and that's exactly my point. gallieo did have sufficient evidence to claim heliocentrism. yet you suggest he didn't citing mistakes in explanation of tides.
and yes you cannot prove a negative but it is not expected of historians to. it is expected that they don't make claims from the lack of evidence they have.
also the stories of thor and the hobbit are miles apart but it's obvious one inspired parts of the other. i know that alot of the factual claims about horus have been twisted to better fit, but to suggest the jesus myth is all original would be incredulous.
It's pretty original. But no one ever claims religions don't have clear parallels. That's simply more due to the similarities of what most people will encounter in their lives. Floods, miracles, terrible storms, plagues, and supposedly "magical" individuals are things most people experience, even today people claim to witness these things with regularity. Hell, alien abduction stories aren't far off from angel abduction stories, or goblin abduction stories which existed before the concept of aliens existed.
Are you saying it repeats tropes of hero stories? So do most. Superman, Hercules, Jesus, and Optimus Prime all have similar themes of death/rebirth, miraculous feats, but have you ever read the Horus story? There are very few similarities. He wasn't born of a virgin, for one. He didn't have 12 disciples, and didn't even have disciples, just 4 demi-gods he was usually with, and he certainly wasn't poor, nor was he crucified, so it's a pretty different story.
Also, Jesus (and Muhammad) are very unique in how they are "human" religious icons, and how they started a different trend in religions. You could say Christianity was Nolanized religion, religion that existed in a grounded reality and used that as it's link to the supernatural, rather than assuming reality was controlled by supernatural forces alone. As far as we know, there are no human counterparts for the Gods of Mount Olympus.
You guys continue to want to push this Jesus myth thing when it's a fairly incredulous position
And no, you're wrong, if Galileo did that today the Science community would absolute rebuke him for it (although many scientific discovers start off as bad science, hence why they get tweaked so much before we arrive at the versions we're familiar with today).
The whole "Jesus is a myth" thing was actually something originally dreamed up by other religions as a means to slander Christianity. It's not new, no credible historian believes such a thing, and it's all been roundly debunked.