GuestStar2004
Avenger
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2004
- Messages
- 23,861
- Reaction score
- 1,723
- Points
- 103
So we can be sure she has a better role then in X3? We can be sure of that now
I was thinking that maybe at the end of the movie we will see not only Jean Grey and Scott Summers resurrected, but an infant Nathan Christopher Summers as well...
that would be something pretty special, and a huge moment for Cyclops and Jean fans
Honestly, I think Cyclops will never get his due as long as X-Men films are being made by Bryan Singer. I'd like to be wrong, but...
There were also those pictures of James Marsden in Montreal at the same time that DOFP was filming there. I think that when Singer was that Cyclops "won't be in the film" he actually means that "he won't have a big role." I think that Cyclops might reappear as a cameo, possibly to set up the next movie.
Corrected.
I think Singer had a bone to pick with that character from Day One. Cyclops was always been used as a throwaway character imo, and not one of the main heroes of X-Men.
No, Singer has nothing against Cyclops, that's a dumb thing to say. The movie where Cyclops was really screwed over (X3) was the one that Singer had NOTHING to do with. Cyclops got a decent-sized role on X1 and there were reasons for him not being in X2 much. Singer was going to make him the focus in his version of X3, so he's got nothing against Cyclops.Corrected.
I think Singer had a bone to pick with that character from Day One. Cyclops was always been used as a throwaway character imo, and not one of the main heroes of X-Men.
No, Singer has nothing against Cyclops, that's a dumb thing to say. The movie where Cyclops was really screwed over (X3) was the one that Singer had NOTHING to do with. Cyclops got a decent-sized role on X1 and there were reasons for him not being in X2 much. Singer was going to make him the focus in his version of X3, so he's got nothing against Cyclops.