CyclopsWasRight
Well, he was.
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2005
- Messages
- 8,815
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Currently #1 highest grossing movie internationally and #2 highest grossing movie domestically.
The official word from the Studio is that not all villians in the Sinister Six film will have been introduced before that movie. They intend to introduce at least a couple in that movie.
Also, the official word is they have not decided what TASM4 will be yet. Although I have a feeling it will likely follow up on the Venom film more likely than the sinister six. That is the safer bet for the studio. Avi Arad loves Venom too.
They are doing a Venom spinoff to set him up for TASM4 most likely.
So do domestic theaters. Thats why the rule of thumb to break even you look at WW box office and double the production budget. Because foreign and domestc take about 50% profit. So 255 x 2 = 510, then add marketing and promotion loss. An article calculated about 660 million WW for break even. Since the film will easily exceed 700 million WW, the movie will make well over 100 million after DVD sales and rentals, easily.
Frankly, I don't see using Venom again trumping using the Sinister Six. Venom was done once in a Spider-Man film. The Sinister Six have not. Newer idea should come before rehashing something else. Do we really need another Spidey film coming out that everyone questions the need to exist again? I see a Venom/black suit based TASM3/TASM4 only doing that.
I'm still betting with Webb and Garfield likely gone after TASM3, and the fact Sony will be desperate for BO money, they push the SS forward. I'm banking on this being their response to the declining BO trend.
The overseas markets take a higher percentage (varies by territory) than domestic. Any article telling you it's the same for domestic and foreign is mistaken. Otherwise there wouldn't even be a need to differentiate between the two.So do domestic theaters. Thats why the rule of thumb to break even you look at WW box office and double the production budget. Because foreign and domestc take about 50% profit. So 255 x 2 = 510, then add marketing and promotion loss. An article calculated about 660 million WW for break even. Since the film will easily exceed 700 million WW, the movie will make well over 100 million after DVD sales and rentals, easily.
I suspect that is what they will do too. Hopefully, they move Goddard over to TASM3 to replace Webb as well, although that I am less optimistic about. The whole creative team needs to be cleared out and I hope Sony realizes that.

The overseas markets take a higher percentage (varies by territory) than domestic. Any article telling you it's the same for domestic and foreign is mistaken. Otherwise there wouldn't even be a need to differentiate between the two.
It's number 3 domestically behind The Lego Movie and Winter Soldier.Currently #1 highest grossing movie internationally and #2 highest grossing movie domestically.
I hope they do as well, but at the same time, they have scheduled TASM3 on a very quick turnaround. 2 years. I don't see them cleaning house on an entire new creative team for this reason![]()
Currently #1 highest grossing movie internationally and #2 highest grossing movie domestically.
It's number 3 domestically behind The Lego Movie and Winter Soldier.
You can spin numbers like this anyway you want but.
No problem, everyone makes mistakes.You're right, my mistake
Webb and Garfield will be gone for TASM4. Both have stated that. But The Amazing Spider-man will continue with a new director and Peter Parker. So even if they don't get replaced for TASM3, you can still be excited to see what happens for TASM4.
The movie is near the top both internationally and domestically, it's going to be a financial success ranking amongst the top of 2014.
This thread is about the box office of this movie for this year.
Comparisons to past movie performances and growth or shrinkage of the franchise over time is another matter.
garfield isn't coming back for the rest of the series?
wow. the box office is not really picking up much.
garfield isn't coming back for the rest of the series?
I'm not spinning nothing. It's a fact.
The movie is near the top both internationally and domestically, it's going to be a financial success ranking amongst the top of 2014.
This thread is about the box office of this movie for this year.
Comparisons to past movie performances and growth or shrinkage of the franchise over time is another matter.
Legendary, not Universal.The distributor always gets credit, especially one with the clout WB has. But their deal was 50/50, so they only see half those profits, the other half going to Universal. Even Paramount was getting massive praise for their marketing work on the MCU. Now that's over and done with, but they made off like bandits on that deal. You can make the best film ever, but without a big time distributor, nobody's going to see your film. WB deserves massive credit.
I think there's also a good chance TASM2 ends up ranking first on the list of the 2014 films featuring Spider-Man. It's also going to be on top of the list of 2014 films with Andrew Garfield as Peter Parker. Who would complain even if this overpriced film doesn't make a dollar off its theater run as long as it ranks amongst the top 2014 films featuring a character created by Stan Lee. What's the point in pointing out that TASM2 will have a domestic attendance 2/3rd lower than Spider-Man 1, or that despite the overall and exponential growth of overseas markets it'll barely make 10% more than a another film in the franchise released 12 years ago while every other franchises in the genre display two figures increase on that front.
I mean everything is fine right ? Even if hits an all time low for the character on films both financially and critically why would anyone complain ?
Haha, I've read this exact article years ago. That method is obviously just a crude estimate. If you read up further on this the split that a studio gets varies by territory and surely you'd expect that (every territory will have different rules, taxes, levies and laws on what foreign companies can do). That doesn't mean that the measure is useless, it has more meaning when a film has a normal domestic/overseas split. It's not like this film is going to lose a load of money but Spidey has gone from juggernaut to a property that could lose money with future films.There is a lot to figure out to see how much a movie makes. The comment at the bottom suggests just doubling the production budget and comparing with WW gross:
http://io9.com/5747305/how-much-money-does-a-movie-need-to-make-to-be-profitable
As long as it makes $250,000,001 it's all good right?
Question is now will the international market save TASM3 again? If the international market made $100m less for this movie then it would have been a bust even at $600m. Can TASM3 pull in $500m from the overseas markets like this movie did? Because I don't see it doing much better domestically, they'd be lucky to get a lateral movement.