Johnny Blaze
Freethinker
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2003
- Messages
- 20,849
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Only one I know of, currently, is that dude in Australia who, I believe, claims to be a reincarnated Jesus.
I think there is some preacher in America who has a following (can't say how many) who claims it.Only one I know of, currently, is that dude in Australia who, I believe, claims to be a reincarnated Jesus.
Self-righteous atheist *****ebaggery![]()
Self-righteous atheist *****ebaggery![]()
Come on. That second one especially is dead on.
Not necessarily the case at all.It's what you choose to believe in and if you honestly believe then you will be rewarded.
Most atheists don't completely deny the possibility of the existence of a god or gods.I think the sign of true igronance is to completely deny the possibility of God. As I've said again and again, I do not believe in God. I do not believe fully in Science. I believe in the possibility that the scientists have got it right much more than I believe in the possibility of God; never the less, I'm still open to the fact that there may be one.
I also think atheism produces just as many idiots as religion- as that cartoon proves.
I think South Park was pretty dead on when it spoofed Dawkins and all those atheist factions. Spirituality seems to me to have a lot to do with empathy, something I notice many atheists lack. I'm not sure, even if everyone became atheists, that we'd get rid of wars or "religious" differences. We'd probably find new spirituality that fit more within the confines of science, but still leads to all the same issues.Actually, I find most describe both as something not physical but spiritual.
Well, I think someone might reasonably be able to argue that science can't answer certain types of questions, but this assumes that those types of questions can be answered in the first place. I think it's asinine.How does someone not believe in Science? It's not a matter of faith.
Bingo.Many wars that are supposedly religious are actually conflicts over other things, territory resources, power and the like. Religion just become the dividing line between groups, but one that obscures the real issues.
Spirituality seems to me to have a lot to do with empathy, something I notice many atheists lack.
Well, I think someone might reasonably be able to argue that science can't answer certain types of questions, but this assumes that those types of questions can be answered in the first place. I think it's asinine.
Just a casual observation. It seems to appeal to a lot to people who have low degrees of empathy. Religion, particularly the spirituality portion of it, seems to appeal to people's emotional connections. It's also seems to be why it's so easily co-opted.
How do you figure that one? This should be good.