It’s just for the talent to save face and not be publicly embarrassed. There’s no way Zaslav is coming back to this one.
Who else is very sad
It’s apparently not fully done despite these articles burying that lede. It was a scheduling thing. Could possibly hold off until next summer. Reallllly hope this isn’t gone for good.
Oh you mean the best director they’ve had since Nolan? Who is leaps and bounds above anyone in their stable except maybe Matt Reeves? Same with the screenwriter?Not sad at all. Luca Guadagnino was not a good fit for this type of material.
Yeah. This is like saying Scorsese couldn't make Hugo. There is a level of talent where their range is infinite.Oh you mean the best director they’ve had since Nolan? Who is leaps and bounds above anyone in their stable except maybe Matt Reeves? Same with the screenwriter?
Luca is an amazing fit. The idea of him doing something pulpy and fun is killer.
Hopefully they’ll come back to it, but I doubt it. This was transparently the most interesting movie on their docket.
Oh you mean the best director they’ve had since Nolan? Who is leaps and bounds above anyone in their stable except maybe Matt Reeves? Same with the screenwriter?
Luca is an amazing fit. The idea of him doing something pulpy and fun is killer.
Hopefully they’ll come back to it, but I doubt it. This was transparently the most interesting movie on their docket.
Why on Earth would you assume that? It’s not a genre he’s dipped his toes in. That’s why it’s exciting.Yes, and I stand by my hypothesis. Luca Guadagnino doesn't do pulpy and fun action movies. It's not in his wheelhouse.
Why on Earth would you assume that? It’s not a genre he’s dipped his toes in. That’s why it’s exciting.
Cool. Then hopefully he’d just walk. Happy to take that chance! You get great movies with risk.I'd rather not see Luca Guadagnino have to deal with making a studio blockbuster movie where his vision and style could be compromised.
Cool. Then hopefully he’d just walk. Happy to take that chance! You get great movies with risk.
This is a pivot. You said he wasn't a "fit for the material" and are now going with, "but the studio would compromise him".I'd rather not see Luca Guadagnino have to deal with making a studio blockbuster movie where his vision and style could be compromised.
I didn't realize a movie made by a hacky director was the last word on artistic risk.Tell that to Joker: Folie a Deux.
Literally the only way we've gotten great blockbusters. I'm baffled.I didn't realize a movie made by a hacky director was the last word on artistic risk.

Yes, and I stand by my hypothesis. Luca Guadagnino doesn't do pulpy and fun action movies. It's not in his wheelhouse.
I didn't realize a movie made by a hacky director was the last word on artistic risk.
View attachment 131638
![]()
DC Studios’ Luca Guadagnino Movie ‘Sgt. Rock’ Not Moving Forward
Colin Farrell was to play the DC soldier in a feature that had Guadagnino on board to direct.www.hollywoodreporter.com
OK so is it a risky venture outside his wheelhouse or isn't it?That's the problem. A Sgt. Rock movie wouldn't be an artistic risk.
Pivot number 2.That's the problem. A Sgt. Rock movie wouldn't be an artistic risk.
OK so is it a risky venture outside his wheelhouse or isn't it?
What an insane comparison lmaoTell that to Joker: Folie a Deux.
So it is a creative risk now?It is. And I hope it doesn't happen.
So it is a creative risk now?