Or he could end up another underwhelming Malekith style villain. Serviceable villains is what we have gotten for more most MCU movies and when people say now that Spidey is part of the MCU, now we see some great villains in the movies, was Vulture one of the villains they were talking about? I don't see how Vulture is going to be better then most of the underwhelming MCU villains we saw in the past.
Here is my question, what does Vulture bring to the table that Green Goblin doesn't?
I meant that has traditionally been a serviceable villain in the comics.
Unlike the Green Goblin, the Vulture hasn't been seen before on screen. So that means he also wasn't very recently butchered on screen. He's also a classic character which gives him points over any rogue created since the late 80's. They're not using Morlun in a movie anytime soon. He has a different dynamic to Peter Parker (none) and Spider-Man than the legacy and close family like relationship that Parker has with the Osborns.
Sandman in Spider-Man 3 was built upon compared to his comic character, and while I don't agree with all the story decisions involved with the character a lot of his scenes still work very well in the context of the movie. Dr. Octopus in Spider-Man 2 is also pretty different than the Otto Octavius that was introduced in the '60 but equally compelling in the movie. Maybe even more so than a straight adaptation would have been.
Plenty of other villains have been re-evaluated and re-interpreted from comic to screen to successful results so I don't see why Vulture automatically isn't capable.