Re-Start or Hulk 2?

Which one would you prefer?

  • Re-Start the franchise

  • Hulk 2


Results are only viewable after voting.
Golgo13:The Hitman said:
The problem with the fick wasn't with the character devlopement nor the story, is was the way the story was executed on screen and the choice of the villan.
The cgi as awesome to me...well most of it......

No but that's what a lot of people seem to think.
 
Obi-Ron said:
Not bad, but I can do without Joe Fixit.

Nor do I, really. But I think that since they most likely will put a grey Hulk in there, I'd be fine with using him as an early-generation monster that isn't as powerful...two birds, one stone.

I also feel like it's really important to have two fights, the first one being Hulk losing. Part of the excitement in Tales to Astonish 90/91 was the Hulk being beaten - not so common a thing in those days. I think it'd mean more to the overall story and restore the coolest thing about the Hulk: that "oh crap..." moment when you know a beatdown is coming.
 
I'd like to see Banner come back and the reason is because he thinks he has figured out a way cure himself. Possibly resulting in Joe Fix it or just a grey Hulk. Then in doing this he realises he didn't cure himself and creates the Hulk Busters.
 
I liked The Hulk. Not great, not bad. I say a sequel, but if it was a remake I wouldn't mind, if done better.
 
Image said:
I liked The Hulk. Not great, not bad. I say a sequel, but if it was a remake I wouldn't mind, if done better.

Did you get the DVD? I want to know if the features are any good.
 
They were OK. Oddly, they could put a "Sunny Delight" ad on the DVD, but not the movie's trailers.
 
We already saw the cure for mutants in X-men 3.
Though if Banner does try to cure himself, it should be like the comics (Tales to Astonish 90/91).
They can do it with out the grey Hulk. Just when he's about to cure himself, the military police capture him like in the comic. At the end Abomination throws a car at Betty and that makes the Hulk so angry he gets strong enough to beat him.
 
do you think if we get a grey hulk we can get grey hulk dogs too? lame-o
 
Hugebear said:
We already saw the cure for mutants in X-men 3.
Though if Banner does try to cure himself, it should be like the comics (Tales to Astonish 90/91).
They can do it with out the grey Hulk. Just when he's about to cure himself, the military police capture him like in the comic. At the end Abomination throws a car at Betty and that makes the Hulk so angry he gets strong enough to beat him.

The biggest difference about the Tales To Astonish story was that Banner was NOT trying to cure himself - he was trying to kill himself. The Hulk had been taken control of by the Stranger and when he reverted back to Banner, made the decision that he was too great a threat to be left alive. He had intended to overdose on the gamma...

While the Stranger stuff isn't going to make the cut in the sequel, it would be very easy to have Banner create such a machine after coming to from an opening rampage...
 
Yeah, I never THOUGHT on that before..........:ghost:
 
WHY the hell would ya' want THAT???!!
 
Hulk2

Do away with the Split screen action - it was annoying and distracting.

Villan - something or someone more realistic.

Storyline with substance - Quality over quantity tho.

Get rid of those dogs they were dumb.

Hulks ultimate challenge tho I think should be Banner himself.
 
I'd say the split-screen thing drastically added to the suspenseful momentum of the flick...wouldn't you say?.....
 
hulkwillsmash said:
The biggest difference about the Tales To Astonish story was that Banner was NOT trying to cure himself - he was trying to kill himself. The Hulk had been taken control of by the Stranger and when he reverted back to Banner, made the decision that he was too great a threat to be left alive. He had intended to overdose on the gamma...

While the Stranger stuff isn't going to make the cut in the sequel, it would be very easy to have Banner create such a machine after coming to from an opening rampage...


I know he was trying to kill himself, but I was talking about the cure idea (look at the posts about the cure). I changed it to cure because it didn't make sense that he would try to kill himself by getting hit by the same gamma rays that created the Hulk.
But now we have seen the cure in X-men 3 and FF4, so now I guess he should try to kill himself instead.
I think Banner should be able to die. Then people would be afraid that he could die. There would be a sense of danger when he is Banner. He should try to shoot his brains out first. :D
 
hulkwillsmash said:
The biggest difference about the Tales To Astonish story was that Banner was NOT trying to cure himself - he was trying to kill himself. The Hulk had been taken control of by the Stranger and when he reverted back to Banner, made the decision that he was too great a threat to be left alive. He had intended to overdose on the gamma...

While the Stranger stuff isn't going to make the cut in the sequel, it would be very easy to have Banner create such a machine after coming to from an opening rampage...


Yeah, that would sound about right. :marv:
 
Restart or Hulk 2? Somewhere in between. The story should continue with Banner on the run and no rehashed origin. But there should be a new director (much of Ang's work on the first was very good - but it didn't connect with the public, and he doesn't want to do another one anyway), and a new lead actor playing Bruce Banner/Hulk (Eric Bana's lacklustre central performance was a big problem in the first film). The style and tone should be fast-paced and action-packed, but still maintain a deeper dramatic integrity.
 
"iF: So will you be recasting HULK with completely new actors?



ARAD: It’s a “do-over”. I loved the HULK movie, it was just a different approach, and it wasn’t exactly the comic. We want to be much closer to the comic. It’s what we would rather do."

Well it seems like they're doing a restart and by the sound of it Hulk will be like FF or X3 - all flash and no substance... Arad is dumbing down all of Marvel's properties.
 
DTX said:
WHY the hell would ya' want THAT???!!

No kidding, they should go with Hulk 2.

jrd550 said:
"iF: So will you be recasting HULK with completely new actors?



ARAD: It’s a “do-over”. I loved the HULK movie, it was just a different approach, and it wasn’t exactly the comic. We want to be much closer to the comic. It’s what we would rather do."

Well it seems like they're doing a restart and by the sound of it Hulk will be like FF or X3 - all flash and no substance... Arad is dumbing down all of Marvel's properties.

Doesn't mean that they'll re-do it. He might've meant that they might make it more like the comic in Hulk 2.
 
Hulk 1 was PERFECT! Just accept it as it is!!@
 
I have to say that I'm not a fan of Ang Lee's "Hulk".

BUT...

I don't think a 'restart' is needed at all. Hulk wasn't that bad of a movie to redo the cast and everything else. In fact, it's stupid. They already had a great cast. I liked Banna...and how can you replace Jennifer Connerlly? Is that FRIGGIN' LEGAL?

I just think that Batman Begins, and I love that movie, probably started a dangerous thread in Hollywood when it comes to 'restarts'. Hollywood would always take a good thing and ruin it by abusing a concept or misinterpret the original intent.
 
DTX said:
Hulk 1 was PERFECT! Just accept it as it is!!@

I wouldnt say its perfect. I think the end scene where hulk fought his pops was pretty bad. Well maybe we should wait and see how part 2 ends up. If thats good then forget a restart. If its really bad, then wait some years and redo the series.
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"