Well I'm looking forward to the film. I'm wondering how Snyder will do with an original film. One thing is for sure, he needs to make sure he doesn't confuse the audience.
One actually would have to put in actual effort to be more straight forward than Inception.It should be easier and faster to understand than Inception.
What I am saying is Inception is as straightforward as they come.
Only thing I didn't understand about Inception was how they were able to pull/go into other peoples subconscious.
Go for it for both.In terms of what? How were they going to go in general or how they were going to go into others in the dreams? Because I could answer either.
Like the avatar, disagreed about GuginoGugino's Russian accent is sooooo bad. She's such a terrible actress. The movie itself looks pretty fun, though.
Go for it for both.
Gugino's Russian accent is sooooo bad. She's such a terrible actress. The movie itself looks pretty fun, though.
What I am saying is Inception is as straightforward as they come.
when you use 95% of slow motion then yes its true that is not confusing .The imagery isn't confusing. its well shot. This ain't a Michael bay flick. And unlike Michael Bay flicks, this looks to have some meat you can chew on after you leave the theater. This looks like Snyder's best film.
I caved in yesterday and watched Transformers, and my god, does Bay know what shot composition and editing is?
I had a new appreciation of Snyder right then.

Honestly better than Bay's and Tony Scott's ADD editing.when you use 95% of slow motion then yes its true that is not confusing .![]()