Sequels Singer intereated on directing Superman vs Batman

Who Should directed?

  • SINGER

  • NOLAN

  • OTHER


Results are only viewable after voting.
retconned said:
Nolan's work is better than anything Singer ever did. Usual Supsects is overrated, and Batman Begins is not only light years aboce Superman Returns, it's better than X-Men as well.

Nolan/Goyer is a much better and smarter combo than the wack pack ( Singer/Harris/Dougherty ).

ROFL... Why are you attacking Singer? I didnt even say he was better than Nolan :confused:
 
retconned said:
The wack pack would destroy everything Singer has built. The only familiarity Singer probably has with Batman is the old Adam West tv series.

That would be Singer's Batman, a sequel to that bloody Batman movie with Adam West, and then all the Singer fanboys can say he is just using vague history.

Get over the whole "OMG! Singer only watched teh Donner film!!!111" because its simply not true :o

It would still be better than getting yet another Batman film where Bruce Wayne is more interesting than Batman.
 
Nolan or someone else. Keep Singer away from it. Damn, remember last year when we heard the news we were all excited he was on Superman. Singer you had our backs, and you fed it up.
 
retconned said:
Deff, Nolan actually knows how to tell a character driven story and doesn't surround himself with idiots like Dougherty/Harris.

Because you didn't like SR, you consider the writers? Wow! I would like to see you try & make better story than you. Otherwise, you're just ranting & complaining, making you look like one instead. Just don't sit your butt on the chair & complain online if you think they are idiots. Try writing a movie & see if you can do better. And Nolan is not a god. He's great, but a god? Not really. :p

And I rather both Singer & Nolan handle it. One direct Supes & other direct Batman in the movie. :)
 
Nightwing1977 said:
Because you didn't like SR, you consider the writers? Wow! I would like to see you try & make better story than you. Otherwise, you're just ranting & complaining, making you look like one instead. Just don't sit your butt on the chair & complain online if you think they are idiots. Try writing a movie & see if you can do better. And Nolan is not a god. He's great, but a god? Not really. :p

And I rather both Singer & Nolan handle it. One direct Supes & other direct Batman in the movie. :)

1. I only bashed the writers because there bad at there job and they wrote a boring, un-romantic, excitement lacking film. They couldn't even accomplish what they set out to do in the first place, let alone could they grasp Batman and Superman together.

2. I have no doubt in my mind I could write a better story than the wack pack.
 
Mentok said:
Get over the whole "OMG! Singer only watched teh Donner film!!!111" because its simply not true :o

It would still be better than getting yet another Batman film where Bruce Wayne is more interesting than Batman.

Yes, because it is so evident Singer knows something about Superman outside of Donner's film. What, a comic cover?

And I bet you would like to go back to how the old Batman films were made, you know, where the villian got more character development and screen time.

Your opinion is as one sided as the so called haters on the Superman boards, your just at the other end of the spectrum,
 
retconned said:
1. I only bashed the writers because there bad at there job and they wrote a boring, un-romantic, excitement lacking film. They couldn't even accomplish what they set out to do in the first place, let alone could they grasp Batman and Superman together.

Just because they didn't write the way you want don't mean they are idiot.

2. I have no doubt in my mind I could write a better story than the wack pack.

LMAO!! Yeah right, kid. Keep telling yourself that, because I doubt you can. You got to have a big ego to think you're better at telling a story than 2 professional writers in Hollywood that wrote 2 great comic book movies. If you're better than them, why are you wasting your time sitting your butt on the chair, while whining & complaining about SR not done your way on the computer? Shouldn't you be writing something now & send it to Hollywood as proof you are better? I pity your shallow mind with your ego problem here. Oh well. May as well take some Ritalin. It good for your soul. ;)
 
retconned said:
Yes, because it is so evident Singer knows something about Superman outside of Donner's film. What, a comic cover?

And Nolan only used 2 comicbooks to get his story... Oh and all the other crap Batman films for the stupid black rubber suit.

And I bet you would like to go back to how the old Batman films were made, you know, where the villian got more character development and screen time.

Dont speak for other people, you come off as a dick... Almost as badly as your first post in this thread. What I want (and what I was told I was getting) was a Batman film, yet again they failed and made Batman the least interesting character. It should be called 'Bruce Wayne Begins' not 'Batman Begins'.

Your opinion is as one sided as the so called haters on the Superman boards, your just at the other end of the spectrum,

Yes it is, since I thought the film was good (could have been better) and I listed my numerous complaints with the film.

That makes me just like you :rolleyes:
 
Keep Singer the hell away from Batman. I wouldn't even have him return for a Superman film.
 
DrMylesOBoogie said:
Keep Singer the hell away from Batman. I wouldn't even have him return for a Superman film.

I agree with you.

The thing is, if you have another director come in for Superman, they either need to do a reboot, or find a way to deal with the kid, as I'm going to guess there's directors that wouldn't want him there in the first place. The kid is a difficult plot device to work around or get rid of.

It looks like Singer and his whack pack Harris & Daugherty are going to be given the greenlight to do the sequel as they will be at Comic Con this year talking about SR.
 
ah.. there are many ways they can go..i would imagine killing the kid is a god way to start..or even have the kid grow up at a accelerated pace and have the kid be the bad guy..like a new take on bizaro.
 
Hopefully batman vs superman won`t happen while singer is in charge because hopefully nolan will object to the idea due to singers hackiness not fitting with the great stuff nolan himself is doing with the batman mythos.

I mean how can batman be the villain? If batman is a villain a) it is way off the mark and b) thereby he would be taken down in 5 secs. if he didn`t have kryptonite on him supes would tap him once on every joint (knees and elbows) and then hoist the paralysed batman on his back and fly him to prison. What kind of fight scenes can you have between superman and batamn in that situation? Its like punisher vs hulk, it is nearly completly infeasible.
 
Iceburgeruk said:
I mean how can batman be the villain? If batman is a villain a) it is way off the mark and b) thereby he would be taken down in 5 secs. if he didn`t have kryptonite on him supes would tap him once on every joint (knees and elbows) and then hoist the paralysed batman on his back and fly him to prison. What kind of fight scenes can you have between superman and batamn in that situation? Its like punisher vs hulk, it is nearly completly infeasible.

Batman has beaten Superman in almost every fight they have ever had.
 
Nightwing1977 said:
Just because they didn't write the way you want don't mean they are idiot.



LMAO!! Yeah right, kid. Keep telling yourself that, because I doubt you can. You got to have a big ego to think you're better at telling a story than 2 professional writers in Hollywood that wrote 2 great comic book movies. If you're better than them, why are you wasting your time sitting your butt on the chair, while whining & complaining about SR not done your way on the computer? Shouldn't you be writing something now & send it to Hollywood as proof you are better? I pity your shallow mind with your ego problem here. Oh well. May as well take some Ritalin. It good for your soul. ;)

1. Yes, there idiots. They have wrote two comic book films. X-Men 2, while a decent flick, left alot of things to be desired, the problem with all 3 X-Men films. At the end of each film, I said to myself.....thats it. And the wack pack's work of heart filled art, Superman Returns, is famous in my eyes for it's so called romantic story that made all the teeny bopper film romances look like Oscar gold, and all the epic scenes that lacked most if not all substance.

2. Don't come at me with your pathetic Ritalin jokes or say that I have a qoute on qoute shallow mind. I didn't say a good or bad word about this film until I watched in theaters, and it was awful. I went in to the theaters happy, and left pissed off. So know, Im not like all the fanboys on this site who talked up the movie, good or bad, before they watched it. You aren't ready to get in my cyber face, you little c#ck muscle.
 
Mentok said:
And Nolan only used 2 comicbooks to get his story... Oh and all the other crap Batman films for the stupid black rubber suit.



Dont speak for other people, you come off as a dick... Almost as badly as your first post in this thread. What I want (and what I was told I was getting) was a Batman film, yet again they failed and made Batman the least interesting character. It should be called 'Bruce Wayne Begins' not 'Batman Begins'.



Yes it is, since I thought the film was good (could have been better) and I listed my numerous complaints with the film.

That makes me just like you :rolleyes:

1. True, Nolan only used about two comic books and the rubber suit, but Nolan made a great film, so it's ok :up: Not to mention it wasn't a knock off of the source material ignoring franchise of old, so another high five goes Nolan's way, as well as David Goyers.

2. I am a dick, I know. Im sorry that I waited all these years for the greatest Superman film ever and I didn't get it. To believe I actually defended this movie before it came out, that I waited to see it and then pass judgement, and then for it to be the piece of **** that it was.

And by the way, Bruce Wayne IS Batman. The true Bruce Wayne is Batman, and being that it was his origin, it made alot of sense for it to be centered around Bruce without the mask, seeing that it's Batman anyway. The disguise is the playboy Wayne, who we didn't see much of. So yes, you got alot of Batman, in his early stages. Im sure in the sequels to come you will the great detective at work.
 
retconned said:
1. True, Nolan only used about two comic books and the rubber suit, but Nolan made a great film, so it's ok :up: Not to mention it wasn't a knock off of the source material ignoring franchise of old, so another high five goes Nolan's way, as well as David Goyers.

Sorry, BB is not a great film.

2. I am a dick, I know. Im sorry that I waited all these years for the greatest Superman film ever and I didn't get it. To believe I actually defended this movie before it came out, that I waited to see it and then pass judgement, and then for it to be the piece of **** that it was.

Guess what, you are in the minority... get used to it.

And by the way, Bruce Wayne IS Batman. The true Bruce Wayne is Batman, and being that it was his origin, it made alot of sense for it to be centered around Bruce without the mask, seeing that it's Batman anyway. The disguise is the playboy Wayne, who we didn't see much of. So yes, you got alot of Batman, in his early stages. Im sure in the sequels to come you will the great detective at work.

Yes thats true, unfortunetly they failed to make Batman interesting at all. But hey, I know im in the minority on that one anyway.
 
Mentok said:
Sorry, BB is not a great film.

Well i think it was and so do a great majority but that's what makes this argument redundant,it is based solely on subjectivity so no matter how many times you say BB wasn't great or how many times he says SR is crap it doesn't make it fact and statistically speaking both of you are in the minority
 
hunter rider said:
Well i think it was and so do a great majority but that's what makes this argument redundant,it is based solely on subjectivity so no matter how many times you say BB wasn't great or how many times he says SR is crap it doesn't make it fact and statistically speaking both of you are in the minority

Bingo :up:
 
Singer sucks and he cannot direct action to save his life. Both X-Men movies had crap fighting and Superman is well, not so super.

Get someone like Cameron or McTiernan.
 
LongDong said:
You would probably do better than Singer, so you get my vote!!

Why thank you. I thought my version of Superman Returns was better than Singer's, but God only knows what others would think. I have a synopses in the "If you had 200 million dollars what would you do" thread but no one commented. Maybe it was that bad?
 
retconned said:
I posted this in the Returns forum, but I geuss it belongs here as well......

LEAVE IT TO CHRISTOPHER NOLAN GOD DAMNIT

If I can be totally tasteless for a minute, Singer you son of a b*tch, if you touch this movie I'll kill you. Me, killing you, remember it. Leave this film to Nolan and Goyer, don't you or your pathetic lackeys Harris and Dougherty get near this precious piece of work, we don't need two and a half hours of nothing, just plain and simply mother *****ing nothing.

Nolan will own your god damn, mother *****ing soul Singer and you better remember that. Go make Logans Run and stay the ***** away from Batman. You have no right, no god damn right, to ***** on what Nolan has started, just like you ***** on everything that has helped the character of Superman evolve post-Donner.

DO NOT HARM BATMAN!
__________________


you've got issues my friend. ps singer did an awsome job on superman.
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"