Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]382791[/split]
Troy, Pablo and Scarlettess seem to be the only ones around here who are thinking straight. Jeez.
Yes, I don't get where people have come up with the idea that Peter was experimented on, nor why - if it's true - it somehow undermines WHO Peter is and WHAT makes him special.
Let's say his Dad DID messed with his DNA...so what? How does that change his character? How does this change the fact that he's a smart, nerdy, shy kid who gets spider powers, and uses them poorly before learning to use them responsibly after Uncle Ben's death? It's not like he even KNOWS that is what happened and walks around school with girls swooning over him because he has super genes.
People seem to be hanging on the fact that because his DNA being messed with changes Peter because now instead of "anyone" being able to be Spider-Man, now, ONLY Peter can.
Guess what?
ONLY Peter can be Spider-Man, regardless of what's in his DNA prior to the spider bite. It is PETER'S personality, his life lessons, his desire and his mistakes and need for repentance that MAKES Spider-Man. It has NOTHING to do with his DNA. And remember, it the comics, he learned of the Spider-totem, which is pretty much a mystical version of the dad-messing-with-his-DNA angle.
People can have more than one motivation. It's his desire to learn about his parents that starts the ball rolling. This does not take away from Ben at all. In fact, to me, it seems like it will help ACCENTUATE Ben's importance. Being obsessed with his parents might cause a rift between Peter and Ben, which would be a much more believable, and dramatic version of the little fight that Peter and Ben had in SM1. Upon his death, Peter will realize that by obsessing over his parents, he did not appreciate Ben.
Stories are full of "coincidences" if you want to look at it that way. But really its as simple as cause and effect. One event leads to another, which leads to another, etc.
Heh, you should be in the Olympic Long Jump competition, because that was one of the biggest jumps to a conclusion I've seen lately.
Ignoring the fact that we have NO IDEA if the rumor concerning Peter's DNA is true, there is NOTHING that suggests Peter getting bitten was some elaborate design by his father. ALL we know is that Peter's parents left in a hurry and were never heard from again. Plenty of stuff would have been left behind. The suitcase is a plot device - nothing more. Its what starts Peter's desire to find out more about his parents.
The second sentence doesn't change the first. The second sentence - if true (which again, we have no idea, and I've yet to see any evidence that supports the hysterics) - does nothing but add a little bit more story to the event, it fleshes it out. It can still be easily explained as "Peter Parker gains super-powers after being bitten by a radioactive spider." because that is STILL what happens.
Once again, we have no idea if this is true, and therefore we have no idea of the context of the rumor. I would agree that if his dad just came home one day and decided he wanted to dick around with his son's DNA, that'd be a problem. BUT not knowing what the context is - why he did it, and what, exactly did he do if anything - doesn't allow us to judge his actions. Even still, I, as an audience member, WOULD care about Peter uncovering the mystery, because I WOULD want to know why.
And it doesn't need to happen, lol.
I just hope that we have some good strength feats in ASM. I guess holding on to a SUV is a good feat, but hopefully there will be many others. People take it for granted just how strong he really is.
Still kinda ties in to the whole "not an accident" thing I guess.*ahem*
I think that Peter's father might be genetically experimenting with different species of Spiders and not his son Peter.
I mean, in his lab he is clearly trying to do some experiment involving different species of spiders, and it is possible that one such genetically altered spider (which is unique) later on bites Peter Parker which gives him his Spider powers.
I hope it doesn't turn out that Peter's dad has experimented on him as a kid, because that's child abuse. I think that's just too much to add to Peter's origin, it doesn't belong in my opinion. Him experimenting on himself and unwittingly passing on some dormant trait to Peter is more palatable, but I'm not saying I'm too keen on that either.
He is experimenting on Spiders, genetically altering Spiders, i don't think that he is experimenting on his son, himself or Dr. Conners.
It may be shown later on in the movie that one of those genetically altered spider bites Peter Parker accidently.
Hrm, guys?
Look at the trailer and stop as Peter's dad working on that chalkboard.....there's an area that say 'Araknid Genome'.
Arachnid are animals that have an exoskeleton, a segmented body, and 8 jointed legs that include the spiders and scorpions.
Genome is the entirety of an organism's hereditary information. It is encoded in DNA.
It is clear that peter parker's dad is working on Spider's DNA, so he could be developing a special type of genetically altered Spider.
He is experimenting on Spiders, genetically altering Spiders, i don't think that he is experimenting on his son, himself or Dr. Conners.
It may be shown later on in the movie that one of those genetically altered spider bites Peter Parker accidently.
I also like the choice of casting Andrew Garfield as Peter Parker, that was a genius decision.
Taking about coincidences, does anyone find it funny that director's name is Mark Webb ?