buy the hard drive, which is 100 dollars, and the mechandise that really matters is all dependent on you having online (Headset for instance), and the rest seems to be useless status items (like a wireless controller or charger).

You have a single choice: between a system without online and a system with online. For the 360. You have to pay a yearly fee for that online on top of the 100 dollar hard drive (which equalizes the price between the Core and Premium anyway) so it's important to consider that in a choice.

The only thing Microsoft has given the consumers a choice over is a lower priced unit that no one wants to buy, and a higher priced one that does everything everybody wants anyway. The Low End PS3 (at least in the short 5-6 years term) will do everything everyone wants to do with it beyond playing the games and going online, and output in that 1080 resolution for high definition movies.

If you want to play the Xbox 360 system online (which the majority of people seem to) then you're getting a Premium 360. Then you also have to pay a yearly fee, which adds up, that you don't have to pay with the PS3.

Hence, despite the higher entry price of the PS3, they are comparable way more then I think a lot of people consider them to be.

They (Microsoft) offer you more options, yes, but they are all leading to the same thing, and when the hard drive for the 360 packs in all of the features that come with the premium version and makes the two units cost the same, that's not much choice at all. You can not pick and choose, truely, just between a crippled model and a great model.
 
LMAO! How freaking bad can you get, saying that you played 360 games demos then actually going about how MS sucks arse.


Do you think we'll take you seriously here? Please.


BTW in case you haven't noticed....Sony fanboys aren't legion here...


And no the PS3 ain't comparable. It's freaking 600$
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"