Chris Wallace
LET'S DO A HEADCOUNT...
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2001
- Messages
- 35,629
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 31
Sorry; couldn't resist.
So...you're saying that it wasn't a box office success.....and that's okay? Cute. Really Cute.
Now we're going to pretend that the DVD rentals/sales have made 55 million dollars (the amount the film lost in the box office). Fine. However, you do know that DVDs don't grow on trees, right? They cost money to produce, distribute and promote, just like the film itself. On top of that, the rental profits belogn more to the rental store than to the studio.
In the year 2099, Catwoman may FINALLY break even... maybe.
As for the thing about female superhero flicks, Catwoman, Elektra, Aeon Flux, Red Sonja and Ultraviolet didn't fail because they starred female heroes....they faled because they were awful films.
When Hollywood stops treating female leads as sex objects, and they start writing them as strong, interesting characters (something CINO failed to do), then we'll see some success for the ladies. Until then, we're left with whatever Hollywood decides to throw at us.
I'd hardly say that Berry's career "burnt to dust"
If they decided to do another Catwoman film I suggest they should hire Loeb as writer then hire Shawnee Smith as Catwoman. If you don't believe me, see for yourself:
It's so hard to believe that way back when, this movie actually had defenders. Oh, what strange times those were, when no matter how bad or unrecognizeable an "adaptation" was, someone was still bound to defend it as long as the name of the movie was the same as the source material. It's great that we can finally look back and laugh at this movie knowing that the real Catwoman's future is safe.
Actually there were. You just have to look back about 5 years. In truth althoug critics may rub the film, it made more money than any other female superheroine film to that date.
It's a black female superhero movie, basically.. and that's why I think many people hate it.