Should Superman be the sole survivor of Krypton?

Yes, Superman should be the sole survivor of Krypton.
It makes him more unique and special and
That's the way Jerry Siegel & Joe Shuster Created him and that's the way it should be.
 
Siegel and Shuster themselves designed a slew of Kryptonian characters, didn't they? The way that a character begins is hardly supposed to be the way that the character stays. How many characters these days are exactly the way that their original creators intended?
 
You have a point BrianWilly

But I still think Superman should be the sole survivor of Krypton. It gives his character more depth and makes him seem like more of a miracle and a God send. But when there's like five kryptonians running around it cheapens Kal-El's character and makes him less unique.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"