Sequels Same continuity or reboot?

Reboot or continuation

  • same continuity for one more movie (Spider-Man 4)

  • Same continuity for three more movies (through Spider-Man 6)

  • Same continuity indefinitely (untill they stop making Spider-Man movies all together)

  • reboot.


Results are only viewable after voting.
I know I will get flamed for this, but I'm going to say it anyways:

A re-boot would be nice, let the franshise take a break for about 5 years, then re-boot the whole thing. Sami Rami, while he does have a idea what spiderman is about, seems to have gotten caught up in a "I want to make the Spider-Man world my own" idea, where Spidey doesn't need a mask, and he can stand behind a whole crowd of people without it on, or save a speeding bus, and no one ever sees him, knows who he is, or is smart enough to report what he looks like and cash in on a reward. Also, Sandman really killed Ben Parker, and where Harry is neither the Green Goblin or the Hobgoblin, just some whacked out guy who threw rockets on his snowboard and missed the X-Games.

Also, Rami screwed Spider-Man in Spider-Man 1, by keeping Gwen Stacy out of the picture. Gwen's death had as big an impact as Uncle Ben's death on him and his personality. This would be along the same lines of only one of Bruce Waynes parents being murdered, but the other survived, it just doesn't work with the character.

Also, Rami doesn't get Spider-Man's personality. He nails Peter Parker, aside from the fact we don't see him invent anything, but when he puts on the Spider Man costume, he transforms, becomes a different, more confident person. Has anyone ever ready the script treatment for James Camerons Spiderman? He understood it, even had a great scene where Peter first put on the Spider Man mask, when he first made it, in his room, and started acting more confident and quipping lines, and Aunt May knocked on the door, and he yanked the mask off and was back to the meek, docile Peter Parker. THAT'S how Peter/Spidey should be, not pelvic thrusting down New York streets or being mute when fighting supervillians. (Cameron even had in his script Spidey had the organic web shooters, but Peter made mechanical ones to try to cover how he could shoot web to other people) Now, countering what I have said about Cameron, lest I get flamed on this, he had the Peter/MJ deal going from square one as well, no Gwen at all, so his was lacking this as well.

I'd love a reboot, give the series 5 years to cool off, and then restart it with a new director and cast, and start over from square one. Don't make Goblin a Power Ranger, don't make Spidey a mute, and for Pete's sake (no pun intended, or was it?) LEAVE SPIDEY'S MASK ON!!!! With clever lighting, the mask can be just as expressive as a persons face, if not more so. If Rami wants a hero who's face is always shown, have him go direct Green Arrow or something.

Anyways, enough of my rant. Spider-Man 3 (or Peter Parker 2, if you wish) about ruined my faith in Rami's Spidey movies, not because of that movie itself, but the problems and changes Rami has built up in his 3 films. 3 was bad, there is no way around it, it had the potential to be a good one, and I myself sat through the first 80 percent of the movie and thought it was awesome, but then they got to the final act, and it was like Rami though, Crap, I got here, but I have no idea how to end this movie. The ending felt disjointed and thrown together (I know Venom was thrown in there, but still) and I remember one review that has stuck with me, in SM1 and SM2, even though we knew it wasn't going to happen, you still felt like there was a chance that the villian would win. You never felt that in SM3, they got close when Venom was beating the mess out of Peter, but that was only about 5 seconds long before Pete caged Venom and then blew him up. But still, there were problems in all 3 of Rami's films, and when you look at his body of work, and where he is "rumored" to be wanting to go with the series if he stays, I'm not excited about SM4 at all, and I was looking forward to SM3 from the moment the final credits rolled to 2.

But these are just my own, personal opinions. Flame away, if need be.

I respect your opinion, but Gwen in Spider-Man 1 would've been terrible. You can't have Spider-Man lose TWO people in one movie; when you throw in the death of Norman, that's too many major character deaths in one movie...it becomes to dark.

Now if they'd known they were doing more than 3 movies, Gwen would be fine; but you can't stick two love interests in a trilogy and make people care about either one of them.
 
thank you, I'm glad I didn't get burned in effigy on that one.

And your right, I hadn't thought about the impact of two people dying in Spider-Man 1. To make a counter argument though, who says the events of SM1 had to be the same in a re-boot. Make Peter fall for Gwen in SM1, and I mean actually fall HARD, with her falling just as hard for him, and have Pete actually battle whichever villian you put in it WITHOUT having to defend Gwen, just the villian vs Spiderman with the world hanging in the balance. Then, in SM2, really build up the love Pete and Gwen have, because most people who follow the who comics line feel that Gwen was his true soul mate, and at the end have Gobby and the death of Gwen. That would really throw the audience off balance, and make it more impactful, it would also really give the actor who is Spider-Man a chance to shine, plus it would really drive home the motivations as to why Peter doesn't let anyone get close to him again until Mary Jane, and she had to really fight to get in there. Finally, it would also help in future sequals, because non-comic fans would feel like everyone and anyone is fair game.

Then, in SM3, we get introduced to MJ, but while there might be an attraction between both of them, there is no relationship in that movie, just some teasing "maybe" moments, and near the end, there are signs that MJ's getting to him, then is SM4, the walls come down ala SM2's ending.

As far as two love interest in the series, I think it could be done, if handled correctly. If they made MJ someone who was very classy, very strong, charasmatic and beautiful, I think it would be entirley possible to have the audience care for her. And if it shows that she is making Peter Parker happy at times, the audience will think, "Good for him, after all he has been through, he needs this." It could be done, but add so much depth to the relationship and any conflicts with villians, just based on what happened to Gwen in SM2.

Villians and thoughts in this kind of series:

Spider-Man

Electro is the villian, and it would be some mixture of how James Cameron had Electro written, and a new version. As far as origins, we've been there before, so not 1/2 the picture ala SM1 or Batman Begins. A quick jump around the block to setup the world we want the audience in, set up the main characters, especially the relationship between Parker and Uncle Ben, and the beginnings of the attraction between the beautiful and smart Gwen Stacy and the nerdy and quiet Peter Parker. This relationship would REALLY deepen over the course of the film. We would also get great sequences that show Peter Parker's genuis, and the difference in his personality and attitude when he is Spider-Man versus when hes out of the suit, like the afore mention Aunt May sequence. An epic battle would follow at the end of the film, with Spidey never being able to touch the ground (and no saving Gwen or anything else in sight) just a pure, true battle between good versus evil, the winner gets the right to survive. Of course, Spidey wins, and everything seems all well and good, until at the end of the film, it is reported that there has been an accident at Oscorp, and that Norman Osborne, CEO and head of the company, is not expect to survive. This is shown as a news narrative that interupts a touching moment between Peter and Gwen, and Pete has to make some sorry excuse about having to go there and get pictures. Seconds later, Spider-Man flashes over Gwens head, in a final swing sequence, on his way to Oscorp to help whoever he can. A small, slight smile is seen on Gwens face just before the camera fades out. Does she know who Spidey is?

Spider-Man 2-

Direct sequel to SM1- Green Goblin is the villian, Gwen dies. Its a straightforward story that continues on the same themes and characters that were setup in SM1. Peter and Gwens relationship really, really deepens, we continue to get the feeling that Gwen may in fact know who Peter really is, Norman goes insane and becomes Goblin. He is transfixed on Spider-Man because Spider-Man saved him from the disaster at Oscorp, instead of letting him die (or something like that, work with me, I'm brainstorming here.) Along the course of the film, he finds out who Parker really is, and there we go. Since this is just ideas being typed out, I'm not going to go in-depth as to how this movie could be made different from Spider-Man 1 to avoid the been there, done that problem, but I have some ideas.

We do get the dropping Gwen sequence from the comics and the movie (except without MJ), and it will be some combination of Spider-Man being too late or when he shoots his webline out he stops her too quick, or something, but one way or the other, Gwen dies in his arms. At the end, she does reveal that she really knew who Peter Parker was by trying to pull of his mask with the last of her strength, and dies before she can see his face one last time, but not before whispering "I love you Peter." We really, really see Spider-Man/Peter Parkers pain after this. He takes off after the Goblin, fire in his eyes. He takes the beating of his life, but gives as good as he gets, and just wont' stop coming. In the end he either kills Goblin, or does something that leads to his death (ala the glider, as in the comics.) Also, no noble Osborn in this one either, this guys is going to be one sick SOB, ala the Joker (just as he is in the comics). The death of Gwen will be exactly what he set up to happen. He is going to be truly evil, someone the audience will be rooting against at the end of the film, instead of feeling sorry for.

At the very end, at Gwens funeral, we are introduced to Mary Jane Watson for the first time. This helps lighten the darkness that has fallen over the end of the film, and gives the audience (and somewhere in the back of his mind, Peter Parker too) a glimmer of hope.

Spider-Man 3-

Several years later, 3-5 years in Peter Parkers world, after SM2. Peter is a accomplished college professor, though still battling his inner darkenss and bitterness after the death of Gwen. This, along with several other things, is the perfect backdrop for the symbiont story.

Parts of this would be key in Peters journey toward healing, or the black abyss. Mary Jane would also make some very light advances in this film, but she respects the pain that Peter still has from the death of Gwen, so she tries to remain a supportive, carring friend and not let her feelings, which have develped the last several years and continue to develop throughout the course of the film, get in the way. By the end of the film, though, it would become clear that Peter does in fact appreciate what MJ has been doing for him, and is developing feelings toward her as well, but we don't see a resolution of any sorts in this movie, just a prelude of things to come.

Peter would battle an enraged Harry Osborn in this one, where Harry has gone insane due to exposure to some of his father chemicals, and is infact either Green Goblin 2 or Hobgoblin. This would resonate with need for revenge explored in SM1 with the thug and Uncle Ben and SM2, with the death of Norman Osborn. This time, its Peter still coming to grips with what happened that last night against the Goblin, sometimes waking up in a cold sweat in the dead of night, and Harry who is out for pure revenge, no if, ands or buts.

The battle with Harry, however, would not be the main focal point of the film, to help avoid the been there, done that feeling from having just fought the Green Goblin in SM2. Instead, it would be used as a tool to show just how the symbiont is changing Peter, bring out his more violent side. He would, in the end, beat the living crap out of a defenseless Harry, while preparing to deliver a killing blow, pulling off the mask to see that it is his friend. The shock would break through the cloud the symbiont had formed on his mind, and he would realize he was in danger of becoming exactly what Harry and his father were. The guilt and realization of just what he was turning into would drive him to remove the symbiont. The ending to this movie would be the ending we were all hoping for in SM3, with an Eddie Brock/Peter Parker storyline also going on.

Again, if handled right, this could be done in a very powerful and dramatic way, and not over stuff the film. Hobgoblin/Spiderman arc would help show just how Spider-Man is changing with the symbiont, and the Eddie Brock storyline would show just how Peter is changing with the symbiont. It would all be brought to a head in the final battle between Spider-Man and Green Goblin2/Hobgoblin that shocks Peter into realizing whats really happening.

At the very end, Peter drives the symbiont off in the church, and it gets on Brock. The last shot we see the transformation, and the birth of Venom. Then the end of the movie, setting up a must see Spider-Man 4 that will end this story arc. One possible exception to that finish would be a final swing sequence at the end of the movie, and just as Spider-Man is swinging off to do another good deed, from the side of the frame comes Venom, and he rushes the camera and the screen goes dark. Either way, Venom is the last thing you see.

Spider-Man 4

Direct sequal to SM3, where Peter is still wrestling with his feelings for MJ, the after effects of just getting free of the symbiont and what it nearly made him, and Venom. This movie would just be the battle between Venom and Spider-Man. Venom is a very complex character, when you dive down to it, as he is a mirror for Peter Parker/Spider-Man. (he just has enough depth to be a one shot character, but if done right, ohhhh what a shot it would be) This would need to be played on.

Combine that Venom is Spider-Man's mirror, and he knows everything about him, will give Spider-Man his ultimate threat in the 4 movies. 2/3rds of the movie would have sporatic battles with Venom, especially a really neat scene when Venom reveals himself to Spider-Man, and also have Eddie Brock/ Venom messing with Spider-Man's head, ala the great sequences in the 90's Spider-Man cartoon, with Eddie Brock showing up at Aunt Mays house, or on a date between Peter and MJ, ect. You could really play on Peter's fears as they grow, and he begins to imagine he is seeing Venom everywhere and begins to think this might be a villian I can't beat.

Finally, at the end, MJ is put into danger and Peter realizes how important she is to him, and that he can't live without her, period. He needs her in his life, and she reveals that, at least for a short time, she has known he was Spider-Man and was willing to take the risk that came along with being with him. (ala the afore mentioned similar to SM2 ending) Venom is beaten in a last ditch effort by Spider-Man, and throughout the course of the movie we use Venom as Peters mirror, and the grounding Mary Jane is giving him, as the lifeline that eventually saves Peter from the black abyss, and saves him.

The arc would end with the end all be all of Final Swings, showing, one and for all, Spider-Man is back.

I don't think I'd come back for a SM5, I'd be burned out by this point. :)

Anyways, that would be my outline for a Spider-Man reboot. Writing all that was fun, I think I might do some rough story of some of that sometime. :)

The problem with going this route is that the series takes, as you say, a darker, more mature route that soccer moms and little kids may not want to see over and over again. The trick is finding a balance, don't make Spidey brood like Batman, and don't make him cry like a sissy, you just have to find a middle ground, a balance that works. It could be done with the right director, actors and writers, and I think that Spider-Man, heading along this route, would be as big, if not a bigger hit, than the Spider-Man franshise his already today.

Wow, didn't mean for it to be that long. :wow: Just started typing and things kept coming.
Anyways, as said earlier, thats my own opinions. Flame away if need be. :hyper:
 
If I were to reboot, and this isn't to say I want a reboot; I love Raimi's..first two movies, and Spider-Man 3 wasn't enough of mistake to ruin the series for me (see X-3 for that.)


But if I could direct my own spidey movie chronology it'd go:


Spider-Man 1:

Spidey's age: 17
Villain: Doctor Octopus, Norman Osborne
Love interest: Gwen
Synopsis: Spider-Man 1's origins story with Spider-Man 2's action. Replace Norman for Harry.

Spider-Man 2:

Spidey's Age: 19
Villain: Green Goblin
Love interest: Gwen
Synopsis: Basically a death of the Stacey's arc. Death of The GG as well.


Spider-Man 3:

Spidey's Age: 22
Villains: Green Goblin 2, Sandman, Electro
Love Interests: Felicia & MJ.
Synopsis: Peter's had 3 years to cope with the loss of Gwen, and he's trying to find new meaning in his life. Black Cat becomes Peter's side kick and love interest, but in the end he winds up with Mary Jane.

Harry dies protecting MJ and Peter from the Sandman; kind of like Spidey 3 but less crowded.

Sandman and Electro are part of organized crime, Sandman gets his powers by accident, Electro on purpose. They team up from the beginning. They know each other before their transformations.

Electro turns Sandman into glass, and Electro is seemingly killed when Spider-Man tricks him into destroying a water tower, which collapses on Electro.

Spider-Man 4:

Spidey's Age: 24
Love interest: Mary Jane
Villains: Lizard + Kraven

Synopsis: Kraven's Last Hunt w/ the Lizard sitting in for Vermin+ elements of Spider-Man 2's love problems. Chameleon and Kraven also has a side story. In the end the abused younger brother, kills his older brother, then lures spidey to the bridge where Gwen died, and jumps, but Spider Man snags him with the webbing saving his life (feeling some vindication for his previous loss of Gwen.)

Spider-Man 5:

Spidey's Age: 27
Love Interest: Mary Jane
Villain: Venom
Synopsis: Symbiote Story.

Spider-Man 6:

Spidey's Age: 30
Wife: Mary Jane Parker
Villains: Sinister Six (Doctor Octopus, Sandman, Electro, Venom, Hobgoblin, The Vulture.)

Spider-Man 7:

Spidey's Age: 32
Wife: A pregnant MJ Parker
Villains: Venom, Carnage
Synopsis: Maximum Carnage. MJ loses the baby.


Spider-Man 8:

Spidey's age: 35
Wife: MJ
Villain: The Jackal
Synopsis: Warren Miles reintroduces Gwen Stacy into Peter's life to screw with his head. Basically follows the 1970s comic story.

Spider-Man 9:

Spidey's age: 37
wife: MJ
Villains: The Kingpin, The Owl, The Silvermane, Hammerhead, Maybe a slightly less corny version of the Enforcers (basically a big mafia film.)
Synopsis: Sort of like Back in Black but without the Punisher Spidey. Fisk's men shoot May Parker on accident, and Spidey tracks them down, and winds up in a big mafia battle.

at the end, MJ finally gives birth to baby May, and they live happily ever after. The End.
 
Agreed. Since Begins, filmmakers can't even so much as make a slight error in a series before the fanboys start whining for a restart. :whatever:

uh. Are you saying Batman & Robin was a slight error? More like a monumentous error. Batman Begins brought some much needed dignity back to the Caped Crusader.

Anyway, I vote reboot. I lost faith in Raimi as soon as I saw the Green Goblin. I think Spiderman can be done MUCH better.

-fin
 
uh. Are you saying Batman & Robin was a slight error? More like a monumentous error. Batman Begins brought some much needed dignity back to the Caped Crusader.

Anyway, I vote reboot. I lost faith in Raimi as soon as I saw the Green Goblin. I think Spiderman can be done MUCH better.

-fin

That's not what he's saying. What he means is that since Begins has went the "reboot" route, it's all people want to see now if a comic book film has even the smallest flaw. Right now Spider-Man is still going very strong, it's nothing like Batman & Robin, which was a commercial failure and critical bomb. A series will not get a reboot unless the previous work is an atrocity. People thinking they will reboot the series right now are kidding themselves. Screwing over Venom and make one sub-par film is not enough of an incentive to reboot an entire franchise and start from scratch.
 
That's not what he's saying. What he means is that since Begins has went the "reboot" route, it's all people want to see now if a comic book film has even the smallest flaw. Right now Spider-Man is still going very strong, it's nothing like Batman & Robin, which was a commercial failure and critical bomb. A series will not get a reboot unless the previous work is an atrocity. People thinking they will reboot the series right now are kidding themselves. Screwing over Venom and make one sub-par film is not enough of an incentive to reboot an entire franchise and start from scratch.

Ok I see. Thanks for clearing that up.

In terms of Spiderman I guess its just a matter of opinion. I think Raimi screwed over the Green Goblin to begin with. Spiderman 2 did somewhat redeem the series for me, but only momentarily.
 
Do the forth film with Lizard and the marriage. Then wrap it up. "This is a story about a girl. That girl. Mary Jane Watson."

Years later 'reboot' it in the way that Hulk is being rebooted, albiet for a different reason... years have passed, Peter Parker is still married to Mary Jane, he has become a science teacher and is still fighting crime as Spider-Man.

peter_parker_spiderman.jpg


This will allow the creative team a break, since I don't think they want to be working in this universe for alot of their career. And help bring in new creative teams and a cast for a reboot that continues the films prior to it with a new and fresh take as well.

By the time the 4th movie comes around, there will be no other significant places for Peter's journey to go. He'll be the man in and behind the mask. If things are mixed up and blended, it could get repetitive after a while with no real progression. However, with a new creative team and a reboot/sequel trilogy there will be new areas to explore and a new world to inhabit. There is no reason for a real reboot, but more of a Batman Returns to Batman Forever type reboot- switch up the cast, mix things up and start anew with the audience remembering the backstory from the old. Or how Superman Returns is a sequel of Superman II, in some aspects. This is the kind of sequel trilogy that should take place after the forth film- a sequel/reboot. Not because the cast and crew isn't working or delivering, rather to keep it new and fresh.

I agree with this.

It wouldn't necessarily be a "reboot" in the terms of Bond, Hulk, and Batman. It would be along the lines of Superman. About five years after Spider-man 4 bring on Spider-man 5 with a new cast and creative team. Use movies 1-4 as cannon and develop a story from there making references to the past films. It wouldn't have to be a re-introduction or a re-invention of the franchise, just a freshness and a new story arc.

-R
 
Same continuity. Even though Spidey 3 blew, the Spider-Man series is still king when it comes to how to make a damn fine comic series.
 
Same continuity...I don't understand how anyone can even consider a reboot.
 
There should be a continuation at least through Spider-Man 6. Maybe in 20-30 years in the future they can reboot the franchise. Now it's just unecessary.
 
If I were to reboot, and this isn't to say I want a reboot; I love Raimi's..first two movies, and Spider-Man 3 wasn't enough of mistake to ruin the series for me (see X-3 for that.)


But if I could direct my own spidey movie chronology it'd go:


Spider-Man 1:

Spidey's age: 17
Villain: Doctor Octopus, Norman Osborne
Love interest: Gwen
Synopsis: Spider-Man 1's origins story with Spider-Man 2's action. Replace Norman for Harry.

Spider-Man 2:

Spidey's Age: 19
Villain: Green Goblin
Love interest: Gwen
Synopsis: Basically a death of the Stacey's arc. Death of The GG as well.


Spider-Man 3:

Spidey's Age: 22
Villains: Green Goblin 2, Sandman, Electro
Love Interests: Felicia & MJ.
Synopsis: Peter's had 3 years to cope with the loss of Gwen, and he's trying to find new meaning in his life. Black Cat becomes Peter's side kick and love interest, but in the end he winds up with Mary Jane.

Harry dies protecting MJ and Peter from the Sandman; kind of like Spidey 3 but less crowded.

Sandman and Electro are part of organized crime, Sandman gets his powers by accident, Electro on purpose. They team up from the beginning. They know each other before their transformations.

Electro turns Sandman into glass, and Electro is seemingly killed when Spider-Man tricks him into destroying a water tower, which collapses on Electro.

Spider-Man 4:

Spidey's Age: 24
Love interest: Mary Jane
Villains: Lizard + Kraven

Synopsis: Kraven's Last Hunt w/ the Lizard sitting in for Vermin+ elements of Spider-Man 2's love problems. Chameleon and Kraven also has a side story. In the end the abused younger brother, kills his older brother, then lures spidey to the bridge where Gwen died, and jumps, but Spider Man snags him with the webbing saving his life (feeling some vindication for his previous loss of Gwen.)

Spider-Man 5:

Spidey's Age: 27
Love Interest: Mary Jane
Villain: Venom
Synopsis: Symbiote Story.

Spider-Man 6:

Spidey's Age: 30
Wife: Mary Jane Parker
Villains: Sinister Six (Doctor Octopus, Sandman, Electro, Venom, Hobgoblin, The Vulture.)

Spider-Man 7:

Spidey's Age: 32
Wife: A pregnant MJ Parker
Villains: Venom, Carnage
Synopsis: Maximum Carnage. MJ loses the baby.


Spider-Man 8:

Spidey's age: 35
Wife: MJ
Villain: The Jackal
Synopsis: Warren Miles reintroduces Gwen Stacy into Peter's life to screw with his head. Basically follows the 1970s comic story.

Spider-Man 9:

Spidey's age: 37
wife: MJ
Villains: The Kingpin, The Owl, The Silvermane, Hammerhead, Maybe a slightly less corny version of the Enforcers (basically a big mafia film.)
Synopsis: Sort of like Back in Black but without the Punisher Spidey. Fisk's men shoot May Parker on accident, and Spidey tracks them down, and winds up in a big mafia battle.

at the end, MJ finally gives birth to baby May, and they live happily ever after. The End.


A) I am pissed my thread was shut down but oh well...sorry boys, didn't realize there was a similar thread.
B) Raised webbing...sigh...no, that is not why I wanted a reboot. Yes, the acting was great. Yes, the special effects were, well...special. Could things have been changed, sure. Was Willem Dafoe perfect as both Osborn and the Goblin, of course. Was the Goblin costume good, I would say no. Why, because it was too much of a departure. Modification I can see but a total change is weak sauce and they could have made a better effort. I have always thought and maintained that point of view as do others. My point, and I was just REFERENCING raised webbing as ONE observation is that there were details, things that were done that put up a...mental block for me that never quite made me see what was on screen as the Spidey I grew up with. Lack of use of his spider-sense, the fixing and sewing of his costume, running out of webbing in the middle of a free fall (and I am not talking power failure in SM2), and most...most importantly...his sense of humor. It was not portrayed nearly as well as it could have been. Spidey's sense of humor is more Van Wilder and we oftentimes got Van Helsing. But before you start bashing me and throwing gamma iradiated veggies at me, if you read what I am saying, I am not bashing...it is just personal observation. I loved the original three and I think SM2 is right up there as one of the best sequels right behind Empire.
C) And come on...does anyone here really think there will be (let me scroll up again and look) NINE sequels with FOUR main villains AND the Enforcers?? SM3 was crampped enough and did terrible justice to two of Spidey's most classic villians. If SM9 was that crampped, it would need to be nine hours long.
 
Where's the option for "don't make anymore" ?

You're going to have to build yourself a spaceship and find the nearest black hole if you want to get away from any more Spidey movies happening.
 
You're going to have to build yourself a spaceship and find the nearest black hole if you want to get away from any more Spidey movies happening.

I'm working on the warp drive now....:cwink:
 
A reboot for a series that not even 7 years old and worth 2.4 Billion bucks. You've got to be kidding. A reboot is out of the question in the eyes of Marvel/Sony. Even with a new cast, they're going to follow the three films' continuity. They like those billions, and Marvel/Sony can care less about disgruntled fanboys.
 
something I suggested right after spiderman 2 was if they do recast they should keep it in the same continuity, and have someone like alex ross draw an opening sequence similar to the one he did for 2 that showed the new actors going through the events in the previous stories, sort of to show the audience this is the same series just new actors so to speak.

But that was before spiderman 3, I walked out dissappointed, I don't read near the comics I used to, but something about 3 felt wrong to me, It just didn't work for me. I mean its a ok movie but not an ok comic book movie IMO.

I am a fan of raimi's work have the evil dead series on dvd, but this 3rd spiderman just seemed forced, just wasn't as good as the 2nd one.

I wouldn't mind seeing a reboot in about 8 or 9 years, you know give people a breather like a previous poster said, but if they do keep it in the same cannon recast and do the artwork thing, because I am bored with maguire and dunst both.
 
That's not what he's saying. What he means is that since Begins has went the "reboot" route, it's all people want to see now if a comic book film has even the smallest flaw. Right now Spider-Man is still going very strong, it's nothing like Batman & Robin, which was a commercial failure and critical bomb. A series will not get a reboot unless the previous work is an atrocity. People thinking they will reboot the series right now are kidding themselves. Screwing over Venom and make one sub-par film is not enough of an incentive to reboot an entire franchise and start from scratch.

It is for all the fanboys who think that teh Venom11 1$ t3h 0nly Gr3@t Spydur M@N v111a1n.
 
i think we should do a continuity, maybe in 10 years we can do a reboot
 
im all for continuity , they really messed up the venom thing in my eyes but i think it can be fixed . i doubt there will be six sam raimi spidermans . six seems far fetched to me
 
They should stop making Spiderman Movies for at least 4-5 years and then coming back with a new cast and crew.
 
I think the best way to get a new cast in is to barely refrence the first three but continue from where SM3 left off. This includes a new opening credits style and theme (I mean Elfman already left anyway). Showing the first 3 movies recapped with new actors faces though is a bad idea. May confuse (aka piss off) general audiences. I'd avoid that.

Of course this is starting to sound like the transistion from Burton to Schumaucher. Another reason not to recast just yet...
 
Same continuity from the previous movies,but i have a feeling that if the actors change..that is what will kill the franchise.
 
I think the best way to get a new cast in is to barely refrence the first three but continue from where SM3 left off. This includes a new opening credits style and theme (I mean Elfman already left anyway). Showing the first 3 movies recapped with new actors faces though is a bad idea. May confuse (aka piss off) general audiences. I'd avoid that.

Of course this is starting to sound like the transistion from Burton to Schumaucher. Another reason not to recast just yet...

I actually like the idea of trying to get across to the audience that this is the same story and the same characters that they have been seeing for years. I loved it when the James Bond franchise did a similar thing with OHMSS with the clocks winding backwards and showing Bond's previous adventures to drive the point home that George Lazenby was playing the same James Bond that Sean Connery did.
 
i think it needs to be rebooted. start over and in the first movie have it still be the green goblin, but introduce the stacy's and eddie brock to minor roles. then in the second introduce john jameson and by the end of the second have him returning from space with the symbiote and in the second have peter struggle between mj and gwen while fighting scorpion, due to jjj, then in the third have him fight venom, but let venom live for a fourth one and also have him fight lizard. i know these ideas could use some beefing up and i'll get around to it later.
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"