mathhater said:I'm pretty sure Wonder Woman's never been raped. I read an interview with someone from DC once (can't remember who...possibly Didio, but I don't know,) and the interviewee said something along the lines of "A lot of writers come in with a pitch like, 'Okay, so Wonder Woman gets raped...'" and if I remember correctly, this is an idea that usually gets vetoed pretty quickly...as that's not a direction DC wants to take the character.

She killed Maxwell Lord because he had gained control of Superman's consciousness through telepathy.kainedamo said:Didn't she murder some guy 'cause she was pissed that he raped her??![]()

Imagine the papercuts.Kool-Aid said:I liked this book. I bought the hardcover a month or so ago. More girls should be raped in comics or by comics.


CConn said:I highly doubt that. I can think of nearly two dozen gay/bi characters in comics. So far, everyone in this thread has been able to come up with barely four raped characters.

CConn said:...and I actually really liked it.
With all the complaints that have been given about Kevin Smith's three year delay in finishing the series, the quality of the whole thing seems to get drowned out.
I was really struck by just how wonderful a spotlight it was for Black Cat. As the title suggests, this is Spider-Man AND the Black Cat. And it's all done very well. The characterization and banter between the characters is excellent. It plainly reminded me why I've quickly become a bit of a fan of Black Cat, and what a solid supporting character she can be to Spider-Man.
Now that's the first half of the book. The second half - while still focusing very much on Black Cat - takes a very different angle. Namely rape and sexual abuse. This is dark stuff. This is disturbing stuff. The kind of subject matter that is almost always uncomfortable to read. At the same time, it's a subject matter that should be read. People should understand what it's like to be raped. Both as an act of prevention against committing it, and as a compassion for the people who have suffered it. Smith details that perfectly. He shows exactly what it does to people. Shows just how truly horrible it is. And that, while uncomfortable, is ultimately powerful. Very powerful.
With that said, I would be remiss to mention the art. It's fantastic. I've always been a fan of the Dodson's, and this - next to their current Wonder Woman run - may be the best art they've ever turned out. While I generally consider their style to be a rather light one, it actually ends up fitting the darkness of the story very well, making the whole book all the more captivating to read.
While it may very well be too uncomfortable for me to read again, I must say, the book certainly left a great impact on me, and I'm certainly glad I spent my $15 bucks, and 2 hours to read it.
SpideyInATree said:There was also rape in the Watchmen series as well. I can't recall the woman's name but Comedian laid the wood to her without her consent.![]()
SpideyInATree said:There was also rape in the Watchmen series as well. I can't recall the woman's name but Comedian laid the wood to her without her consent.![]()
Kinda. There was a general review in the first post, then a few follow-ups and then it moved on to a discussion of the presence of rape in comics because that's one of the themes in the book. IMO, it was a pretty good read, it's just the inclusion of the rape subject matter that stems debate (as to whether or not it was necessary or added anything to the story).roni14 said:Aren't we REALLY off topic now? I thought this was about the book evil that men do, and innocent little me decides to read up on it, because I don't have it, and want to know if it's any good. And all I hear about are DC character getting raped. WTF?
I wouldn't quite say that's what stems the debate. I mean, the point of the book becomes the rape(s) after the last few issues. The debate's more should it have been about rape to begin with.Mister J said:IMO, it was a pretty good read, it's just the inclusion of the rape subject matter that stems debate (as to whether or not it was necessary or added anything to the story).
In my defense, I was blindingly drunk when I wrote thatCConn said:I wouldn't quite say that's what stems the debate. I mean, the point of the book becomes the rape(s) after the last few issues. The debate's more should it have been about rape to begin with.
, but your take is more accurate as to what's transpired.