OutOfBoose
#ReleaseTheAyerCut
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2012
- Messages
- 18,162
- Reaction score
- 3,980
- Points
- 103
R rating is still quite a change for the franchise. Past 20 years it was PG.
Im 99% sure it was always R ratedR rating is still quite a change for the franchise. Past 20 years it was PG.
I meant the ones from 20 years ago from what OutofBoose said"Always"?
Machines was. I thought it was 2001 for some reason. Never bothered to watch that ****e since.Im 99% sure it was always R rated
I think it's important for Terminator films. Scenes like:In any case, I don't really don't care about the rating. Especially when Terminator's and T2's R rating aren't that important to the films imo.
It's not like Die Hard where you need John McLane to curse (I mean his catch phrase has "f***" in it) or Alien/Aliens and Rambo II-IV which had a fair amount of gore. And even with those you can make the argument that the rating not being as important. A Good Day to Die Hard was R rated after having a PG13 Live Free or Die Hard and it's seen as worse.
Anyway Sure T1 and T2 had blood and swearing, but not so much that I'm like "the franchise needs it to be good".
I think it also applies to depiction of violence. Everything should work to make it feel as real as possible.James Cameron: The more fantastic the subject the more realistic the situation needs to be for it to work (The Making of T2, 1991)
You're #1 was the main scene I was thinking of from the old movies. That at The Terminator repairing himself in the first movie. ANd I mean the scene of Sarah being burned alive by the nuke would probably be fine in PG13 nowadays. (EDIT: My opinion on the Judgement Day nuke scene bit is very wrong) We literally saw Anakin burning alive in a PG13 movieI think it's important for Terminator films. Scenes like:
1) T-800 repairs himself or removes skin from the arm to shock Dysons;
2) Dream with Sarah is burned alive...
It gives weight to the nightmarish future. Terminators need to be deadly and I believe we need to see death on screen.
I don't think you need an R rating to be Brutal or to have horror. Split, A Quiet Place, The boardroom scene in Shazam, Doc Ock's birth in Spider-Man 2, the nazi being thrown into the propellers in TFA, Wolverine's rampages in X2 and Apocalypse, the burst scene in Cloverfield. All varying degrees of brutal and/or horrifying despite being PG13. Hell even The Magnificent Seven remake was brutal as hell to the point I'm surprised it wasn't R. Terminator can be the same.It also adds to the horror and brutality of the terminators which Genysis severely lacked.
Hell, even T3 at least had a bit of the horror element as well.
And you don't need R rating to make that possible. The Craig Bond films, Magnificent Seven 2016, Jason Bourne films, Taken, TDK, Mission Impossible, all had very "real" gritty scenes of death and violence. Even Alita Battle Angel had a scene with someone getting cut in half. All were PG13 in America. Terminator would be fine along those lines or at least it won't be the reason why a Terminator movie is bad.I think it also applies to depiction of violence. Everything should work to make it feel as real as possible.
Perhaps not something overly grisly or over-the-top Deadpool style, but enough to make you feel that the death is real.
Yeah going back and rewatching that scene I forgot how brutal that particular scene wasThere is no way that the Sarah Connor nuke scene would be PG-13, even today. And it’s not just the violence on screen that makes that scene R, it’s the subject matter and tone of the scene. It is still a completely horrifying scenario that definitely earns its R then and today.
None of them are borderline horror films. Perhaps we can mention Cloverfield 1, but it's more like an exception because the way it was shot allows depiction of graphic violence in murky and unclear way, leaving a lot to imagination. It's compensated by "found footage" type of cinematography. But I believe you need R to make the dark future and visitors from there truly scary.And you don't need R rating to make that possible. The Craig Bond films, Magnificent Seven 2016, Jason Bourne films, Taken, TDK, Mission Impossible, all had very "real" gritty scenes of death and violence. Even Alita Battle Angel had a scene with someone getting cut in half. All were PG13 in America. Terminator would be fine along those lines or at least it won't be the reason why a Terminator movie is bad.
Now if you make it PG13 and you also try to make the tone akin the an MCU movie...then that's a problem. I'm looking at you Terminator Genysis
Split we saw an elderly women crushed to death, A Quiet Place had a scene of a child dying. Sure there wasn't a lot of blood but still. And then the whole birth scene.None of them are borderline horror films. Perhaps we can mention Cloverfield 1, but it's more like an exception because the way it was shot allows depiction of graphic violence in murky and unclear way, leaving a lot to imagination. It's compensated by "found footage" type of cinematography.
So basically taking ideas from T3 and Genisys.
I'm guessing they think the ideas were good, but maybe the execution will make it better. The definition of insanity.Great sources to be pulling from....
Who’s Karen and what am I missing from this joke?