that's how i look at it, you pick what you want to think of them as.I look at it two ways, The Asgardians are an advanced society that has the ability to easily travel to other worlds and produce extrodianary weapons making the alien. But because of their difference from humans early on and their advanced tech they were callled Gods. So they are both Aliens and Gods.
I would think Thor has a large part, since it's his brother that is the enemy. And I'm sure Steve will have a nice chunk as well considering he just woke up at the end of Cap. But that's just me, going off of that little bit of info.
Hulk performed a feat of valor in the end of TIH. He's more likely to do it again than Abomination being a do-gooder on a team of superheroes.
You are looking at it from the perspective of what we know and suggesting Fury isn't morally grey.
You have Hulk who a scientist with an uncontrollable monster inside. Ross has made it his business to make Banner seen as a murdering psychopath in the government and military. Sure, he defeated Blonsky but who is say he did it out of goodness rather than just getting rid of the competition? Fury wasn't even there. He could be getting stories about how Hulk smashed Blonsky and ran off like an animal.
On the other hand you have Blonsky, a first rate soldier who only seemed to go nutso after exposure. He was seen as the new super-soldier. Fury is taking his chances on the good soldier before the mad scientist.
I recall hearing Hemmsworth say he wanted a break after the Avengers. Don't see how that is possible with Thor 2 being released in 2013.I would think that cast members such as Chris Evans and Chris Hemmsworth would want to take a rest from their characters after they finish filming their respective sequels for at least a year or 2 before they get back to those roles.
I recall hearing Hemmsworth say he wanted a break after the Avengers. Don't see how that is possible with Thor 2 being released in 2013.
While I don't think the audience would get tired of them, I do think that they should give them a break for new characters, as you said. Though, along with Thor 2 and IM3, I'm sure we'll be getting antoher Marvel film based off of a character that hasn't been used yet. Ant-Man is the likliest, if you ask me.Well if I were part of the group in charge at Marvel Studios, I think it would be best for both the cast members and for profiting reasons to give CA and Thor a little break before having them appear on screen again after their respective sequels premiere.
I think they'll run the chance of audience members getting tired even of seeing them so many times over the years. They could use the breather time for them to dive into other characters as well, such as Antman/Wasp, Black Panther, and hell, they could even give the Hulk another shot at a sequel to the TIH.
That way, they not only give the cast and GA a rest from Thor and CA, but they're able to use that time to invest in new characters to bring for the sequel to the Avengers.
While I don't think the audience would get tired of them, I do think that they should give them a break for new characters, as you said. Though, along with Thor 2 and IM3, I'm sure we'll be getting antoher Marvel film based off of a character that hasn't been used yet. Ant-Man is the likliest, if you ask me.
I wish it was May 2012, lol.
The trailer having black bars doesn't say much. Avatar was in 1.78:1 and still had the trailers in 2.35:1, so we won't really know until either Marvel gives us confirmation or we see the actual movie.Check my post, it had black bars, didn't it?
I'm sure it's because it was kind of just thrown out there. Effects were pretty much the priority. Not the colour correction and aspect ratio.
By the way, that photo calling Thor 'Fabio' is kinda manipulative, since the image is flipped, to make it look like he has his hair parted like a girl. In the other photos, the ones where the hair looks much cooler, his part is clearly on the other side, the same side it was on for 'Thor'.
Also, they didn't 'make' his hair more brown, they simply didn't dye his eyebrows and beard, which always looked quite fake. Also, the hair, if it is still a wig, is much more convincing. The 'Thor' hair was always way too flat and obviously fixed in place.
That does make a good point; thought it begs one to wonder then, if things were like that, where the true situation behind the Hulk and Blonsky confrontation isn't well known to those it should be known to, why would Coulson feel as though Blonsky shouldn't be on the team then?
You are looking at it from the perspective of what we know and suggesting Fury isn't morally grey.
You have Hulk who a scientist with an uncontrollable monster inside. Ross has made it his business to make Banner seen as a murdering psychopath in the government and military. Sure, he defeated Blonsky but who is say he did it out of goodness rather than just getting rid of the competition? Fury wasn't even there. He could be getting stories about how Hulk smashed Blonsky and ran off like an animal.
On the other hand you have Blonsky, a first rate soldier who only seemed to go nutso after exposure. He was seen as the new super-soldier. Fury is taking his chances on the good soldier before the mad scientist.
t:Maybe he's the one that debriefed Betty after the whole incident.

t:I'm still wondering on which of these three Avengers will have the most when it comes to resolving their own issues/cliffhangers from their previous films?
1. Steve/Captain America
2. Bruce/Hulk
3. Thor