The Clinton Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Clinton: " Come back here, I'll bite your legs off ! "
Obama: " You got no arms or legs you stupid B^%$%1"
 
Venom'sDad said:
I've done "Talk Radio" for a little more than two years... so I feel I have a pretty good pulse of the American psyche and American Politics. With that said, members of the Democrat Party Establishment are refusing to meet with billary. She is desparately trying to appeal for the Supers to back her.

I've said a few months ago, that the Establishment wants to rid themselves of the Clintons dominance and would back anyone who could lead the charge to vanquish them. Remember, this was suppose to be a coronation party for billary... a crowning ceremony if you will. Yet with all the drama that is surrounding Barrack Obama campaign, that would certainly doom any other candidate, billary, who was suppose to be inevitable, cannot not seem to gain any ground or reach over and grab his constituents. Now, there is real pressure for her to get out of the race. They gave her all the rope she needed to hang herself.

BUT... and this is a big BUT, she and Rev. Bill have completely divided the Democrat Party. Well, I say there is possibly more in store. I think billary may attempt the reck the party. Let me explain...

There is an unspoken rule for party candidates that candidates should not attack fellow candidates from the same party in a Primary. This is exactly what billary has been doing ever since she realize the party had turn on her and don't want her. She is doing the dirty work for McCain and the Republicans... in her attempt to ensure a run in 2012. My feeling is McCain is one and out, and if McCain could run for a second term, he will be very vulnerable. Unfortunate for her, Obama will most likely defeat McCain and may bring a few Senate & House seats with him.

So billary stragety may be, IMO, petition the Supers at the Convention; otherwise, she may be content to reck the Party by running as an Independent... effectively spliting the vote in the General Election enough for McCain to win(a la Ross Perot). If she does that, the Democrat Pary will never allow her to come back to the party and when her term is up as Senator, they will support one of their own to run against her(a la Lieberman). By that time, with her bruised feelings, she may not want to come back. The Clintons would be effectively vanquish from the Democrat Party... but at what cost.

So now she has a decision to make about her future with the Democrat Party. She is treading dangerous waters. I for one, hopes she dives right in. :hehe:

This is why I say she's not worthy to become President, because she would put her own ambitions over the country's interest... regardless if it means recking the country. History has proven, most Socialist does exactly that... I say good riddance.
Click to expand...

First, It's DEMOCRATIC Party.

And is it too hard to type "Bill and Hillary" or "The Clintons?" Do you have to type it out as "Billary?"

I mean, it's hard to take you seriously when you a) don't show any objectivity whatsoever and b) can't get the names of the people or institutions you're criticizing correct.
 
jmanspice said:
First, It's DEMOCRATIC Party.

And is it too hard to type "Bill and Hillary" or "The Clintons?" Do you have to type it out as "Billary?"

I mean, it's hard to take you seriously when you a) don't show any objectivity whatsoever and b) can't get the names of the people or institutions you're criticizing correct.
Click to expand...

I would dare say that's on purpose.
 
TheMarx said:
I would dare say that's on purpose.
Click to expand...

Yeah, that goes back to the days when Bill Clinton was President. The joke (among conservatives, at least) was that Hillary Clinton, especially early on, was as much the President as he was . . . so we actually had President Billary Clinton. And, like all good nicknames, it's stuck around far past its time.
 
Handsome Rob said:
Yeah, that goes back to the days when Bill Clinton was President. The joke (among conservatives, at least) was that Hillary Clinton, especially early on, was as much the President as he was . . . so we actually had President Billary Clinton. And, like all good nicknames, it's stuck around far past its time.
Click to expand...

Oh I'm familiar with it. It's just not necessary to use it. It is quite a partisan phrase and people really lose credibility when they use things like that in their conversations.
 
I am for Hillary and I would just like to know, honestly, how likely is it that we will be seeing her win over Barack?
 
Joker'sHenchman said:
I am for Hillary and I would just like to know, honestly, how likely is it that we will be seeing her win over Barack?
Click to expand...

At this point, it would take a small miracle. There is a chance though. He isn't the nominee yet.
 
How was Mark Penn not sacked long before he was?

http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1738331,00.html

As aides looked over the campaign calendar, chief strategist Mark Penn confidently predicted that an early win in California would put her over the top because she would pick up all the state's 370 delegates. It sounded smart, but as every high school civics student now knows, Penn was wrong: Democrats, unlike the Republicans, apportion their delegates according to vote totals, rather than allowing any state to award them winner-take-all. Sitting nearby, veteran Democratic insider Harold M. Ickes, who had helped write those rules, was horrified — and let Penn know it. "How can it possibly be," Ickes asked, "that the much vaunted chief strategist doesn't understand proportional allocation?"


How can Clinton's top strategist run a campaign if he doesn't even know the basic rules of the primary?
 
souvlaki said:
How was Mark Penn not sacked long before he was?

http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1738331,00.html

As aides looked over the campaign calendar, chief strategist Mark Penn confidently predicted that an early win in California would put her over the top because she would pick up all the state's 370 delegates. It sounded smart, but as every high school civics student now knows, Penn was wrong: Democrats, unlike the Republicans, apportion their delegates according to vote totals, rather than allowing any state to award them winner-take-all. Sitting nearby, veteran Democratic insider Harold M. Ickes, who had helped write those rules, was horrified — and let Penn know it. "How can it possibly be," Ickes asked, "that the much vaunted chief strategist doesn't understand proportional allocation?"


How can Clinton's top strategist run a campaign if he doesn't even know the basic rules of the primary?
Click to expand...

:up: :up
 
I just wonder what all of you "Hillary-Haters" are going to do if she does end up landing the VP nomination...
 
She'd better not land the VP nomination, otherwise McCain will cruise to an easy victory in November.
 
I have a hard time believing she will get it, but we'll see.
 
TheMarx said:
It's a possibility.
Click to expand...

I don't think it is a big one, if it is a possibility at all. How will she help him? Will her masquerade as a gun-toting, alcoholic high school drop-out work in the general election? Will she be able to secure any swing states for him?

Frankly, I see them as two extremely polarizing figures whose personalities will clash time and time again on the campaign trail. Obama is better off picking a moderate governor or a military official-- someone who won't overshadow his campaign.
 
jmanspice said:
I don't think it is a big one, if it is a possibility at all. How will she help him? Will her masquerade as a gun-toting, alcoholic high school drop-out work in the general election? Will she be able to secure any swing states for him?

Frankly, I see them as two extremely polarizing figures whose personalities will clash time and time again on the campaign trail. Obama is better off picking a moderate governor or a military official-- someone who won't overshadow his campaign.
Click to expand...

And to that I say, good luck trying to find a suitable VP that doesn't support Clinton.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Marx
  • Locked
The Clinton Thread II
39 40 41
Replies
1K
Views
94K
Thread Manager
T
T
Bust of Hillary Clinton Unveiled at Museum of Sex
Replies
21
Views
1K
Untilteld
Untilteld
sithgoblin
2008 Presidential Election: Gore/Clinton
2 3
Replies
57
Views
5K
Chris B
Chris B
Superman
Bill Clinton smacking down Chris Wallace.
15 16 17
Replies
404
Views
17K
Mr Sparkle
Mr Sparkle
Memphis Slim
Hillary Caught Cheating On Questions
2 3
Replies
51
Views
6K
SuperMonkey
SuperMonkey

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Staff online

Members online

Total: 8,336 (members: 29, guests: 8,307)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,358
Messages
22,091,046
Members
45,886
Latest member
Elchido

Share this page

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"