Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]379477[/split]
Like that idea. Or Jarvis becoming ultron-likeI'm holding out hope for a J.A.R.V.I.S./Vision mashup. Android body provided by Pym with the AI provided by Stark (with Paul Bettany's voice).
THREAD MANAGER!!!!!!!!!
I could do without a Pym movie altogether, tbh. But that's just me...I'd be fine with them being introduced ala Hawkeye as new team members, or SHIELD scientists or what have you.
Like that idea. Or Jarvis becoming ultron-like
Since IM2 I've been thinking I'd like for Tony to give Jarvis a bit more oomph. He had way to hard a time bypassing Vanko's hack of the WarMachine armor.I'm holding out hope for a J.A.R.V.I.S./Vision mashup. Android body provided by Pym with the AI provided by Stark (with Paul Bettany's voice).
question: Someone mentioned Avengers takes place 2 years later, I've heard one year, which is correct and how do we know?
I think it would make more sense if Pym had more to do with the AI and Tony with the android body. That is part of Pym's scientific repertoir afterall. It has to do with his helmet invention and it would place the blame more on him when Ultron goes berserk (which is how it should be).Absolute speculation/fan fiction: if Pym creates the "ultimate" android body but Stark has to provide the AI (via JARVIS), then you get Vision. Following that train of though, Pym's ego would kick in in an attempt to one-up Stark, which leads to him creating Ultron on his own.
https://twitter.com/#!/EricVespe/status/180728210059825152My Avengers set visit embargo is lifting on April 2nd. Good news for you guys, bad news for my post SXSW rest and relaxation.
Someone is free to correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the 2 years came from footage screened at one of the cons or expos (I want to say the D23 expo), in the description for the footage where Widow comes to 'recruit' Banner she mentions something like "It's been 2 years since your last incident"question: Someone mentioned Avengers takes place 2 years later, I've heard one year, which is correct and how do we know?
i'd say a year or less... i'd assume cap would have been somewhat acclimated to the current time period in a 2 year period. Far more than he seems to be in what we've seen so far anyway.
I believe it's 2 years. Numerous sources have said its been 2 years since Banner had his last hulk out, and TIH is supposed to be relatively in conjunction with IM2.
This is what I'm talkin about for comparison:
Their faces don't really match up imho. The brow is totally different and cheekbones..idk....for some reason it looks like they used an old pic of Hulk
They aren't strong enough characters for their own film IMO. I'm glad the Ant-Man solo film was scrapped, hope it stays that way.
It does seems that way...
And Thor takes place around IM2 as well doesn't it?
This is what I'm talkin about for comparison:
Their faces don't really match up imho. The brow is totally different and cheekbones..idk....for some reason it looks like they used an old pic of Hulk
Who said "Ant-Man" was scrapped? Last report, a few months ago, was that Cornish had turned in the latest (fourth...?) rewrite to Marvel for review, and the ball was in their court.
But in all honesty, I'd rather see Ant-Man and Wasp introduced via an Avengers sequel proper, instead of their own film. As much as I like and believe in Wright, and have no doubt he'd make an interesting film no matter what the angle, it just makes more sense to see Hank and Janet as Avengers instead of a solo joint.
It does seems that way...
And Thor takes place around IM2 as well doesn't it?