Snyder Throws a Sucker Punch

Status
Not open for further replies.
Same here, that's why the uglification is more apparent I think.
 
Guess I'll wait till I see the HiDef ones then :yay:


I gotta say though, I don't like how they managed Jena Malone to look ugly

Slashfilm posted them a few days ago.
 
That's where I got the pics for the poster banner.:huh:

I didn't think they looked bad
 
I just realised we got two Aussie girls in this film. Awesome.
 
Me thinks those costumes are going to be very popular at all the pop culture expos and comic conventions next year. Come on girls, get crackin'!
 
You just know this is going to appeal to the alternative crowd. I'm afraid the GA just wont get this.
 
love this answer by Snyder

In the Q&A, Snyder addressed those who criticize he is too literal in his adaptations.

“No one would say that to someone for a normal novel,” he said. “ ’You filmed too much of that book!' Especially for a graphic novel, I’m not supposed to film a drawing that exists? That’s crazy.”
 
Haven't seen this in the descriptions anywhere... why is the movie called Sucker Punch?
 
So apparently the trailer for this is awesome, look forward to seeing it. :up:
 
According to G4's live blog, Snyder says he's aiming for PG-13. I'm not disappointed, but I am surprised.
i remember him saying PG-13 with ROTK in mind, which of course had flying decapitated heads among other things that it got away with.

sweet!:woot:

it is sorta like 300 in that its very stylistic, but unique in its own way that it can define itself from his other films.



Project862006 said:
love this answer by Snyder
In the Q&A, Snyder addressed those who criticize he is too literal in his adaptations.

“No one would say that to someone for a normal novel,” he said. “ ’You filmed too much of that book!' Especially for a graphic novel, I’m not supposed to film a drawing that exists? That’s crazy.”
i cant believe he still has to defend his filming style. either those are just a bunch of jealous turds or detractors that has nothing else better to write about.
 
Yeah the PG-13 thing has me going wtf because as soon as read the synopsis for the movie I was thinking nothing but R rated so it is surprising. Will be nice to finally see the trailer to just get a better idea on the content of the film.
 
well i doubt there's going to be a lot of gratuitous nudity in this, i'm getting a strong girl power vibe from what we've seen, so i think the nudity would kind if defeat the purpose.
 
With how slinky the costumes are, there's really no need for nudity
 
well i doubt there's going to be a lot of gratuitous nudity in this, i'm getting a strong girl power vibe from what we've seen, so i think the nudity would kind if defeat the purpose.

Wasn't really expecting graphic nudity but I was expecting graphic violence like on a Kill Bill type of level. But if Snyder says a lot of it can be chalked up to "creature violence" then maybe it could in fact pull off the PG-13 rating. I just really pray it is SNYDER'S intent and not the STUDIO'S. One of the things I have always liked about Snyder's movies is they have balls and don't pander to studios who just want to get more kids in theater seats.
 
yeah that's something i love about snyder, guys got integrity, and a great visual eye too. only problem i have is he has a problem with narrative. in 300 it jump from scene to scene so abruptly sometimes i'd have no idea what the hell was going on lol.
 
Great. Hoping is the same length as the one they show at SDCC.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum statistics

Threads
202,346
Messages
22,088,565
Members
45,887
Latest member
Elchido
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"