^I think what he is trying to say is that people (including yourself apparently) give a pass to all the MCU films when they make updates and changes to the source material but if Peter Parker owns one skateboard, then everybody loses their minds
Thank you, once again.
Thank you, once again.
Captain America was okay, but nothing great. People want to complain about TASM's marketing flaws, but what about this film? Most of the action scenes looked pretty darn epic in the trailer, but it turns out it was part of this montage of action sequences. I really was expecting an awesome battle when he barges through the doors of that warehouse shooting his way in.
For the record, I live in the city, and have seen many people skateboard. You have visited "a few times," but I don't think you have really been exposed to it enough to judge that fairly.I've been to NYC a few times and it seems very rare to spot anyone with a skateboard. Maybe that's the reason Peter is the only one who has a skateboard in the film
In no way did Thor or Captain America ever feel like a "two hour trailer". Iron Man 2? Yes, because it was crammed into to help out other films, such as Thor, but the two films you speak of were fine and did not feel like they were crammed in by anything to build up into the Avengers. IM 2 has been the only film to do that.
Sorry I didn't use 'imo'?
Plus, needless to say, Captain America does have ties to Avengers the most so it had to be tied with Avengers, even being called Captain America: The First Avenger. While it did tie into Avengers, it was, in no way, as much of an Avengers trailer Iron Man 2 was.
Well, I've always said that I like change if its done well.
Iron Man 1 tied into the Avengers, but it was its own film. I even thought that The Incredible Hulk was more of a solid film than IM2, Thor, & Cap. They weren't nearly as bad as IM2 of course, but they still all feel like 2 hour trailers for the Avengers. I don't think Thor or Captain America are really worthy enough to have their own movies. Luckily for them, however, they are part of a cinematic universe, and are pretty darn cool when part of the Avengers. The Hulk is a character that is very hard to sell for a 2 hour film (I mean, a giant CGI monster), though he works a lot more in a television series, despite him looking really stupid by today's standards:
However, TIH was reminiscent to the series, which is still considered a success for its time, and is a big part of pop culture even to this day. The movie's opening was a nod to the opening of the series, and even threw in the "Lonely Man" theme song. Although not a great film, it still manages to have some good action scenes (although pretty few), some good casting (Ed Norton, William Hurt, Tim Roth), and feel like its own movie, while still part of the MCU. Bruce Banner was trying to recreate the super soldier serum that made Captain America, but Captain America is never mentioned, and left for viewers to pick up on themselves. Tony stark's cameo was really cool here, as it just gave enough of a hint to "the avengers."
Peter in the Webb franchise is still a high school student. Obviously you won't see him struggle financially until he moves out of the house and goes to university, which will probably happen in TASM 2 or TASM 3. But once he gets there, you'll see him financially down just as much as you saw Tobey's Peter be financially down or even more.
They didn't ignore the Bugle. They're setting it up and foreshadowing it. They already set up the idea that Peter is a freelance photographer and we've seen DB newspapers all throughout the first film. He'll definitely get a job at the Bugle at some point, possibly in TASM 2.
They both have a good relationships with their uncle and aunt but Andrew's Peter's relationship with them is more realistic and more like the relationship in the comics. Peter was never a golden angel that never did anything wrong in the comics to begin with (like how many people assume) but at the same time, he wasn't a bad kid either. TASM got that perfectly. Plus, I like how TASM helped you get to know Uncle Ben more before killing him off. In SM1, you don't feel as sorry for Ben's death because you don't know him as well. All you know is that he is important to Peter and that's the main reason you have to feel bad for the tragedy.
Already discussed this. For an "in a nutshell" overview, I find TASM to have captured the nerd aspect of Peter better because it didn't just tell you that he is a nerd but also showed it to you while the Raimi films just told you he was a nerd. Plus, as I said before, there are multiple types of nerds and Peter was never the George McFly type of nerd in the comics like how Tobey's Peter was.
The definition of what is and isn't mature varies from person to person so I can't say anything on this. I do, however, hope that you're not comparing a man in his 20's like Tobey's Peter with a high school kid like Andrew's Peter and argue that he is more mature thus Tobey's Peter is more like the comics. You have to compare them at the exact same ages in that case. I can't say TASM's high school Peter is more mature than SM1's high school Peter since we barely see much of SM1's high school Peter but I do feels TASM's Peter feels more mature than SM1's Peter. But then again, what I view as maturity is different from what you would view as maturity.
^I think what he is trying to say is that people (including yourself apparently) give a pass to all the MCU films when they make updates and changes to the source material but if Peter Parker owns one skateboard, then everybody loses their minds
.
Vanko was underdevolep terribly,as was Hammer
Just look at the Metal guy attack scenes in Thor,The CGI is ridiculous
