Comics Sensational Spider-Man #26 Preview

Captivated said:
I never said they weren't talented... they are.

So was Picasso... but I don't him drawing Spider-Man either! Let me be more visual for those with limited art history...

Wow, it could be MJ and Peter!

K57U9ZGZPL_23OIJW6.jpg


Picasso, "Friendship."

I know that you never said it. I was just saying that I appreciate their talent so that, if this turns into a heated debate and someone says that I said he "sucked", I could come back to it.

Also, I like Picasso as well, and I would buy a Spidey book by him....if the story was worth a damn....which Sensational's story is right now, which is why I will continue to buy it. I'm just glad that Sensational hasn't resorted to "life-changing" arcs yet. It's almost 4 issues into this arc, too! FNSM didn't even make it 2 issues before it became a "life-altering arc"!
 
shinlyle said:
I know that you never said it. I was just saying that I appreciate their talent so that, if this turns into a heated debate and someone says that I said he "sucked", I could come back to it.
I really wasn't referring to your comment, which did seem more balanced... at least more than the rabid, weird art lover, Dangerous.

Also, I like Picasso as well, and I would buy a Spidey book by him....
:eek: Seriously!?? Well, you just blew my example... I don't LIKE Picasso at all, I just appreciate that he is talented. It was just an extreme example, but I should have said, "someone like Picasso" (*cough* Pat Lee *cough*).

In reality, I guess I would buy a book by Picasso too, but ONLY because of his FAME, not because I like his art.
 
Captivated said:
I really wasn't referring to your comment, which did seem more balanced... at least more than the rabid, weird art lover, Dangerous.

:eek: Seriously!?? Well, you just blew my example... I don't LIKE Picasso at all, I just appreciate that he is talented. It was just an extreme example, but I should have said, "someone like Picasso" (*cough* Pat Lee *cough*).

In reality, I guess I would buy a book by Picasso too, but ONLY because of his FAME, not because I like his art.


I prefer the more naturalistic style myself, but some abstart art grabs me. Picasso is one of them. He had a great eye for composition and he knew how to use colors and lines to emphasize the mood of the piece.

Had you said "Pat Lee", I think everyone would be in agreement. I don't know of anyone who likes his artwork.....not even Pat Lee.
 
If you actually study Picasso, you'd know he was a very talented artist. His realism is impressive, cubism was just a different approach for him. So yeah, I'd buy a spidey book by him too.
pic073c.jpg


Plus using an artist who centered around abstraction doesn't help the arguement. Realist vs. realist is a differnt story. As far as whether or not you prefer Medina's art, it's all a matter of opinion...art is in the eye of the beholder.
 
shinlyle said:
I have a few qualms with Medina's artwork, mainly his women, but, aside from that, I love his work. He has a very McFarlane-ish look to his work that I can't help but love.

All things being equal, I'd still rather have Clayton Crane, though. That man does some amazing art! His work on the Ghost Rider mini as well as the Venom Vs. Carnage mini, was awesome.

As fro Ramos....I like Ramos about 6-8 years ago. Over the last few years, his style has become too graffiti-influenced for my liking. I will admit that he has a very kinetic style, but I just can't get over some aspects of his artwork. His Aunt May was horrible, he draws hands with nub fingers.....little things.

As an artist, I respect Ramos a great deal, I just don't dig that particular style. Him, Skottie Young....just not my thing.

Agreed :up:
 
I'm excited about the return of Stegron :up:

He was one of my favorites back in the 70's.

:)
 
Themanofbat said:
I'm excited about the return of Stegron :up:

He was one of my favorites back in the 70's.

:)

I am too.. I was totally shocked when I read the ending of 26, I would have never guessed he would show up. Good to see he wasn't entirely forgotten. :up:
 
Captivated said:
10 to 1 my understanding and knowledge of art could run circles around yours. But in the end, you like what you like.

You seem very sure of yourself sir.

Never assume anything about the person opposite,
I think we would all do well to subscribe to that.
I myself have done 9 years of art college from 1996-2005 culminating w/ a four year degree in Illustration, a large portion of which was art history/theory based.
So for you to say ‘my understanding and knowledge of art could run circles around yours’
I find laughable to say the least.

Here's a tip- Get over yourself.

You are not the only one around here who knows more than a dime about art outside of comics.

Personally I feel it is the more cutting edge artists who by incorporating new styles into the comicbook keep it fresh and vitally, continue the evolution of the medium.
That is after all what the true significance of a real artist is,- to strive to make people think about something different or to look at things in a new way.
To reinvent the wheel.

Captivated said:
Please translate using proper English...
"spikey-ist artists on Spidey is the noughties" :confused:

'spikey-ist' = spikey,
'noughties' = the decade we exist in now, and which succeeds the nineties.
 
Anyway, SSM#26 was great.
Bet no one saw Stegron coming huh, that was really cool to resurrect his character.
I thought Crain would wrap this thing up but it's good to see Medina is back on for #27.
Apart from the crap costume I reckon everything else about this book is hot.
I just hope we get to see Medina staying on till the red and blue’s come back.
 
Man, i am LOVING this arc!

I just about fell out of my chair when i saw Stegron at the end! I hope to see another Stegron/Lizard throwdown.

Sacasa rules the Spidey books right now, imo. Anyone know how to get in touch with him?
 
I marked out like a six year old girl when I saw Stegron at the end of SSM 26. In the Cameleon team thread I was hoping for him to show up as one of Spidey's "deadly foes" but this is like five times better.

Thank you Sarcasa, you are owning the Spider titles right now :up:
 
Sacasa rocks, JMS, Joe Q, and even PAD need to take a lesson from him. His arcs don't overhype themselves and yet Sensational is the best 616 spidey right now, he can *surprise surprise* write a decent Pete/MJ realationship, and his mastermind behind everything isn't green goblin. Now watch Marvel f*** this up and have him ditched for Hudlin or something. :mad:
 
I'll weigh in late with my thoughts on SenSM #26 -- I liked it! I'm glad to see Stegron back too, since he was a '70s classic despite being a Lizard-ripoff.

The art was spooky, moody and realistic enough to make me wish that Crane had drawn this arc from the beginning. My only complaints are the four fingers on Lizzy's hands (anatomical note to future Marvel artists - Lizards have 5 fingers on each hand and 5 toes on each foot just like humans), and the "memory" scene where the Lizard has a flashback to being with Billy as Curt Connors ... and having two arms in the flashback! Since Billy was a very little kid way back in ASM #6, the assumption has always been that Connors lost his right arm in battle before Billy was born. Another one the editors should have caught, but not a really big deal.

I really wanted to see Lizard get another shot at Black Cat before the end of this arc, but with Stegron popping up, I doubt that will happen now.

BTW - what kind of last name is "Stegron" anyway? I'll bet Vincent Stegron thought it was quite a coincidence when he not only turned into a dinosaur-man, but a Stegosaurus-man! ;)
 
Dangerous said:
You seem very sure of yourself sir.

Never assume anything about the person opposite,
I think we would all do well to subscribe to that.
I myself have done 9 years of art college from 1996-2005 culminating w/ a four year degree in Illustration, a large portion of which was art history/theory based.
So for you to say ‘my understanding and knowledge of art could run circles around yours’
I find laughable to say the least.
My statement was not absolute, it was about odds… I'm older than you. I have a Bachelor of Fine Arts (BFA) from a University, specializing in illustration, with a minor in art history. After graduating I went straight into the field of art/design and, let's just say, I've racked up more than 10 years of full time working experience.

Here's a tip- Get over yourself.

You are not the only one around here who knows more than a dime about art outside of comics.
What a unbelievable hypocrite you are! Have you completely forgotten the statement you made that prompted my comment? You said "You guys would'nt know cool pencils if they bit you on the ass. Both Medina and Ramos are some of the spikey-ist artists on Spidey is the noughties." Bad grammar aside, it sure seems like you can dish, but not take.

You have consistently proved that you are INCAPABLE of letting someone criticize art you like or express an opposing opinion without argument and snide commentary. It gets really TEDIOUS. Take some of your own advice why don’t you.

Personally I feel it is the more cutting edge artists who by incorporating new styles into the comic book keep it fresh and vitally, continue the evolution of the medium.
That is after all what the true significance of a real artist is,- to strive to make people think about something different or to look at things in a new way.
To reinvent the wheel.
Yeah… true… but all too often “artists” will use that line to try to justify pure-D crap.
 
That preview looks great!

Yeah, the arrival of Stegron is somethign I did not see coming. This has proven to be the most enjoyable Spidey arc sicne the "Hyrda" arc in ASM.
 
spideylover89 said:
Sacasa rocks, JMS, Joe Q, and even PAD need to take a lesson from him. His arcs don't overhype themselves and yet Sensational is the best 616 spidey right now, he can *surprise surprise* write a decent Pete/MJ realationship, and his mastermind behind everything isn't green goblin. Now watch Marvel f*** this up and have him ditched for Hudlin or something. :mad:

Heh, beat me to it.

This arc is great, loving every aspect about it. FINALLY!!!!!! A good Spidey book, that grown ups can enjoy! The tone and feel reminds me of Spidey books in the late 80's, and the artwork reminds me of the McFarlane days! Back when Spidey ALWAYS had the best artists in the world. Oh this is good
 
Captivated said:
Yeah… true… but all too often “artists” will use that line to try to justify pure-D crap.

Look, I don't want to jump in on your argument, but I can't help but say something after a line like that

Being a big Ramos fan, I can easily see Dangerous' side. You see, there's nothing wrong with saying, 'its not my thing.' Shinlyle made a really good example of saying a point without insulting an entire art form or people's tastes.

I'm not saying that you went over the top, or you're a major a-hole, all I'm saying is that when a lot of people talk about Ramos, they'll use comments like the one used above. While we can like the art, as well as most other ones that mainstream people like, we're made to feel like we don't know what we're talking about by people whose tastes lie on the more mainstream side.

While I actually can't defend him by jumping the gun on you, (I actually felt his comment was more in jest, thus the 'spikey' phrasing,) I can understand his point. When people discuss art on these forums, it does tend to be fairly mature. But when graff style art comes into play, there's a complete loss of respect. We're made to feel stupid.

My company which I direct works with a lot of graff artists, who came out of fine art educations. Yet, there's still this stigma. We were actually in newspapers for our support of graff art. My live in girlfriends brother gave up his art career 'cause he got fed up with people's views about his 'unique,' (basically graff, urban, cutting edge,) style of art when he was in University. My girlfirend still gets upset when she thinks about it.

There's a stigma that comics are made for kids, or weirdo's, or people who have no life. Well, a lot of people into comic make us feel like we're un educated morons for liking this style of art.

I know I've totally gone on, but I'm just trying to make you understand why some of us just get fed up and just make a nasty comment back. What makes it worse, people who like artists like Ramos tend to just leave these forums, and go talk art on hip hop forums, (which is CRAP trying to talk art with some of those people,) so we don't have many people on our side here. Yet, lots of people will always buy these comics with 'graff,' style art. Meaning, the haters will still hate, and a group of us here will always get it from every angle
 
wolvie2020 said:
Heh, beat me to it.

This arc is great, loving every aspect about it. FINALLY!!!!!! A good Spidey book, that grown ups can enjoy! The tone and feel reminds me of Spidey books in the late 80's, and the artwork reminds me of the McFarlane days! Back when Spidey ALWAYS had the best artists in the world. Oh this is good

I know...remember when ASM had Larsen, and Spider-Man had McFarlane? Whatever happened to Marvel hiring the best talent for their flagship character?

Why aren't following artists working on Spidey:

1) Hitch (yeah, he works slow, but he's the best out there, IMHO)
2) McNiven
3) Deodato (he got big on ASm, so they put him on New Avengers? BOO!!!)
4) McGuinness (He's now a Marvel exclusive, so you never know...)
5) Cassady (It would be....beautiful)
6) Bolland (Awesome artist....although he rarely does anything other than covers nowadays)
7) JR JR (love him or hate him, he's a great artist in my book)
8 ) The Dodsons (why doesn't Marvel throw them a Spidey book!?!Too late now....DC snatched them up...)

Anyways....those are just some examples. It's just a shame that, when ASm gets a new artist to replace Deodato, the best they can do is Ron Garney. No offense to the man, as he has his merits, but he's not one of the "hot" artists I'd have ever expected to replace Deodato, who was doing a trememdous job on ASM. Just my opinion.

Personally, I think Ron Garney does a far better Hulk...
 
wolvie2020 said:
Look, I don't want to jump in on your argument, but I can't help but say something after a line like that

Being a big Ramos fan, I can easily see Dangerous' side. You see, there's nothing wrong with saying, 'its not my thing.' Shinlyle made a really good example of saying a point without insulting an entire art form or people's tastes.

I'm not saying that you went over the top, or you're a major a-hole, all I'm saying is that when a lot of people talk about Ramos, they'll use comments like the one used above. While we can like the art, as well as most other ones that mainstream people like, we're made to feel like we don't know what we're talking about by people whose tastes lie on the more mainstream side.

While I actually can't defend him by jumping the gun on you, (I actually felt his comment was more in jest, thus the 'spikey' phrasing,) I can understand his point. When people discuss art on these forums, it does tend to be fairly mature. But when graff style art comes into play, there's a complete loss of respect. We're made to feel stupid.

My company which I direct works with a lot of graff artists, who came out of fine art educations. Yet, there's still this stigma. We were actually in newspapers for our support of graff art. My live in girlfriends brother gave up his art career 'cause he got fed up with people's views about his 'unique,' (basically graff, urban, cutting edge,) style of art when he was in University. My girlfirend still gets upset when she thinks about it.

There's a stigma that comics are made for kids, or weirdo's, or people who have no life. Well, a lot of people into comic make us feel like we're un educated morons for liking this style of art.

I know I've totally gone on, but I'm just trying to make you understand why some of us just get fed up and just make a nasty comment back. What makes it worse, people who like artists like Ramos tend to just leave these forums, and go talk art on hip hop forums, (which is CRAP trying to talk art with some of those people,) so we don't have many people on our side here. Yet, lots of people will always buy these comics with 'graff,' style art. Meaning, the haters will still hate, and a group of us here will always get it from every angle


Well put, and as someone who started to have Ramos grow on her I completely agree. So many people forget, art is in the eye of the beholder, you have every right to say it's not your thing or you don't like it, but you have no place to judge it and call it crap or tell someone else their understanding of art is minimal because they like it.

As for Medina, his people need work, but his spidey and villians are amazing. He has flare and I enjoy that much more than a flat Garneyesque style. Also he is very imaginative and he captures the mood of this arc so well, Clayton was also awesome to have on this book...I kind of wish they would just trade off arcs between the two of them.
 
Captivated said:
My statement was not absolute, it was about odds… I'm older than you. I have a Bachelor of Fine Arts (BFA) from a University, specializing in illustration, with a minor in art history. After graduating I went straight into the field of art/design and, let's just say, I've racked up more than 10 years of full time working experience.

How nice for you.
I also have a Bachelor degree in Illustration I only got a 2.2 tho, din really like Uni much. I'm only really interested in comic art you see.
Well for the most part. I finished uni last year and now at 25 I am currently putting together my online portfolio. Which is mostly my Spider-man stuff.
My style is actually quite Romita Sr influenced.

Captivated said:
What a unbelievable hypocrite you are! Have you completely forgotten the statement you made that prompted my comment? You said "You guys would'nt know cool pencils if they bit you on the ass. Both Medina and Ramos are some of the spikey-ist artists on Spidey is the noughties." Bad grammar aside, it sure seems like you can dish, but not take.

Hmm, lets see 'bit' was spelt correctly, as was 'spikey' and also 'noughties', (reffering to the decade we now exist in). So while they were forms of slang, they were at least spelt right.
Maybe if only the Queens english is good enough for you you would be better served not interacting w/ others on a message board?
I was pointing out that Medina is a good artist/great artist for Spidey and maybe your taste swings in the opposite direction but if you don like it, dont buy it. A lot of other people right now are digging SSM.

Captivated said:
You have consistently proved that you are INCAPABLE of letting someone criticize art you like or express an opposing opinion without argument and snide commentary. It gets really TEDIOUS. Take some of your own advice why don’t you.

INCAPABLE huh?, sheesh that sounds serious.
I'm a fanboy what I can I say, I believe in what I say.
If by snide commentary you mean me dissing ...say, Bags because I know the person dissing the artist I like is a fan of Bags then so be it.
I like what I like, and if you are gonna say the artists I like are no good then I am gonna ripp Bags.

Captivated said:
Yeah… true… but all too often “artists” will use that line to try to justify pure-D crap.

True.
However I know crap, and I don't dig any.
 
wolvie2020 said:
Look, I don't want to jump in on your argument, but I can't help but say something after a line like that

Being a big Ramos fan, I can easily see Dangerous' side. You see, there's nothing wrong with saying, 'its not my thing.' Shinlyle made a really good example of saying a point without insulting an entire art form or people's tastes.

I'm not saying that you went over the top, or you're a major a-hole, all I'm saying is that when a lot of people talk about Ramos, they'll use comments like the one used above. While we can like the art, as well as most other ones that mainstream people like, we're made to feel like we don't know what we're talking about by people whose tastes lie on the more mainstream side.

While I actually can't defend him by jumping the gun on you, (I actually felt his comment was more in jest, thus the 'spikey' phrasing,) I can understand his point. When people discuss art on these forums, it does tend to be fairly mature. But when graff style art comes into play, there's a complete loss of respect. We're made to feel stupid.

My company which I direct works with a lot of graff artists, who came out of fine art educations. Yet, there's still this stigma. We were actually in newspapers for our support of graff art. My live in girlfriends brother gave up his art career 'cause he got fed up with people's views about his 'unique,' (basically graff, urban, cutting edge,) style of art when he was in University. My girlfirend still gets upset when she thinks about it.

There's a stigma that comics are made for kids, or weirdo's, or people who have no life. Well, a lot of people into comic make us feel like we're un educated morons for liking this style of art.

I know I've totally gone on, but I'm just trying to make you understand why some of us just get fed up and just make a nasty comment back. What makes it worse, people who like artists like Ramos tend to just leave these forums, and go talk art on hip hop forums, (which is CRAP trying to talk art with some of those people,) so we don't have many people on our side here. Yet, lots of people will always buy these comics with 'graff,' style art. Meaning, the haters will still hate, and a group of us here will always get it from every angle

4real man, my style is much more classically based than anything like Medina or Ramos but I think these guy's pages look insane.
I have nothing but respect for these artists because I think to do what they do is a lot harder and a lot more creative than just trying to draw like Romita Sr or Bagley.
 
Symbiotica said:
Wow, BC and Puma [or whatever his name is] hook up.

Expect kittens in 10 weeks.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...............

Except they don't. :confused:
 
The Lizard said:
I'll weigh in late with my thoughts on SenSM #26 -- I liked it! I'm glad to see Stegron back too, since he was a '70s classic despite being a Lizard-ripoff.

The art was spooky, moody and realistic enough to make me wish that Crane had drawn this arc from the beginning. My only complaints are the four fingers on Lizzy's hands (anatomical note to future Marvel artists - Lizards have 5 fingers on each hand and 5 toes on each foot just like humans), and the "memory" scene where the Lizard has a flashback to being with Billy as Curt Connors ... and having two arms in the flashback! Since Billy was a very little kid way back in ASM #6, the assumption has always been that Connors lost his right arm in battle before Billy was born. Another one the editors should have caught, but not a really big deal.

I really wanted to see Lizard get another shot at Black Cat before the end of this arc, but with Stegron popping up, I doubt that will happen now.

Lol, that Lizard/Black Cat bout really got under your skin didnt it? I shouldnt laugh though; Im STILL peeved over Spidey losing to X-Factor's Strong Guy during the Infinity Crusade mini series...

What did you think of Lizard vs Vermin?
I liked it, myself. True, Vermin appeared to get the drop on Lizard, but Lizzy tossed Vermin away like he was little mmore than a minor annoyance.

Fingers still crossed for a Lizard/Stegron fight.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"