Ace of Knaves
Avenger
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2008
- Messages
- 31,200
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 31
He probably would...
Yea but who in their right mind would want to wait another 15 odd years to see Joker again? By then I will be nearly 40 years old. That is donkeys years away. The demand for Joker wouldn't allow that to happen.
Well to get technical Heath Ledger only had about 25-30 mins screen time as Joker
Seriously man, you remind me of one of those dip ****s from the "RETIREZ TEH JOKER!!!111" website.
Now Heath Ledger is not the Joker. He just played him in one film. He did a superb job no doubt. But that don't mean ****.
If I remember rightly Alec Baldwin did a great job bringing Jack Ryan to life. But then all of a sudden he turned into Harrison Ford!!! Oh noez!!!!1111
Besides ITS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN so quit daydreaming about.
Heath Ledger's Joker was an amazing achievement in acting performances why have someone else come in and just try and imitate him?
The story doesn't need for Joker, yes the public in Gotham still doesnt know about Dent's fall into madness but you could easily have a villain like The Riddler come in next film and he could figure it out him self and tell the people of gotham city
I'm not insulting you, well, not in a childish way. You are like those idiots on the retire the Joker website, sorry to break it to ya.
And I'm not saying he should return for no reason. I don't want him thrown in there just for the sake of it.
I'm saying that his inclusion shouldn't just be written off just because Heath put in a barnstorming performance.
Saying "No one can top Ledgers Joker!!" is exactly the same principle as all the people who were slamming the decision to cast him in the first place and saying "No on can top Nicholsons Joker!!"
Don't fall into that trap man.
Nicholson Joker was very easy to suprpass infact most people thought it was Jack acting like Jack
Heath Ledgers performance is something people will be talking about for years and years to come i dont know why everyone all of a sudden is so quick to have someone else play him
Nicholson Joker was very easy to suprpass infact most people thought it was Jack acting like Jack...
Imitation perhaps is not the right word. But if they include him in the next Nolan movie, they would have to consider the appearance, the personality and the mannerisms of the character, otherwise it would break the continuity, which is not a good thing in my book.
Uhh did Alec Baldwin get an oscar?
Thats a horrible comparison Alec Baldwis Jack Ryan wasn't evne close to memorable
You can sit here and use your childish insults because iam disagreeing with you but the fact of the mater is that the a good majority of the public right now when you tell them Joker the first thing that comes into there mind is Heath Ledger
Besides ITS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN so quit daydreaming about.
Heath Ledger's Joker was an amazing achievement in acting performances why have someone else come in and just try and imitate him?
The story doesn't need for Joker, yes the public in Gotham still doesnt know about Dent's fall into madness but you could easily have a villain like The Riddler come in next film and he could figure it out him self and tell the people of gotham city
You act like Joker is THE ONLY ONE who knew what really happened
Nicholson Joker was very easy to suprpass infact most people thought it was Jack acting like Jack
Nicholson Joker was very easy to suprpass infact most people thought it was Jack acting like Jack
Heath Ledgers performance is something people will be talking about for years and years to come i dont know why everyone all of a sudden is so quick to have someone else play him
Bare with me, but if IF the Joker was to be recast then I would love to see Benicio Del Toro as the Joker. He's truly a cameleon.