• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Thursday Aug 14, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST. This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Homecoming Sony E-mails on wikileaks

Wasn't there some email which revealed how much SONY got from amazing spider-man 2?
 
Ya if I recall they only made like 60 mill off it after overhead and other production things.
 
For some reason i'm not finding that email, anyone has an article with it or an image?
 
Wish I could help but I don't recall it myself either. I am sure someone will find it easier then me.
 
If Sony already knew The Amazing Spiderman 2 was a mess, why did they still promote it so aggressively? If I were them, I'd have cut back on soe of my marketing material, and rely on Spiderman's name to help recoup some loses, instead of pushing so aggressively, fatiguing audience before the film even came out.
 
My guess is they where hoping things were going to work out. And then when they saw it didnt. They panicked and was trying to come up with new plans. And as we saw plans went to far out of whack. Working with marvel was for there best interest.
 
If Sony already knew The Amazing Spiderman 2 was a mess, why did they still promote it so aggressively? If I were them, I'd have cut back on soe of my marketing material, and rely on Spiderman's name to help recoup some loses, instead of pushing so aggressively, fatiguing audience before the film even came out.

source? according to Sony they were extremely proud of the film. Matt Tolmach called it "A breathtaking story". Avi Arad mentioned how the fan reaction was so positive.


 
source? according to Sony they were extremely proud of the film. Matt Tolmach called it "A breathtaking story". Avi Arad mentioned how the fan reaction was so positive.
You're replying to a 9 year old post and the dude hasn't logged on in 5 years. Don't think you're gonna get a reply lol.

To answer your question, it's been pretty well documented in the leaks and the years since that interally Sony was unhappy with the movie.
 
Last edited:
You're replying to a 9 year old post and the dude hasn't logged on in 5 years. Don't think you're gonna get a reply lol.

To answer your question, it's been pretty well documented in the leaks and the years since that interally Sony was unhappy with the movie.
lol. I've read through the leaks and no it's not documented that Sony was unhappy with it. At least before it was worldwide released. Seemed like they were happy with how the movie was opening. Where did anyone at Sony have problems with it? They had pretty ambitious expectations for the film

 
lol. I've read through the leaks and no it's not documented that Sony was unhappy with it. At least before it was worldwide released. Seemed like they were happy with how the movie was opening. Where did anyone at Sony have problems with it? They had pretty ambitious expectations for the film
Then you didn't look hard enough then.

Email from Amy Pascal a little over a month before it released. TLDR, she hated everything about it.

 
Last edited:
Bumping a thread like 9 years after the fact and being condescending about it in your "first" posts on here? Interesting
people are outright lying... what was condescending. Asking for a source?
 
Then you didn't look hard enough then.

Email from Amy Pascal a little over a month before it released. TLDR, she hated everything about it.

I've seen that. One person at all of Sony? She could have changed anything she wanted. She had the most say over those films. Didn't hear anything but praise from the producers, writers, and everyone else in the Sony Emails.

Oh and Avi Arad said Fiege liked it

 
Last edited:
people are outright lying... what was condescending. Asking for a source?
You started that post with LOL. That's passive aggressive, amigo. And again....the post that initiated this was 9 years old. You're arguing a topic that's not been relevant for a decade. And based on post history, it's your only comment. It's very troll behavior to just restart a 9 year old argument. You need to let this go, amigo. It's been a decade. Everyone else has moved on at this point
 
You started that post with LOL. That's passive aggressive, amigo. And again....the post that initiated this was 9 years old. You're arguing a topic that's not been relevant for a decade. And based on post history, it's your only comment. It's very troll behavior to just restart a 9 year old argument. You need to let this go, amigo. It's been a decade. Everyone else has moved on at this point
wasn't an argument I started. I just wanted to know where sony alluded to ASM2 being a mess as that guy claimed. yet no one has really answered and that's fine
 
wasn't an argument I started. I just wanted to know where sony alluded to ASM2 being a mess as that guy claimed. yet no one has really answered and that's fine
As a guy claimed.....9 years ago! Let. It. Go.
 
wasn't an argument I started. I just wanted to know where sony alluded to ASM2 being a mess as that guy claimed. yet no one has really answered and that's fine
Do you think they'd just say it outright? What would the purpose be? The proof of their issue with it, is they went to Disney/Marvel to reboot the franchise for the second time in 5 years.
 
And obvious troll is gone. Obviously
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"