IBRAH08
JLI
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2008
- Messages
- 1,205
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
While I believe that the case for that is slim, there could still be a good movie
without the realism.
![]()
I don't mean to call you out but you seem to praise NOlan for his accuracy to the comics (I would say he is as close as any of the other directors as they are all emulating different time periods) and yet you say you can only see realistic Batman working.There are WAY more interpretations to be had ESPECIALLY in the comics (and even more so right now) that are not street level or "realistic" like you seem to want. One such book, Batman and Robin is by far the most popular book right now and it has resurrections and cults and gods and time travel. DOn't limit yourself to the cool movie you saw recently. There is much much much more to be had. NOlan is only accurate to one of many comic renderings of Batman. And you say you want Nolan to be even MORE realism based? What would that mean? no more cape or bat ears? I feel like that becomes a slippery slope very quickly.
Last edited:
Actually, I have yet to read comic books and graphic novels. A lot of material I find goofy, needing a better writer, mostly spin-offs. Infinite Crisis? What is that? I will look up comic book information from time to time because I enjoy literature and semantic studies. Batman, from what I can tell, has a story rich in semantics. I read of great reviews of The Watchmen and The Dark Knight Returns, though, I would wish to reserve judgment until I've reviewed. I want Nolan to be more realistically based because I see room for very very minor improvements. 

