I wasn't telling loyal readers anything.
I was a loyal reader myself who happened to think that Ben Reilly being the original Peter Parker was a dynamic thing. And, even so, Marvel, the writers and editors, were not tell you that the past was worthless. It seems that no one reads these stories sometimes and they just want to shoot from the hip about how their favorite character is used.
Whether Peter Parker was a clone or not it's still not worthless. The whole moral of the story was that clone or real person that deep down Peter Parker would always do the right thing and continue the motto of "Great Power comes Great Responsibility". Whether the clone was Ben Reilly or Peter Parker it still boiled down to the fact that Peter's character could never be broken. He was always a good person. Heck, even Kaine, who was a very flawed clone, still had that goodness buried deep down inside of him despite everything that happened. Peter Parker being the clone, to me, still wouldn't cheapen the stories. It was still Peter Parker, clone or not, and it was still Spider-Man. There really was no difference if it had been the real Peter or the cloned Peter. It always boiled down to Peter Parker doing what was right.
Peter Parker would have went off to Oregon with his wife and child and lived happily ever after. Hell, Marvel could have done a spin off with Peter. Meanwhile Ben Reilly continues on the spectre of Spider-Man, being single, and Peter and Mary Jane would still be married. Baby May would still be in continuity, and by now she would probably be entering later childhood and developing her spider-powers.
It didn't turn out that way and hindsight is always 20/20. That's just the way I felt about the Clone Saga. Just like I don't think One More Day didn't erase 20 years of continuity. The only thing that it erased was the marriage and his identity being public knowledge.