You should get on that. Although like many the 3rd act of Sunshine always conflicts me.
Fincher and Zodiac getting snubbed was just criminal. There's no other word for it.Just one in a very long list over the years. Wrestler, Zodiac, and Prestige are some other recent ones that I wish received more recognition at the time.
What conflicts you?
ThanksI'd add Looper to that list.
Fincher and Zodiac getting snubbed was just criminal. There's no other word for it.
Just the way it plays out. I can't be specific since I haven't seen it in awhile but I just enjoyed the first two-thirds of the movie a lot more than the latter third.
i will say Sunshine has a bad ass soundtrack... heard that song in Kick-Ass when Hit Girl saves bigdaddy...
amazingly off topic in here
Ah, you're probably talking about the transformation from Sci-Fi to generic Slasher/Horror (in several scenes).
i will say Sunshine has a bad ass soundtrack... heard that song in Kick-Ass when Hit Girl saves bigdaddy...
amazingly off topic in here
Exactly. I have no problem with it going in that direction but it was far less interesting than what we got before. It doesn't kill the movie for me like it does for some people, still enjoyed it as a whole.
I don't think that matters.Yep, Avatar's story was derived of plots from Ferngully, Dances with Wolves and Pocahontas.
That's what I think matters. I don't think the story was that bad though, just nothing special. It was a great cinematic event though to me.It wasn't even a well-written story at the end of the day.
Kind of agree on Avengers. Again the story is not going to win any awards but there is so much awesome on screen, the (classic) characters are all great and collaborate really well in dialogue and action. So even without a complex story it's enough to rate alongside ESB, ROTK & TDK as my top films. With TDKR I expect the story/dialogue scenes to be the main event ahead of the action. I love Batman fighting and using his gadgets & also the named villains doing their thing but vehicle sections not so much (police car chases etc).Avatar's visuals/SFX were awe-spiring but that wasn't enough for me.
Now, The Avengers' story might have been simplistic but it was executed far better than Avatar's.
If WB wanted to win, they would have put TDKR in IMAX 3D.People are saying we're going to "lose" now. We'll show them right?
There is no superhero fatigue. Only fatigue of bad superhero movies. Like Green Lantern and Wolverine and their ilk.
Yeah it doesn't. I mean it's not bad compared to other 3D out there but you don't miss out on anything really if you give it a miss.If WB wanted to win, they would have put TDKR in IMAX 3D.Instead, they preferred keeping Nolan happy and making more money for them in the future.
The viewers won (in addition to Nolan), IMO. Every review I've seen about Avengers says that the 3D was only so-so and doesn't add much to the experience.
![]()
I don't think that matters.That's what I think matters. I don't think the story was that bad though, just nothing special. It was a great cinematic event though to me.
Kind of agree on Avengers. Again the story is not going to win any awards but there is so much awesome on screen, the (classic) characters are all great and collaborate really well in dialogue and action. So even without a complex story it's enough to rate alongside ESB, ROTK & TDK as my top films. With TDKR I expect the story/dialogue scenes to be the main event ahead of the action. I love Batman fighting and using his gadgets & also the named villains doing their thing but vehicle sections not so much (police car chases etc).
Quite a few of my favourite directors are getting older now and I get the feeling they are losing a tiny bit of their edge/coolness on stories. They are still capable of making good films, just not cool films. Maybe a bit too family friendly, maybe just a little bit naff!No disagreement here. Although Avatar harbored a derivative story, so have many modern Hollywood movies. However, Cameron didn't try to add his own spin on it. He simply slapped the story together with minimal effort and built it around the visuals/SFX.
I don't know if everyone likes it but the interactions between [BLACKOUT]nearly all the characters on the helicarrier is one of my favourite bits of the whole film. Just love how all these greats of Marvel history are bouncing off one another.[/BLACKOUT] Humour is normally very bad in comic films, not because it shouldn't be there..it's just often poorly executed or overdone to the point of taking the weight out of the serious stuff. This is the best execution I can remember outside of a comedy, and it's also better than many modern comedies out there. The action is of course crazy in scale but still well choreographed. It's quite easy to keep track of where everyone is supposed to be at any point in time (something Michael Bay is hilariously bad at). Avengers is simply the comic I read come to life.Agreed. Whedon's story for The Avengers might have been one of the weak aspects of the film (the entire first act and half of the second was malnourished and unmemorable) but the interactions between the characters, the humor and the witty one-liners made up for it.
Yep. Nolan is focusing on his story and dialogue over the action set-pieces. It's not that there won't be any stellar action sequences (cuz there will be) but the reason why Nolan's films have been praised from here to the moon is because of his storytelling abilities.
Well said guys. I LOVED The Avengers and seeing TDKR trailer on the big screen got me even more pumped. Yeah, The Avengers probably won't win awards for their story, but for sure they'll have a chance at CGI, action, and what not. It was awesome to see the heroes on the big screen doing what they do best. Whedon did a superb job at balancing each character and giving them their memorable moments. The Avengers did really well at the box office, but I think TDKR will beat it by a small margin.