Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]323492[/split]
Agreed, except for the acting. This film was really aweful, The Last Airbender level of bad, i'm shocked this film received so much praise in this threadDud out of *****
An absolute abomination on every level.
Braindead, illogical script
piss poor, blunt-as-a-shovel-to-the-face storytelling
ridiculously bad cliches done ad nauseum
raping of physics
hilarious, bottom-of-the-barrel special effects
pointless over-stuffing of useless peripheral characters for the sake of fan service
terrible acting
pointless, headache-inducing slapstick.
I'm not even going to bother with the whole "killing off Deadpool's trademark" complaint, but I will ask this...
What was the purpose of sealing off his mouth in the first place? Did they not have any mutants who had a power that was used through the mouth? If they had control of Deadpool, why couldn't they just prevent him from talking? It just seems like a flimsy excuse to remove his most notable asset because the producers, allegedly, think that a talking Deadpool wouldn't make a good villain.
Crap as a Wolverine film, crap as a connection to the established film series' continuity, and just a terrible film in general.
6/10
6/10
The Logan/Victor dynamic makes up for the bad CGI & weak villians
I wonder what you 2 would consider a bad movie.