Maximum Carnage
Tanned User
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2005
- Messages
- 4,556
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
they couldn't get anyone to work in that section without pay...![]()
.. Lmao!
they couldn't get anyone to work in that section without pay...![]()
And there's no real good reason to abolish something they cherish as well. If it's something they rally behind, and feel unity towards, there's really no good reason to tell them, "No, can't have it."
There is a good reason to not have the Confederate flag be a part of a state's flag or symbol. There is a good reason not to have the Union Jack be a part of a state's flag or symbol.
Those are symbols of aggressors of the United States and therefore should not be used as part of the state's symbol.
Like said before, that's a connotation given to them, and an unfair one at that. If it's their heritage and their preference, we have no right to tell them otherwise, as it's really a symbol of state rights, which they are big supporters of. It's their tradition and culture to display as they enjoy. Just because a few high notice groups have used it for purposes not exactly echoing them doesn't mean that they shouldn't be able to use it because we feel it's not necessary.
As for the Union Jack reference, the only part of it looking like Union Jack is the fact it's two crossing bars in an X pattern, and that's it's ONLY reference it makes. It'd be like saying the current American flag is reminiscent of French culture due to coloring, and should be abandoned by principle. (Considering you're talking about the battle flag of the confederacy, a rendition of their stainless flag. If not, then it pretty much resembles the current American flag in many ways.)
It is not a symbol of "state rights" it is a symbol of a country that seperated from the union. It is a symbol of rebellion against the union. It has nothing to do with heritage. As I mentioned before in the entire history of the world that flag was only used to represent the Confederate States of America for four small years.
:facepalm
Did you even read my post? I wasn't comparing the visual similarities I was comparing those two flags together because they were both flags of countries that were at war with the US.
The fact is that displaying the flag of the Confederate States of America is no different than displaying the flag of Japan, Nazi Germany, Great Britian, Iraq or any other country we've been at war with as an official symbol.
can anything be done to erase the negative connotations or perceptions that the Confedrate flag has??
The style of the buildings and attractions are structured to echo each section's theme. The Monster Plantation, for example.
Granted, it is. But I doubt they would like to abandon their pride for that.
Probably not because public perception is a ***** and when you have it STILL making appearances at Klan rallies and such.
As an African American you know how much grief I was get walking down the street wearing a blue bandanna? The bandanna in and of itself is meaningless, but because a bunch *******s use it to signify being part of a certain gang, if I'M seen wearing it people (especially cops) assume i'm part of that same game...public perception is a ***** and is VERY hard to change.
If that's the case then I can see why it was taken down. I know if I went to an amusement park and say they had a confederacy section it'd be a lil off putting. Like I said if you're a decedent of the people who were beaten, mutilated, raped, an lynched on a pretty regular basis in those days I'd doubt you'd want to see an amusement park dedicated to it. Just like if I was Native American I couldn't see myself going to many thanksgiving dinners or amusement parks with an old west theme.
If that's the case then they should speak out more and be more outraged when those groups DO use that flag, or at least show an inkling of understanding as to why some people are SO offended by it.
The reality of it is that despite the flags original meaning it's been used MUCH longer as the flag of choice by violent bigots than anything else.After the civil war The Klan would often have it flying along with that white cross symbol of theirs was the murdered thousands of black people, the flag also made regular appearances at pro-segregation rallies during the civil rights movement, and it STILL makes appearances today at Klan rallies and such.
They probably do on some level speak out against it, and it doesn't help a good plethora of the hate groups probably originate from those states. And they probably DO understand the hatred that comes from them. But again, it's their cultural pride. They're not going to answer for other people.
Mistress Gluon said:the flag was used as a battle standard developed during the Civil War, and was used AFTER the Civil War for racist activities. And while the flag DOES turn up at those events often, it's still the flag of a people who accept that flag as their own.
The thing is more often than not there's a completely and willful lack of understand on some people's part as to why others get upset about it, some pretend as if it's not a symbol of hatred to many and act as if the people offended are being oversensitive.
It's less of an issue if some guy or girl on the street wants to wear or wave that flag, me personally I'll just look at them funny and keep it moving, but if I'm a citizen of a certain state I'm damn sure not gonna want to see that flag flying on alongside the US flag, that'd be like the nazi swastika flying with he US flag to a lot of people.
I don't think it's fair when people say it's a symbol of southern culture and pride. Millions of black folk live in the south too and are entrenched in the culture and they don't look at that flag as a symbol of pride at all.
I understand what the flag was used for during that brief period of the civil war, but as I said it's been used as a symbol of hate for MUCH MUCH MUCH longer than that. The argument (no matter how honest it may be) that it's JUST a symbol of southern culture and pride is a very recent thing.
I mean it's kinda like me and the bandanna thing. You can go ahead and wear that flag and wave it all you like but you better know that a good amount of folks are gonna look at and think "bigot", just like they'd look at me in a bandanna and think "gang member"....it may not be fair but it is understandable.
While I definitely agree that the use of the battle flag has more or less been a resurgence of symbolism for the south, I disagree they fly it outside the US as part of the US flagset, and really only fly it over the states who don't mind it, who is exactly who I'm defending on it.
Mistress Gluon said:yeah, it's been used WAY longer, and WAY more often for racist ties, (and there's no lying, there's a good chance those who fly it have racial tendencies regardless), it's still a flag they choose to have represent them, and as long as they regard it as such, it will be recognized by them as a symbol of southern culture and pride. They don't slap it on the back of their trucks because it looks cool after all, it's just how they view it.
And I agree, it's understandable that people will be apprehensive at it's sight, which is something I experienced as well when I first came to America. (During the Iraq Invasion was not a pleasant time for some Frenchborn to be hanging around those who might view us as not being people to be nice to.) However, the people who do proudly display that standard don't care, and probably won't even if you guys tell them they should consider the other connotations which come with said standard. It's always going to fall to the point of what they want to represent them, and if that's what they want to represent them, then it's what they'll do. It literally is no different for a Nazi themed flag (as terrible as it is). You guys can't simply retire it because you don't want them to use it, because they'll just use it anyway. They'll probably just take it as an infrigement of their state rights to use it.
I know they don't fly it outside of the US, but they do fly it at capital buildings in some states and many people who LIVE in those states don't want it there and find it highly offensive. Anything flying from a flag pole of a states government buildings should represent ALL the people of that state not just one segment of it's population, and it certainly shouldn't offend large portions of the states population which that flag indeed does.
I'm not saying people don't have the right to fly that flag, it's their right as american citizens. I just I just don't like the willful ignorance that comes along with some people defending the flag, especially when those people are elected officials.
I don't think you could ever really get EVERYBODY to agree on a flag. lol
And I don't blame you for not liking it. I wouldn't care for it either, personally.