CoherentChaos
Civilian
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2013
- Messages
- 827
- Reaction score
- 4
- Points
- 13
If we don't see her feet all that often, it'd be nice if they were just an off-screen thing. I *get* the function of them when filming. I just don't like them being part of the character. It makes sense that if Nat's not in disguise (playing the helpless damsel) and is able to do things in her agent gear, she won't limit herself with high heels.
It's the fact that they're prominent in promo art that bugs me. The promo art could have easily given her proper looking combat boots, and that could easily be the canon.
I dunno, it's just, it'd be like if there was promo art of Tony outside of the armor, and they made a point to include RDJ's lifts as though it were a canon part of the character.
It's the fact that they're prominent in promo art that bugs me. The promo art could have easily given her proper looking combat boots, and that could easily be the canon.
I dunno, it's just, it'd be like if there was promo art of Tony outside of the armor, and they made a point to include RDJ's lifts as though it were a canon part of the character.



I was actually looking for her cool weapons in the first movie because she got me all hyped up with her awesome arsenal in IM1.
t:
