Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]267166[/split]
Hellooooooo, Babydoll!
http://www.slashfilm.com/rumor-superman-third-act-problems/
if you are a Snyder fan then this is not true. if you are not a fan then you belive the story.
Slashfilm is tring to give it a negative spin? no way.
and the Owl movie did not good at the BO since it was a kids movie and in 3D.
if you make 50 cent you also made money. they didnt make enough money.It made money right? It was not a flop, and it got good reviews. they say nothing at all about the actual quality of the movie, just a vague description of it 'flying silently into the distance.', meaning it made no great impact on the BO.
.
if you make 50 cent you also made money. they didnt make enough money.
there is no way that the Owl movie cost under 100 million. no logic. there is no way that it was under 120.
Sucker Punch strikes me as a movie that would test poorly whether it was good or bad. It seems way too out-there for the GA. It appeals to a studio on paper, because it feels like it was written by an adolescent boy who just hit puberty, and that's kind of the appeal. But I can't imagine that a movie defined by it's refusal to make any sense would test well.
^I have a feeling it will do similar to Scott Pilgrim, which was a little gem of a film.
exactly i dont care what some critics say watchmen got some lukewarm reviews and a 64 RT Rating and it was my favorite film of 2009.
i am going in expecting a balls to the wall action/fantasy film and that is what i am gonna get i am not going in with some pre conceived notion that this is gonna be some deep character drama with a extremely smart narrative and riveting dialogue.
i just want an action movie and snyder is promoting it as such and that is what i believe i am gonna get