KalMart
239-Bean Irish Chili
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2005
- Messages
- 16,732
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 58
God forbid they make it clear in the actual movie!bunk said:^^Watch the behind the scenes.

God forbid they make it clear in the actual movie!bunk said:^^Watch the behind the scenes.
KalMart said:God forbid they make it clear in the actual movie!![]()
Well....now we have you, apparently.bunk said:God forbid people should have intelligence.
You don't say?bunk said:It doesn't take a genius to get inside that thug's head
And exactly where did I mention dialogue...or dialouge, as you put it?bunk said:why should he have dialouge to explain himself. Lucky the for you guy playing him does, on the DVD that is.
Not to exaggerate or anything..DrMylesOBoogie said:It doesn't deserve jack. It's one of the worst movies ever produced and possibley the biggest waste of money ever. SFX are also undeserving of an award as they do more impressive things on TV now for a very small percentage of SR budget. On repeat viewing of SR I really am astonished at hoe bad it is on almost every technical level witht eh budget that it had. The flying effects are dodgey and some of the lighting and green screen effects are among the worts that I've seen for a big summer movie.
KalMart said:Well....now we have you, apparently.
You don't say?
And exactly where did I mention dialogue...or dialouge, as you put it?
Thanks for the effort, though.![]()
You haven't seen very many movies, have you?DrMylesOBoogie said:It doesn't deserve jack. It's one of the worst movies ever produced and possibley the biggest waste of money ever. SFX are also undeserving of an award as they do more impressive things on TV now for a very small percentage of SR budget. On repeat viewing of SR I really am astonished at hoe bad it is on almost every technical level witht eh budget that it had. The flying effects are dodgey and some of the lighting and green screen effects are among the worts that I've seen for a big summer movie.
That was an argument? I don't think so, buttercup. You'll have to do better next time.bunk said:Well, the easiest way to make something clear on screen to an idiot is to explain it through exposition. It's sad how some idiots think they can refute somebody's argument by pointing out spelling mistakes. Oh well.
KalMart said:That was an argument? I don't think so, buttercup. You'll have to do better next time.![]()
And...aside from no mention of dialogue, I seem to remember ain my original post....but I guess it would take a genius to pick that up. Good catch on the spelling, though.
![]()
How 'bout you stick with the thug's head, THEN work your way up, hm? Onward and upward, young squire.
Again...stare long and hard at thebunk said:Alright, let's back up a minute. DrMylesOBoogie asked why the thug would shoot him in the eye with a handgun. I was too lazy to explain why, so I suggested he watch the DVD. You insinuated Singer could have made the thug's intent more clear, without of course, volunteering any ideas on how. I had to assume you were thinking exposition, though it's clear now that you weren't thinking at all. If you don't agree it's obvious in the scene what's going through the thug's head, then tell me why. If you do agree, then your original post is completely pointless.
KalMart said:Again...stare long and hard at theI put at the end. Careful...it moves.
Meant I was kidding.
It's okay, take your time.
So...you're not only the intelligence police, but the 'point' police as well? See that tiny spot on the horizon? That's the boat you missed, bunky.
And what, pray tell, would be the point of pointing out that there is no point? We cordially invite you to get over yourself and move on.![]()
Or maybe look before you stumble next time, bunko? I didn't 'start' anything (see post #127bunk said:Laying it on a bit thick, don't you think? If you never disagreed with me and were only kidding you should have just said so and saved us both from this pseudo argument. Let me take it back to grade school for a sec...YOU STARTED IT!There, how's that.
KalMart said:Or maybe look before you stumble next time, bunko? I didn't 'start' anything (see post #127), but how about I....end it for you, instead? Thanks for the input....which for the sake of convenience we'll call your 'argument', although I suggest you look that up first.
Nice meeting you, too.
^^I'l take feeble attempts at saving face for $500, Alex.bunk said:Oh..so close. It was #126, you know the one where you quoted me without the gun at your temple. Didn't you just use a whole post to explain howmeant kidding? And that's why I said pseudo argument, being that it takes two to tango...so your welcome for the input, maybe next time I'll get some in return, but I won't hold my breath. Thanks, bye.
![]()
KalMart said:^^I'l take feeble attempts at saving face for $500, Alex.
"That'll do Pig...that'll do." Nice try, though.
Stay down, and live to chirp another day, my friend.
So you actually got the joke this time, eh? Took long enough....bunk said:They use 200 dollar increments on Jeopardy! dumbass.
KalMart said:So you actually got the joke this time, eh? Took long enough....
Are you done, yet...or do I have to explain that concept as well?
Yet here you are.bunk said:Ha! Forgive me if I have trouble believing that was on purpose. It's okay, I didn't figure you as a Jeopardy! guy. As for my reply speed...well, some of us have other things going on outside the internets. Ciao.
You certainly can, hence the origin of this little tantrum of yours.bunk said:Yep, just about everyday, albeit sporadically. So what gave you the impression I wasn't familiar with Jeopardy! or any parody of it? You obviously didn't get my joke. I can pick irrelevant things to poke fun at too, besides spelling that is.
KalMart said:You certainly can, hence the origin of this little tantrum of yours.
![]()
So how'd those 'other things' go? Or did you drop your shorts there, too?
Think of your familiy, and save yourself.
Edit: Good boy.![]()
I'm still waiting for you to get a clue and move on (which I've also already told you to do). Nothing's sunk in, huh? This whole time.bunk said:I'd be interested to know where you get 'tantrum' from...maybe all those times when I was out of control.What am I saving myself from? Maybe more of your world class quips or queer pet names. I'm still waiting for something to happen here.
I've seen plenty. SR is probably the most unsulting movie that I've ever seen.I SEE SPIDEY said:You haven't seen very many movies, have you?
KalMart said:I'm still waiting for you to get a clue and move on (which I've also already told you to do). Nothing's sunk in, huh? This whole time.