The Amazing Spider-Man The Amazing Spider-Man General Discussion & Speculation Thread - - Part 11

Status
Not open for further replies.
We don't know. It might just be something for the viral campaign. It may be in the movie, but Webb said there wasn't a wrestling scene. So who knows?
 
They didn't "fix" them. Did they get all paranoid and edit them so they're red in the promo stuff? Yes.
Ahhhhh, so it's just in the promo stuff.

Oh well, I think the trailers look badass. I can't wait for this movie. :woot:
 
VMAN Interview:

tumblr_m3lrwm7NSu1qiiqedo2_500.gif


But you know the saying: with great power comes great responsibility. A three-contract deal, a huge budget, and the fate of a franchise resting more or less solely on Garfield's shoulders—along with the very high probability that he's about to become one of the most famous people on the planet—mean it certainly applies here. The problem is that Andrew Garfield isn't a celebrity, he's an actor. The 28-year-old has worked almost exclusively on artful projects, with some of our most celebrated filmmakers: David Fincher, Robert Redford, and Spike Jonze. He received a "Best Actor" BAFTA, at the age of 23, for Boy A, and—at the time of this writing—he's garnering rave reviews for his role in Mike Nichols's Broadway revival of Death of a Salesman. The auteur Mark Romanek, who directed Garfield in his adaptation of Never Let Me Go, describes the young actor as "utterly brilliant" and told me that "through sheer craft, using his emotional intelligence as an actor, he dimensionalizes the moment—making it deeper, more interesting, more truthful."

It's an exceptional position in which Garfield finds himself. But if anyone can relate to him, can speak to his experience and the coming storm of fame, it's Tobey Maguire. Before he put on the suit and helmed the franchise that shook the world, Maguire was (and continues to be) an actor's actor too, an artist, and one celebrated by the incredible directors he'd worked with, including Woody Allen, Ang Lee, and Terry Gilliam. When cult director Sam Raimi was brought on to adapt Spider-Man for the big screen, he found in Maguire a perfect Peter Parker—and the rest is history. So no one is better equipped to give Andrew Garfield advice upon of the release of his own Amazing Spider-Man. A decade after blowing up the box offices and becoming a household name, the original Spidey hands the reins—along with some invaluable words of wisdom—to Andrew Garfield, our next friendly neighborhood megastar.

TM: And do you feel—I don't want to say confined or imply any negativity— but the schedule of a broadway show can be long and hard, portraying a character day after day.

Andrew: I think this is enough to be contending with right now. The only other thing that's been preying on my mind is the impending release of this movie I've done, and that is much more stressful than being on stage every night.

TM: [Laughs] Would that be the release of The Amazing Spider-Man?!

Andrew: That's the one! Do you know about this movie? [Laughs]

TM: I do know about it! actually, when it was coming together, I was particularly excited at two moments: one was when [director] Marc Webb got involved. I think he's an interesting and cool choice. and then I was certainly curious as to who was going to play Peter Parker. When I heard it was you, I was literally like, ****ing perfect!

Andrew: Oh, man!

TM: I just want it to be great, and I thought, What a great actor andrew is, i'm glad that's what's happening here.

Andrew: That's so nice of you.

TM" What was the process? How did you end up being the guy?

Andrew: It was pretty basic, apart from it being more dragged out and pressure-filled and dra- matic than any other audition process I've ever been through. They like to put you through the ringer, in the respect that it creates drama and tension among a generation of actors.

TM: [Laughs]

Andrew: And they succeed every time, it seems. But, no, it was great. I'm friends with a few of the guys who were up for it, and I actually had dinner with Jamie [Bell] the night of my screen test and his screen test. We compared notes and war stories, and we kind of got past the ridiculousness of it all and thought it would be a nice idea to get everyone together and kind of interview each other about how messed up the process is, being against each other, and remember that we're all in it together, knowing that when you take off that bodysuit someone else is going to be stepping into your sweat immediately after.

It's a weird kind of cattle call. But Marc [Webb] was great. He was very open and encouraging. You have the monitoring area with literally about 30 people judging you, looking at your face and whispering to each other—it's one of the most disconcerting and kind of humiliating things to go through, if you're aware of it, you know what I mean?

TM: Yeah, I completely understand. What kind of effect has this had on you?

Andrew: The main thing I'm thinking about and worrying about is what happens after this movie comes out. What was your experience when you became Spider-Man in people's eyes? I'm interested to hear what you have to say about the whole life change that it brings. Because right now I have a host of fears that I'm contending with on a minute-to-minute basis. I'm not in the reality of it yet, so I'm sure I'm imagining it will be much worse than it is. I admire you so much because you're an actor and that's all you've ever been and all you ever will be. It must be very hard to hold on to the simple fact of wanting to be an actor, to tell stories and not have your image become bigger than your art. Do you have a recollection of a definite change, or was it a seamless thing?

TM: I think our thing was a little bit different because movies hadn't been doing the sort of opening-weekend business that's fairly common—even expected—today. The first Harry Potter came out about six months before us and it was this phenomenon from Day one. it was so wild because it was a new thing at that moment—and i'm not saying that hasn't happened in movie history, but at the time that was a big jump. and then that happened with us. People didn't anticipate [2002's Spider- Man] to be like that. Leading up to it you start to get reactions and people tell you, you know, what the tracking is and what range your opening weekend box office is likely to be. but for me it was kind of unexpected. So much shifted in my life the weekend the movie came out. it was shocking.

AG: Oh wow, that's crazy.
 
Do people out there honestly believe tentpole blockbusters will go on for more than a trilogy...four...even five or six?!

All these big characters get trilogies and then it's reboot or nothing for years. Sorry if I'm offending anyone, but it boggles my freaking mind when people get serious in discussion for any big superhero film for...for example Spider-Man 4! Or Spider-Man 5! Or even Spider-Man 6!

The idea is incomprehensible.
 
I was watching Fact or Faked on SyFy and they gave a commercial for Eureka saying they'll be showing a brand new sneak peak of The Amazing Spider-Man in the next episode.
 
Not really... SM4 was very much happening. It's not necessarily 3 movies, then auto reboot. There aren't even that many franchises to base an assumption like that off.

To be fair though, they only signed on for three movies initially, so the fourth one in a franchise like that is always a crap shoot
 
Finally got around to seeing The Social Network last night. I like this kid.
 
Did anyone else just see the TV Spot on NBC? It was AMAZING, and there's gonna be a 4 minute "super preview" on the season premiere of America's Got Talent!
 
Oh well, I think the trailers look badass. I can't wait for this movie. :woot:
:up: Me either.

I personally don't know how some people aren't sold on Garfield yet. I think he looks the part and has the acting chops to back it up. I was sold a long while ago.
 
Do people out there honestly believe tentpole blockbusters will go on for more than a trilogy...four...even five or six?!

All these big characters get trilogies and then it's reboot or nothing for years. Sorry if I'm offending anyone, but it boggles my freaking mind when people get serious in discussion for any big superhero film for...for example Spider-Man 4! Or Spider-Man 5! Or even Spider-Man 6!

The idea is incomprehensible.

Umm fast five and fast six which is in production
 
Umm fast five and fast six which is in production

Those weren't planned though. Those flicks kept making money and kept making money and the only reason Fast and Furious (the fourth one) was a success is because the original cast came back and the only reason they came back is because to be real, they needed to. Plus, that series is defying logic in the sense that the fourth and fifth ones are the best in the series. They reinvented the franchise with the 5th one but again, they weren't planned and every studio isn't lucky like that. The James Bond movies were never planned to be a trilogy so they can keep going and Fast and the Furious was never planned as a trilogy, much less 6 and 7 movies
 
The Fast and the Furious films aren't big super hero flicks or movies centered around a very popular character in culture...
 
Oh Land Before Time...great first movie and then it's all downhill for straight to DVD ********. Yet, I watched the next 5 or 6 as a kid.

And aside from Pokemon the First Movie(Which was a childhood event for me)...the other 4 theatrical ones bombed hard.

Did anyone really think there would be more than 3 films in this reboot trilogy?
 
Andrew gets some advices from Tobey....is big no-no for me. It doesnt matter anymore..Andrew will nail the role for sure.

EDIT: Oh man I didnt know that TM was Tobey M, LOL. My bad. Yeah it was a nice and really cool interview
 
Last edited:
Great to read the two Spidey actors interacting with each other. Tobey is my Spider-Man, the one I grew up with, and Andrew will be fantastic as well.
 
Good read, Spider-Man did set the bar for opening weekend blockbuster
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"