Stephen King's "IT" remake has found a writer

Status
Not open for further replies.
IT Filming in Toronto This Summer

Posted: April 13, 2016, 22:01:40
Section: Film » It

Looks like the first of the two IT remake movies will be filming in Toronto between June 27 and September 6. This article was posted on Stephen King's IT Remake and is from a Canadian newspaper.

itremake.jpg
 
Wait, didn't they drop the director? Who's directing now?

Like you said, I'll believe it when I see it. Same with The Crow.
 
IT Filming in Toronto This Summer

Posted: April 13, 2016, 22:01:40
Section: Film » It

Looks like the first of the two IT remake movies will be filming in Toronto between June 27 and September 6. This article was posted on Stephen King's IT Remake and is from a Canadian newspaper.

itremake.jpg

Cary wanted to do two films. One from the kids perspective. And one from their adult perspective set years later. Sounds like the studio decided to ditch the second film and fold it all into a single film with just them as kids.

Hopefully this abortion of a film stays in the place where everything floats.
 
... Then why get rid of Fukunaga?
 
Has there been any actual bona fide casting yet?

filming in June so I guess we should hear something soon... right?

I love this book so much, hope it's done somewhat justice
 
It's not filming in June

or at least if it's filming in JUne the film will probably turn out the be crap.
 
I was just going by the above post with a magazine shot that says they are filming June-September.

I really have no idea. This whole project has been confusing as hell to follow
 
This movie is going to be ****... but I'm still curious to see how Poulter pulls off Pennywise. He's still attached, right?
 
Hmm? It's still going to be two films.

No. Its apparently one film from the kids pov. Seems like the studio may have axed the second film that Carry wanted told from the character's adult pov. For now at least.

I bet if the first one is successful they will release a sequel that will be told from the character's grown up pov. So we may yet get two films. Unfortunately I have little confidence in this project since Cary left.
 
No. Its apparently one film from the kids pov. Seems like the studio may have axed the second film that Carry wanted told from the character's adult pov. For now at least.

I bet if the first one is successful they will release a sequel that will be told from the character's grown up pov. So we may yet get two films. Unfortunately I have little confidence in this project since Cary left.


“Gary Doberman wrote the most recent draft working with [director] Andy Muschietti, so it’s being envisioned as two movies,” producer Roy Lee recently said of the project. “It is very close to the source material in one way but very different if you look at it as a literary piece of work. We’re taking it and making the movie from the point of view of the kids, and then making another movie from the point of view of the adults that could potentially then be cut together like the novel. But it’s gonna be a really fun way of making this movie.“

http://www.dreadcentral.com/news/162137/new-adaptation-stephen-kings-begins-filming-june/
 
“Gary Doberman wrote the most recent draft working with [director] Andy Muschietti, so it’s being envisioned as two movies,” producer Roy Lee recently said of the project. “It is very close to the source material in one way but very different if you look at it as a literary piece of work. We’re taking it and making the movie from the point of view of the kids, and then making another movie from the point of view of the adults that could potentially then be cut together like the novel. But it’s gonna be a really fun way of making this movie.“

http://www.dreadcentral.com/news/162137/new-adaptation-stephen-kings-begins-filming-june/

Studios...I swear. They should have just let Cary direct the damn thing if they were still wanting to do two films.
 
I'll believe it'll happen when I see the trailer.

Hollywood reporter states Fukanaga is still attached. Surely, an error?
 
And they still have Poulter listed as Pennywise.

Not very often HR makes a mistake like that.
 
Unless THR is correct and they worked everything out...
 
Doubt it.

I'm still gutted that collaboration isn't happening. Fukunaga may have wanted more of a "high art" horror film, but the projected budget was what? Thirty two million?

I don't know. I think that's still in a safe enough zone to make a profit, even if it wasn't a conventional horror flick.
 
I think 32 million isn't that expensive if it's good.
The Conjuring was made for around the same amount and I really think Fukanaga couldve created a movie that wouldve made some money.

Hell, I don't even like horror movies but I wouldve seen Fukanaga's IT in theaters
 
Thought I saw Fukanaga wanted the budget to be 100 mil for 2 movies. I would have given it to him
 
Thought I saw Fukanaga wanted the budget to be 100 mil for 2 movies. I would have given it to him

100 million seems crazy. This is what he said in September last year:

Fukunaga had planned on making “It” into two films. Although early reports indicated that the director left over budgetary concerns, Fukunaga maintained that wasn’t the case. Both sides had agreed on making the two films for $32 million, according to the director. But Fukunaga said he had bigger disagreements with New Line over the direction of the story. A rep from New Line didn’t respond to a request for a comment. Here’s Fukunaga’s explanation:
Fukunaga: “I was trying to make an unconventional horror film. It didn’t fit into the algorithm of what they knew they could spend and make money back on based on not offending their standard genre audience. Our budget was perfectly fine. We were always hovering at the $32 million mark, which was their budget. It was the creative that we were really battling. It was two movies. They didn’t care about that. In the first movie, what I was trying to do was an elevated horror film with actual characters. They didn’t want any characters. They wanted archetypes and scares. I wrote the script. They wanted me to make a much more inoffensive, conventional script. But I don’t think you can do proper Stephen King and make it inoffensive.


“The main difference was making Pennywise more than just the clown. After 30 years of villains that could read the emotional minds of characters and scare them, trying to find really sadistic and intelligent ways he scares children, and also the children had real lives prior to being scared. And all that character work takes time. It’s a slow build, but it’s worth it, especially by the second film. But definitely even in the first film, it pays off.
“It was being rejected. Every little thing was being rejected and asked for changes. Our conversations weren’t dramatic. It was just quietly acrimonious. We didn’t want to make the same movie. We’d already spent millions on pre-production. I certainly did not want to make a movie where I was being micro-managed all the way through production, so I couldn’t be free to actually make something good for them. I never desire to screw something up. I desire to make something as good as possible.
“We invested years and so much anecdotal storytelling in it. Chase and I both put our childhood in that story. So our biggest fear was they were going to take our script and bastardize it. So I’m actually thankful that they are going to rewrite the script. I wouldn’t want them to stealing our childhood memories and using that. I mean, I’m not sure if the fans would have liked what I would had done. I was honoring King’s spirit of it, but I needed to update it. King saw an earlier draft and liked it.”


http://variety.com/2015/film/news/cary-fukunaga-it-exit-1201584416/
 
Much of that probably would've went into the Turtle and the Spider.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"