Okay Chris, so your entire argument is to downplay, oversimplify, and based on your personal ignorance and not what real life is about or law. It's likely I don't need to reply back to after this...the recurring theme here is you don't know what you are talking about. Alright here we go....
FINE. OKAY.
I think someone with a gun, whose freaking out about how lethal the other person can be without a gun...probably should have a gun because they will make stupid decisions.
When someone begins to strike you, a giant like Brown, it is not beyond comprehension to fear for your life.
Injuries actually sustained is moot, the lethality of fists is a reality. Like a mentioned in my original post. Law enforcement are trained and educated that someone unarmed are still potential threats until an arrest is made. FBI murder stats:
726 deaths in 2011
Brown attacked Wilson in the police car, punched him, and possibly reached for his gun--which on it's own rights is enough to get you killed (
verified by forensics)
He wasn't a giant compared to Officer Wilson. So, no, not in this case. Not a GIANT.
You're ignoring weight, again.
He wasn't a huge man compared to Wilson. I think to say someone SHOULD BE KILLED for using his fists is incredible unfair to say, and I think it's an ignorant thing to say. If under ever single case, someone shot an unarmed person...that would be a horrible defense. It wouldn't hold up because it's laughable. Police officers have a difficult job, so assessing if they're in a life threatening situation is part of the defense that goes into any of their shooting.
First statement is just not true.
If you attack someone else, regardless if you are armed or not, the person you are attacking has the right to apply whatever force is necessary to defend themselves. This does hold up in court...many times. Last part, well, yes that goes without saying. The key is
not that the situation itself was life threatening, using the power of hindsight that his injuries weren't that severe--of course not because he shot Brown, it could have been worse if there is a prolonged struggle--but whether
at the time that it was occuring you felt your life is threatened.
Getting attacked by Michael Brown and having a likely, according to DNA evidence supporting this story, wrestle for your side arm IS life threatening. Not only that but Brown can be considered a threat to others as well, which was actually proven moments before the incident even happened. So as that moment is occuring, no hindsight, you are the person to make the decision to shoot. Officer Wilson made that decision, and the law supports that decision too
I think someone who is fearful of being killed by a fist is probably a coward whose never been in a fight, or is really small and easily overmatched.
I guess police officers should kill people more often, what with all those people walking around with their lethal weapon hands...
Not a coward but someone who actually knows how dangerous someone can be. Blows to the head are SERIOUS. You don't even have to be smaller than your attacker, and to say such a thing is....well, I have to keep saying it...narrowminded.
Now I didn't, so there you go.
I think your argument about his fists being lethal doesn't hold up. I've seen the video, and he strong armed someone who was much smaller than him. Wilson isn't. It sounds to me like you're saying that Brown deserved to be killed because he COULD have been dangerous, which is absurd.
You need to try and not be so paranoid about everyone's fists all being 'lethal weapons'. You could even argue that him going for Wilson's gun, which Wilson testified to, could be more of a reason.
The "I was afraid of his fists" defense seems laughable to me.
FBI murder stats:
726 deaths in 2011 due to hands, feet...murders by people who are
unarmed
I didn't say anyone deserved to be killed, stop being silly, but that Officer Wilson's decision to kill Brown falls within the confines of law.
Brown was certainly a physical threat, forcefully robbed a store, attacked a police officer, possibly reached for his gun (again, evidence I linked shows struggle happened in officer Wilson's vehicle). The "kid" was no angel
The last statement is such a silly oversimplification. It baffles me if you can actually be seriously this naive