sad lieutenant
Civilian
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2007
- Messages
- 976
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
Again, it's one of those examples that highlights the awkwardness of translating something like WATCHMEN, specifically designed to be the ultimate in printed sequential art which used (and abused!) every single tool in the comic book box o' tricks, to another medium such as film.
The simple use of differently drawn speech bubbles visually tells the reader straight away that Rorschach is all f ucked up after working the Roche case. If Jackie E uses two as noticably different methods of actual speech in the movie, will the audience necessarily pick up on the change itself and suss out the reason for it? Will it come across as convincing when actually heard in Dolby/THX/whatever as opposed to being created by the reader's own imagination, or just a tad, well... silly?
Agreed... And how ais Snyder and Co going to indicate that it is Rorschach speaking in a wide shot with a bunch of characters? I'm thinking of the meeting of the Minutemen, pre-child-molestor immolation. No creepy voice, you cannot depict talk bubbles on the screen -- and he's wearing a rag over his head with shifting, symmetrical blots on it.
My arch-fear is that they have the blots move whenever Rorschach speaks -- like a oscilloscope of sorts. And I have a greater and totally irrational fear that as the blots shift, they're going to have some awful foley-effect.