DA Harvey Dent
Civilian
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2005
- Messages
- 694
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
Let me preface my CR review by saying that Goldfinger with Connery as Bond is my #1 Bond film of all time. IMO Connery was the prototypical Bond. He had it all - the good looks, the charisma, the ruthlessness.
POSSIBLE SPOILERS:
CR was a great film and it had everything a Bond film should have - simplified dialogue, gratuitious violence, wide shots of Bond with his trademark "blue steel" expression, torture scene with and F-you manner from Bond, wrecked Aston Martin, easy women, etc.
But alas, CR was lacking one thing - namely James Bond himself. Now I was never a fan of Craig from the beginning. But I gave him the benefit of the doubt going into seeing CR. Given the positive reviews I figured while Craig may not have the good looks, he must have the charisma and ruthlessness of Bond. Well, He DOES have the ruthlessness. But he has ZERO charisma and lacks the good looks that epitomize James Bond. Le Chiffre, Le Chiffre's assistant, M's assistant, heck even the chinaman with the ponytail at the poker table looked more like James Bond than Daniel Craig.
Now, I know some of you may say, "Harvey, this is a reboot, Bond isn't established yet and thus he's rough around the edges." I can see that view, however take for instance Batman Begins. This was a reboot of the franchise and although it was grounded in reality, Bruce Wayne/Batman in Begins was never far removed from his portrait in the source material. Even without Bale's skilled acting and dedication to the role, he still LOOKED the part whereas Craig does not.
Ulitmately, CR does succeed in setting back the dial on the franchise but not completely. The franchise has a new direction, all it needs is a new bond. Close but no cigar.
POSSIBLE SPOILERS:
CR was a great film and it had everything a Bond film should have - simplified dialogue, gratuitious violence, wide shots of Bond with his trademark "blue steel" expression, torture scene with and F-you manner from Bond, wrecked Aston Martin, easy women, etc.
But alas, CR was lacking one thing - namely James Bond himself. Now I was never a fan of Craig from the beginning. But I gave him the benefit of the doubt going into seeing CR. Given the positive reviews I figured while Craig may not have the good looks, he must have the charisma and ruthlessness of Bond. Well, He DOES have the ruthlessness. But he has ZERO charisma and lacks the good looks that epitomize James Bond. Le Chiffre, Le Chiffre's assistant, M's assistant, heck even the chinaman with the ponytail at the poker table looked more like James Bond than Daniel Craig.
Now, I know some of you may say, "Harvey, this is a reboot, Bond isn't established yet and thus he's rough around the edges." I can see that view, however take for instance Batman Begins. This was a reboot of the franchise and although it was grounded in reality, Bruce Wayne/Batman in Begins was never far removed from his portrait in the source material. Even without Bale's skilled acting and dedication to the role, he still LOOKED the part whereas Craig does not.
Ulitmately, CR does succeed in setting back the dial on the franchise but not completely. The franchise has a new direction, all it needs is a new bond. Close but no cigar.