Swamp Thing support

My girlfriend just bought me the new DVD. I'd never seen the movie, but my brother has a crap load of Marvel movies and I'm trying to compete.

I definately would appreciate a remake, maybe one showing more of his abilities. I vote for either Wes Craven or David Lynch.
 
Peyton Westlake said:
I don't think you should condemn Wes because his one film 'Cursed' bombed. What about his latest Red Eye. That got excellent reviews.

it's not just Cursed, alot of his latest movies suck.

im waiting for Red Eye to come out on video. It looked pretty cool, but i was iffy about paying 10 bucks to see a movie that may or may not suck. I can rent the video for about half the price of the movie ticket.

If Wes Craven decided to NOT appeal to the teenage movie goer(spelling?) and decided to sit down and write and direct an actual movie that is both scary and outstanding at the same time, id see the film in an instant.
 
CrimsonMist said:
it's not just Cursed, alot of his latest movies suck.

im waiting for Red Eye to come out on video. It looked pretty cool, but i was iffy about paying 10 bucks to see a movie that may or may not suck. I can rent the video for about half the price of the movie ticket.

If Wes Craven decided to NOT appeal to the teenage movie goer(spelling?) and decided to sit down and write and direct an actual movie that is both scary and outstanding at the same time, id see the film in an instant.

Well I do agree with you there Crimson. Gearing it towards teens is not a good step, something dark & gritty in the 'Sin City' vein would be on target.
 
I'd like to think, or maybe dream, Alan Moore would want to get involved in some way. If he did, that would be a good step forward.
 
I wasn't really wild about the two movies (especially return of swamp thing), but I think this franchise deserves a reboot.

I really liked the TV show though...


'Do not bring your evil to my swamp!'
 
I don't think a Swamp Thing movie will do that well. He's not as iconic as Batman or Superman, and he doesn't seem like he'd feature in an action-packed movie. In order for it to do well it would need a really well-known director, a well-known lead actor, and a helluva a lot of marketing.
 
The Phantom said:
I don't think a Swamp Thing movie will do that well. He's not as iconic as Batman or Superman, and he doesn't seem like he'd feature in an action-packed movie. In order for it to do well it would need a really well-known director, a well-known lead actor, and a helluva a lot of marketing.

well, first, Constantine isn't that iconic either. And they made a rather good film about him. They changed his look and location(which takes away from him abit IMO), but other than that, they left his attitude in tact.

Swamp Thing was never really "action packed". I think the new series really sucks. It doesnt have any elegent writing to it. You open an issue and it's "**** this!" and "**** that!"...that isnt Swamp Thing.

Swamp Thing would make a better horror film than action film. There could be some very scary, memorable, heroic, maybe even iconic scenes in a film if done right.

Supposedly, Berni Wrightson wrote a screen play several years ago. Id like to read it if it exists.
 
CrimsonMist said:
well, first, Constantine isn't that iconic either. And they made a rather good film about him. They changed his look and location(which takes away from him abit IMO), but other than that, they left his attitude in tact.

Swamp Thing was never really "action packed". I think the new series really sucks. It doesnt have any elegent writing to it. You open an issue and it's "**** this!" and "**** that!"...that isnt Swamp Thing.

Swamp Thing would make a better horror film than action film. There could be some very scary, memorable, heroic, maybe even iconic scenes in a film if done right.

Supposedly, Berni Wrightson wrote a screen play several years ago. Id like to read it if it exists.
Constantine did two of the three things I said Swamp Thing would have to do. It had a well-known actor in the lead role, and it was marketed a lot for a movie that's an adaption of a not-so iconic character.
 
Well, the 1st Blade did well, and really had no huge star in it or marketing.
 
I don't think that WB would look at Man-Thing's failure as a reason to NOT do Swamp Thing. The two characters are very different personality-wise (Swampy spends most of his tortured life contemplating his fuzzy navel. M-T is just a brainless galoot), and a Swamp-Thing movie could work out very well.

Plus, if they were smart, they'd hire David Cronenberg to direct. Cronenberg can balance the disgusting aspects of a monstrous character with some solid, introspective moments. Check out his earlier horror efforts, and you'll see a man who knows how to make us squirm with bio-horror, such as Seth Brundle's degradation into Brundlefly. Check out later stuff (especially the vastly underrated Spider), and you'll see that he can show characters that are tortured mentally and emotionally.

If they develop some of their more obscure properties well, DC could be a real cinematic contender again. Constantine proved that, and V for Vendetta may cement it. Neither property is particularly well-known outside of comic circles, yet they push 'em forward with some solid results.

I'm hoping for the day when that CG "DC" circle makes me as giddy as the flippy Marvel reel.
 
str8raz0r said:
I don't think that WB would look at Man-Thing's failure as a reason to NOT do Swamp Thing. The two characters are very different personality-wise (Swampy spends most of his tortured life contemplating his fuzzy navel. M-T is just a brainless galoot), and a Swamp-Thing movie could work out very well.

Plus, if they were smart, they'd hire David Cronenberg to direct. Cronenberg can balance the disgusting aspects of a monstrous character with some solid, introspective moments. Check out his earlier horror efforts, and you'll see a man who knows how to make us squirm with bio-horror, such as Seth Brundle's degradation into Brundlefly. Check out later stuff (especially the vastly underrated Spider), and you'll see that he can show characters that are tortured mentally and emotionally.

If they develop some of their more obscure properties well, DC could be a real cinematic contender again. Constantine proved that, and V for Vendetta may cement it. Neither property is particularly well-known outside of comic circles, yet they push 'em forward with some solid results.

I'm hoping for the day when that CG "DC" circle makes me as giddy as the flippy Marvel reel.

I agree with your selection of Cronenberg to direct. He is a good choice, possibly Burton as a 2nd choice.
 
Burton is an interesting choice for Swamp Thing. I don't know if Swampy is strange enough to attract Burton's interest.
 
captain_jimbo said:
Tim Burton can do anything as a movie and make it great.

Ermmm...Planet of the Apes remake? That stunk.

Hey, I love Tim Burton. The man's got a flair, but PotA was a heap.

But back to before...Cronenberg, all the way.
 
Burton's PotA blew. Great make-ups by Rick Baker and other visuals, but everything else was just a travesty. Feh. Burton gets a few things right and they are good, but he can crank out some poo just a bad as the next hack.

Cronenberg is an interesting choice. Sure would be enough to make me toss down the bucks to see what he'd do with the character. I know it'd be a trip. That much is a no-brainer.

I think the original ST movie by Wes Craven was really good. At least the elements with Holland and Swamp Thing. The parts with the commandos needed a re-write. I think if they'd just had the ST suit from the sequel, and more (and better-looking) monsters to fight, it would have been a classic. Sure the writing is a little stilted and hammy at times, but it did capture the spirit of the original and didn't bastardize it and go in the wrong direction. If Craven tweaked his original script and had a decent budget, it would be a great-if pointless-remake. But you know how non-fan studio execs love to "re-imagine" the character 'for today's sophisticated young audiences.' Ugh.

Anyone except Joel Schockmaker! I don't need to see Swamp Thing's nipples.

Speaking of nipples... BE WARNED!!! The recent DVD re-release of Swamp Thing has almost ALL of Adrienne Barbeau's nude scenes chopped!!!!! Aggggghhhhhh!!!!!!!!! That's one of the main reasons I bought the dang thing! Yes, it was a cool movie that I remember fondly from my mid-teens that treated a superhero decently, but... dammit... I wanted to re-visit those stunning, wobbly, soft, big hooters on Ms. Barbeau again!!! As a 16 year old kid, I had no idea that scene was going to be in it when I first saw it. It/they took my breath away, and surely put a big smile on the face of every male at the drive-in.

Shame on WB/MGM/Sony for chopping that scene out! Why? It wasn't anything even remotely approaching pornographic. And it wasn't like we got to see the full monty; it was just her big ol' boobs. I can't understand why they would step in and arbitrarily trim a scene like that. To make it more kid-friendly? It had a PG rating. Would in-yer-face hoots for 20-some seconds mandate a rating change to PG-13 on a film that's almost 25 years old??? Give me a break! While I'm venting - they also should have used the artwork from the original release poster that graced the backs of all the comics around that time. It was creepy and cool. The new cover art is dorky at best. Sheesh.

Okay, end of rant.

I'd like to see Swamp Thing done to its fullest potential. Keep Swampy just a suit and contain the CGI to some of the powers he has. I haven't seen any of the 'new' ST stuff. My knowledge is just contained to the original Wein/Wrightson version and the Alan Moore/80's take. There is definitly a big load of horror to mine from this property - if it's handled properly. It has the potential to be a quiet hit and perhaps a franchise, but only in the right hands.

Anyhow, my $.02
 
DirtyHARRY said:
Cronenberg is an interesting choice. Sure would be enough to make me toss down the bucks to see what he'd do with the character. I know it'd be a trip. That much is a no-brainer.

I think the original ST movie by Wes Craven was really good. At least the elements with Holland and Swamp Thing. The parts with the commandos needed a re-write. I think if they'd just had the ST suit from the sequel, and more (and better-looking) monsters to fight, it would have been a classic. Sure the writing is a little stilted and hammy at times, but it did capture the spirit of the original and didn't bastardize it and go in the wrong direction. If Craven tweaked his original script and had a decent budget, it would be a great-if pointless-remake. But you know how non-fan studio execs love to "re-imagine" the character 'for today's sophisticated young audiences.' Ugh.

Anyone except Joel Schockmaker! I don't need to see Swamp Thing's nipples.

Speaking of nipples... BE WARNED!!! The recent DVD re-release of Swamp Thing has almost ALL of Adrienne Barbeau's nude scenes chopped!!!!! Aggggghhhhhh!!!!!!!!! That's one of the main reasons I bought the dang thing! Yes, it was a cool movie that I remember fondly from my mid-teens that treated a superhero decently, but... dammit... I wanted to re-visit those stunning, wobbly, soft, big hooters on Ms. Barbeau again!!! As a 16 year old kid, I had no idea that scene was going to be in it when I first saw it. It/they took my breath away, and surely put a big smile on the face of every male at the drive-in.

Shame on WB/MGM/Sony for chopping that scene out! Why? It wasn't anything even remotely approaching pornographic. And it wasn't like we got to see the full monty; it was just her big ol' boobs. I can't understand why they would step in and arbitrarily trim a scene like that. To make it more kid-friendly? It had a PG rating. Would in-yer-face hoots for 20-some seconds mandate a rating change to PG-13 on a film that's almost 25 years old??? Give me a break! While I'm venting - they also should have used the artwork from the original release poster that graced the backs of all the comics around that time. It was creepy and cool. The new cover art is dorky at best. Sheesh.

Okay, end of rant.

I'd like to see Swamp Thing done to its fullest potential. Keep Swampy just a suit and contain the CGI to some of the powers he has. I haven't seen any of the 'new' ST stuff. My knowledge is just contained to the original Wein/Wrightson version and the Alan Moore/80's take. There is definitly a big load of horror to mine from this property - if it's handled properly. It has the potential to be a quiet hit and perhaps a franchise, but only in the right hands.

Anyhow, my $.02



Cronenberg would be interesting with Swamp Thing. I just dont want some crazy Monster fest though. I want a dark, scary film. I wouldnt mind seeing a trilogy, maybe 3 hours each, based on the American Gothic storyline by Alan Moore. They'd have to drastically change all the background about Constantine, but it could be good.

The first film deals with his origins, him trying to be human again, only finding out he's all plant and have Swampy take on The Floronic Man. These events attract the attention of John Constantine, who realizes something wrong with the balance of good and evil and needs the help of the Swamp Thing, which leads into the next 2 movies.

i had a really cool dream about a Swamp Thing movie. Swamp Thing just happened to be in it. It's kind of a blend between the early Wein/Wrightson story in Swamp Thing#8, with that weird blob of evil in the cave. In this strange town in a desert, A bunch of kids find it, and it takes over one of them, and all this crazy **** happens. They're some corrupt Government agents in there trying to kill the kids and get the blob thing and they become possesse, and 3 witches are there too. They're good witches though. Swamp Thing has to save the world from this evil thing and dies in the process. But the witches find swamp thing's remains and make it into a snake arrow(like in Conan The Barbarian) and shoot it into the sky. Then the ground starts to rumble and all these trees start growing out of the dry sandy ground and everything is happy and Swamp Thing comes back and it's all like "YAY!" i dont know, it was a dream. How it all fits together is beyond me, but the whole arrow thing looked really cool in my dream. It was weird.


the current DVD is the theatrical cut. The original DVD release had all the boob shots in it. But when that came out, supposedly(i read this in some review of the original DVD), a mother rented it for her kid at blockbuster, seeing how it looked interesting, and the rating was PG. She brings it home, and gets digusted over the rating(PG) and gets pissed at BlockBuster. She sues Blockbuster, wins and Blockbusters all across the US have to remove the DVD. and eventually, MGM stopped making the DVD.

this new DVD is the cut version. Whether or not that story is true, i dont know. Probably an urban legend of some sort.

the Alan Moore stuff is in my opinion the best comic book run EVER. It's just such a great story. 6 volumes long, it feels like it's the only run of the book ever. And when it ends, it feels like it was the very end of the comic line. It was perfect. It was scary, sad, romantic...it had everything. the Wein/Wrightson stuff was really good too.

i dont like the new Swamp Thing. it misses the eloquence that Wein and Moore had. It's all "**** you damnit! I'll kill you, *****!". It isnt very good. The story concepts are pretty cool, but the dialog is absolutely horrible and generic.
 
Well, I know when doing re-makes or re-launching a character ,aka Batman Begins , the original team is not brought back but....maybe Wes Craven would like another shot given a bigger budget.
 
Peyton Westlake said:
Well, I know when doing re-makes or re-launching a character ,aka Batman Begins , the original team is not brought back but....maybe Wes Craven would like another shot given a bigger budget.

i dont know about Craven. Like i already said somewhere in this thread, Craven's recent movies have sucked. They all seem to be directed at the teen audience, as opposed to everyone(except small children).

And Len Wein DID write a screen play for a new ST movie in 2004 i think. I dont know what's come of it though.
 
CrimsonMist said:
i dont know about Craven. Like i already said somewhere in this thread, Craven's recent movies have sucked. They all seem to be directed at the teen audience, as opposed to everyone(except small children).

And Len Wein DID write a screen play for a new ST movie in 2004 i think. I dont know what's come of it though.


Let's have a little fun here. Well, lets put it this way CrimsonMist , you are the executive producer of the new Swamp Thing feature film. Who do you hire as writer & director and have no 2nd guessing on your part they were the top choice for the job?
 
I think if the first movie had had the Swamp Thing costume of the 2nd movie it would have done alot better. Alot of people couldn't get past the rubber look the 1st costume had to see that it was a pretty good movie.

I loved the first movie and the TV show was OK but Return of Swamp Thing was just domb. He looked more like Swamp Thing but the story sucked.
 
I still think, DC should scrap the WW idea, possibly Flash too, and go with a horror/supernatural story to a big budget Swampy re-make.
 
Most recent news I found, from this year at least.

[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica] Fan Feed - Feb 14, 2006 - 616 reads: [/FONT][FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica]
'Swamp Thing' movie gets a new writer? (EXTERNAL ARTICLE)
Synopsis: One of the writers of the Constantine screenplay has mentioned that he is working on a film version of Alan Moore's Swamp Thing stories, under the working title of "The Green."
[/FONT]
 
Ok, we have re-made Superman & Batman. I think its time to re-launch Swamp Thing with the same intent of quality for success.
 
Can't say I'm much on the idea of Wes Craven returning to direct a revamp of Swamp Thing. I don't have anything against Craven, but I feel that a remake/revamp of Swamp Thing needs a totally fresh approach, and although Wes didnt really have a large budget to play with, which no doubt prohibited any grand ideas he might have had, I would still prefer a completely fresh take on the character.
Admitedly, the mention of Cronenberg has caught my interest as far as potential directors for Swamp Thing goes.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,266
Messages
22,074,963
Members
45,875
Latest member
kedenlewis
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"