The Infernal
Mky Mk
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2005
- Messages
- 10,984
- Reaction score
- 1,133
- Points
- 103
Maybe they wouldn't have given Raimi 100 percent creative control but much more than would be willing to after a critically panned SM3.
Most complaints about SM3 had nothing to do with Venom which is what Sony tinkered with.
Raimi owns many of the faults from SM3 completely.
Lots of good movies have had studio interference. It's up to the director to make the best out of it.
You imagine, but with it being just a hypothetical that is just your guess. I take the opposite view. I don't see a good reason for Sony to suddenly change how they work with Raimi if SM3 had a better reception than it did.
Sony interfered with more than just Venom. Did you just think Sony asked "could we maybe just add one little thing" and left Raimi to it? Raimi does still own the failure of SM3 in my eyes, but I'm not one to dismiss Sony's involvement out of hand.