Still applies. I could totally hear someone saying, "You can't win, Colonel."
Of course we know it was supposed to be his name.
I'm just saying, lucky for George, it still works.
Lucas sez that the name Dath Vader came from the character's role as a "Dark Invader." So yes, it was -- at first -- the character's intended name, hence the Lord Vader title, hence Obi-Wan referring to him as Darth. But I agree with Wilhelm, it still works as an impersonal label, an acknowledgement of the rift between them and Anakin's new alliegance.
I also doubt that the Imperials would refer to him by a Sith title, since its clear from the views expressed on the Death Star in New Hope that the contemporary generation had no faith in the reality of the Force. In fact, I don't think the Imps ever knew that they worked for the Sith at all. The Emporer kept his own powers a secret, relying on military might and technology to accomplish his goals. That's obvious in Ep. III, but also seems the case in Ep. IV, since Tarkin refers to Vader as the last of the
Jedi -- not as a Sith. If they knew of the Sith at all, it was probably as a legend.
DarthRekal said:
Darth Maul.. Darth Sidious.. Darth Malak... Darth Tyrannus...Darth Vader
EVERYONE has the SAME NAME??? negative...
Come to think of it, has Lucas ever called it a title? I think it would be kind of cool if it
was a name. George likes to rip off the Bible, and there's a lot of examples in Biblical cultures of people dubbed with new names during periods of upheaval or when facing a new chapter in their lives. It'd be kind of cool if Darth was a Sith surname (last name first, like in Japanese) and a new name -- not just a title -- is given to a Sith apprentice. That does a lot psychologically to a person, replacing their identity and adopting them into a new culture.
Then, when Obi-Wan calls him Darth in EP IV, it would make even better sense. He's not on a first-name basis with his enemy. He calls him by the name he has taken, the family he has joined -- the house of Darth.
-- END!