Stephen King's "IT" remake has found a writer

Status
Not open for further replies.
Del Toro says he takes on so many projects because he technically is unemployed after each project and there's never any guarantee those projects he'll sign on will be greenlit. He's just covering his bases.
 
Fukunaga goes into deeper detail...

http://variety.com/2015/film/news/cary-fukunaga-it-exit-1201584416/
Fukunaga: “I was trying to make an unconventional horror film. It didn’t fit into the algorithm of what they knew they could spend and make money back on based on not offending their standard genre audience. Our budget was perfectly fine. We were always hovering at the $32 million mark, which was their budget. It was the creative that we were really battling. It was two movies. They didn’t care about that. In the first movie, what I was trying to do was an elevated horror film with actual characters. They didn’t want any characters. They wanted archetypes and scares. I wrote the script. They wanted me to make a much more inoffensive, conventional script. But I don’t think you can do proper Stephen King and make it inoffensive.

“The main difference was making Pennywise more than just the clown. After 30 years of villains that could read the emotional minds of characters and scare them, trying to find really sadistic and intelligent ways he scares children, and also the children had real lives prior to being scared. And all that character work takes time. It’s a slow build, but it’s worth it, especially by the second film. But definitely even in the first film, it pays off.

“It was being rejected. Every little thing was being rejected and asked for changes. Our conversations weren’t dramatic. It was just quietly acrimonious. We didn’t want to make the same movie. We’d already spent millions on pre-production. I certainly did not want to make a movie where I was being micro-managed all the way through production, so I couldn’t be free to actually make something good for them. I never desire to screw something up. I desire to make something as good as possible.

“We invested years and so much anecdotal storytelling in it. Chase and I both put our childhood in that story. So our biggest fear was they were going to take our script and bastardize it. So I’m actually thankful that they are going to rewrite the script. I wouldn’t want them to stealing our childhood memories and using that. I mean, I’m not sure if the fans would have liked what I would had done. I was honoring King’s spirit of it, but I needed to update it. King saw an earlier draft and liked it.”
Ugh ****ing New Line.
 
So, basically...the studio wanted the Poltergeist remake. :dry:
 
In New Line's "defense" (and I'll be honest, Fukanaga is ultimately right here), it's a slippery slope trying to make a hardcore, adult horror movie that centers not only on children, but on children getting terrorized and going through a traumatic, violent ordeal. It's too dark. The concept is too bothersome. We as a society don't want stuff like that in 2015.

The studio probably got scared and thought that the P.C. Cops would come out of the woodwork and cause bad word of mouth. It would take one stupid group on Facebook to start a ruckus, and then New Line has to issue an apology over 6-year-old Georgie Denbrough getting killed at the beginning of the film. That's the world we live in now. You know it, and I know it.

At the end of the day, studios are trying to make money. If they're concerned that making an R-rated movie about children getting killed or emotionally scarred for life from a visceral, bloodcurdling terror in the form of a clown not completely dissimilar in appearance to John Wayne Gacy won't get a profit, I don't find it unreasonable that they wanted it toned down like the new Poltergeist.

Fukanaga's tone and subject matter in True Detective is a niche thing. It was a successful TV show, but mainstream moviegoing audiences wouldn't respond to something like that during an opening box office weekend. Horror as a genre in general isn't very popular as it is, unless it's whatever crap they put in theaters as usual.

People don't want edgy.
 
Fukunaga goes into deeper detail...

http://variety.com/2015/film/news/cary-fukunaga-it-exit-1201584416/

Ugh ****ing New Line.

tumblr_njkihkqb1o1qb2flgo1_500.gif


Im sure the inevitable POS remake they **** out will make money, but not a dime of my money will go towards its box office. ****, New Line, and their generic remake. In the days of $150 million - $300 million dollar budgets New Line cant risk $33 million dollars on a fresh take on the genre?

Klaus4.gif
 
That is depressing to read. It would be nice if their script got released some day.
 
I'm all for an IT remake, I wanna see that crazy ass ending done on screen...but now? After reading that? cya

ji1lkGn.gif
 
I'm never getting a proper Henry/Papa Bower, Patrick Hockstetter....never getting a proper Spider or proper Turtle. SMH New Line.

I thought this kneejerk crap was limited to the Game of Thrones stuff.
 
Last edited:
You got a proper Pennywise, he was just surrounded by an entirely improper movie.
 
This needs to go back to development hell ASAP.
 
Damn, Fukunaga's vision sounded awesome too..this ****ing sucks
 
This needs to go back to development hell ASAP.

That's kind of what I'm hoping for. That the whole thing just stalls for a while, and eventually someone with the rights looks back on what Fukunaga was planning and goes "Hey, maybe he had the right idea about this."
 
Im not even into Horror movies and I wouldve checked Fukunaga's IT.
 
Very few horror movies attempt to be thought provoking or have a slow build leading to a great pay-off nowadays. All suits see are jump scares involving a clown
 
IT Films Next Summer

Posted: November 1, 2015, 01:37:25
Section: Film » It

Here are some news from Bloody Disgusting about the upcoming adaptation of IT:

Andy Muschietti, director and producer of Guillermo del Toro’s Mama, is preparing It, the long-gestured and troubled Stephen King adaptation that would be made as two features.

Recently announced, Andy Muschietti substituted Cary Fukunaga on the New Line project.

Shooting is now set to take place next summer, partly to allow for work with children, as they have the main roles in the first part.

Casting is currently underway, with Will Poulter (The Maze Runner, The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader) still in the mix for the role of Pennywise, the demonic clown. “Will Poulter would be a great option. For me he is at the top of my list,” Muschietti firmed up
 
I thought Poulter already got the role?

Anyway, I'm still curious to see how this unfolds.
 
Can't wait for the cookie cutter ******** we get instead.
 
How To Muck Up A Potentially Great Film 101

Starting course for aspiring studio heads working towards there Associates in Hollywood AssHatery.
 
Is that an attempt at humor?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,306
Messages
22,082,750
Members
45,883
Latest member
Gbiopobing
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"