- Jul 14, 2002
- Reaction score
How about McAdams for Spider-Man 4?
BT18 said:Isn't she like 8 years older than Kirsten Dunst?
If they replace Toby and Kirsten for a new few movies, which I think they should after SM3, (or atleast I think they should also replace Tobey when they inevitably replace the inevitably gone Kirsten) they're going to go with actors a few years younger to keep them going at around the same age, not a decade older than they already had.
She looks pretty good when dolled up, but she's really in the same average league as Kirsten, all together. Maybe a better face, but a much inferior body. And I believe shorter (less model like).
Catman said:Yeah, Rachel is 29 right now. She'll be in here `30s if she plays MJ. But, that doesn't matter. Tobey is older than Peter Parker and I doubt they want younger. These characters are getting older in each film. By Spider-Man 4 they'll be in their mid-late `20s and dedicated to their profession.
spideyboy_1111 said:too bad she comes off more as gwen.. rather then a hot sexy kitten... shes not MJ ... or ive yet to see her act like one in a movie.. though she probably could pull it off... i liked her in mean girls
White_Howling said:for the next three?